This study of the
Christian roots of the Occult, or/and Esoteric, and Natural Magic will start
with the second century CE when a new method of prognostication emerged in the Greek-speaking
world. Names and terms were converted to their numerical values (via psephic calculations, better known as gematria) and then
analyzed to predict the future. There are scores of Greek manuscripts that
attest to the variety of techniques and the popularity of numerological
prognostication throughout the Byzantine and modern-Greek eras. The few
numerological techniques that have been published are not well known. We
present here among others six major types of Greek numerology, as well as a few
of the many variations and suggest ways in which Christian scholars used these
texts. Plus where Clement of Alexandria, opposed ‘Christian Gnostics’ like
Marcus 'Magus', Clement himself promoted the ‘esoteric’ Christianity
popularized by the ‘Occult Philosophy’ (a bestseller) that even left its mark
on modern ‘occultists’ like Rudolf Steiner who was to design his own modernist
“Occult Science.” Plus also present day ‘alternative writers’ continue to be
influenced by ‘esoteric insights’ today.
Titus Flavius Clement
was a major Christian scholar whose religious thinking culminates in his
description of the ideal Christian, the "True Gnostic", to which
especially books VI and VII of the Stromateis are
devoted. Working in Alexandria he called himself a ‘non-Gnostic
Christian’ and was instead convinced that there existed a secret and esoteric
Christian tradition alongside that which was openly transmitted by the Church:
edge (gnosis), handed down in unwritten form from the apostles through a
succession of teachers, has come to a few people' (Strom. VI, 61, 3). Clement
attacked the Gnostics for their claim to be the only true Christians and their
rejection of faith as a sufficient base for salvation, but he had also much in
common with them. He quotes many Gnostic teachers from the 2nd century, and not
always disapprovingly. One of the scholarly problems of his Excerpts from Theodotus is the difficulty to distinguish clearly between
the Gnostic quotations and Clement's own
comments.(See A. Choufrine, Gnosis, Theophany, Theosis: Studies in Clement of Alexandria's Appropriation
of his Background, New York, 2002).
A first and
indispensable characteristic of the true Gnostic is his moral perfection and
detachment from worldly things (strong influence of Stoic ethics). His
knowledge not only concerns God and good and evil, but also the whole world:
'He possesses the most precise truth about the world from its creation to its
end, having learned it from the Truth itself' (Strom. VI, 78, 5)' It is a
spiritual knowledge, which derives from revelation and is to be found in the
words of the Logos, i.e. in the divine scriptures. Therefore, an important part
of the esoteric tradition is the capacity to read the hidden the hidden meaning
of Scripture by means of allegorical exegesis. This provides the Gnostic with a
perfect knowledge of past, present and future, and leads him to an ever-deeper
understanding of the divine world and to the contemplation of God. See o. Stiihlin (ed.), Clemens Alexandrinus,
I: ProtrepticlIs IInd Paedagoglls, 3rd rev. ed. by U. Treu;
vol. II: Stromata Buch I-VI, 4th rev. ed. by L. Fruchtel,
mit Nachtriige von U. Treu; vol. III: Stromata. Buch
VII IInd VIII, Excerpta ex Theodoto. Eclogae propheticae. Quis dives salvbetur. Fragmente, 2nd ed. by L. Fruchtel
und U. Treu , Berlin : Akademie Verlag, 1960-1985; with
French translation: C. Mondesert,
(ed.), Le Protreptique (SC
2), 2nd ed., Paris : Editions du Cerf, 1949, C. Mondesert, H.-I. Marrou et al. (eds.), Le Pedagogue,3 vols. (SC 70, 108, 158), Ibidem 1960,
1965, 1970. C. Mondesert, P.Th. Camelot et al. (eds.), Les Stromateis, 7 vols.
(SC 30, 38, 463, 278, 279, 446, 428), Ibidem 1951-2001; F. Sagnard (ed.),
Extraits de Theodote, (SC 23), Ibidem 1948 (2nd ed. 1970). English translation by W. Wilson, in: ANCL, vols. 4
and 12, Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1867, 1869 (repr.
ANF, vol. 2, Edinburgh/Grand Rapids: T&T Clark/W.B. Eerdmans, 1994).
In regards to
his 'gematria' however, for Clement there is no category, including
number, that comprehends and stands over his nature. His metaphors and
pedagogical tools may be philosophical in origin, but in the substance of his
theology, Clement stands with Irenaeus as a Christian monotheist, not a Platonist.Although God stands above arithmetic, Clement
finds arithrnetical unity a helpful metaphor of the
divine, and he states that man's goal is a similar kind of unity. As a person
becomes divinized into astate of dispassion, he
becomes purely "Monadic." (Stromateis
4.23.152.1.)
This unity is
epitomized for Clement in the Church, "For just as God is one and the Lord
is one . . . that which is most highly treasured is praised for its solitude
since it is an imitation of one principle. Thus, the one Church also has a
portion in the nature of the One, which nature the [heretics] strive to chop
into many heresies." (Ibid. 7.17.107.4).This joint share in God's unity
allows the Church to collect people "into the unity of the one faith of
its proper testarnents- rather of the one testament
from different ages- by the will of the one God, through the one Lord."
(Ibid. 7.17.107.5.) Thus, the Church, which is the earthly image of the
heavenly Church, reflects precisely the unity of God, and humanity' s return to
that unity. (Ibid. 4.8.66.1.)
Irenaeus's theology
of arithmetic in agreement with Clement, claims that numbers, syllabies, and letters are composite and that they have
many different qualities. Such a claim was contestable. For by the very name
given to them, "elements," letters were considered de facto to have
no parts. Being elements, letters were the building blocks of the linguistic
universe. Numbers, too, shared in this simplicity. So Irenaeus' s suggestion,
that numbers and letters have multiple parts and qualities, suggests that both
categories can be further analyzed, reduced to yet other, more fundamental,
categories. Irenaeus reduces them to terms derived from the narrative of truth,
the rule of faith. Irenaeus' s first critique here, then, is that the
Valentinians have not appropriately understood what an element is, that is,
what is neither compounded nor subject to change. Numbers and letters are not
elements in the true sense of the word.
In contrast to
Irenaeus however there is in Clement very little, if any, polemic against the
Valentinian (example Marcus 'Magus' ) Ogdoad and Pleroma. But his insistence of
the unity of God is as strong as lrenaeus's, evidence
that orthodox emphasis on God' s unity was not conditioned by Valentinianism.
In contrast to Irenaeus and Clement, Marcus 'Magus' was what was called a
(real?) ‘Gnostic’ can be located between I60 and I80 AD. The treatise Adversus haereses, by Irenaeus,
bishop of Lyons, is the direct or indirect source of all the subsequent heresiological information available in the Greek, Latin
and Syriac languages, with the partial exception of the ritual of apolytrosis (redemption, in this case a second baptism)
described by Hippolytus of Rome.
Rather like his
gnostic ancestor Simon Magus, Marcus is represented as a powerful, charismatic
figure, perhaps even a charlatan, with his magic tricks, visionary claims,
entrepreneurial usage of syncretism and skill in attracting well-educated
religious women. In conclusion, Marcus' heritage can be envisaged immediately
in medieval Merkabah literature (esp. Shi'ur Qomah: angels as letters that reproduce the structure of
the human body).
As for Simon Magus
being a gnostic, in fact there is no agreement on the answers. Still, they
diligently comb the Simonian tradition and offer various hypotheses. Despite
their different ways of reconstructing Simon, all scholars agree that the
doctrines of the late second-century Simonian tradition are quite different
from those of the first. The hopes that the Apophasis Megale,
a text only Hippolytus quotes, might go back to Simon were quashed when it whas found out that Hippolytus was citing not the Apophasis
Megale but a paraphrase of it. Thus there is no way
to determine the authorship and date of the Paraphrase. The intricacy of
thought suggests a late development of the Sirnonian
tradition, so the early third century would be reasonable.
The Paraphrase shows
features common to the apocalyptic genre, but it is much more. First it is also
a commentary on two texts: the Bible and the Apophasis Megale.
This is evident from the number of quotations from the Bible, its many attempts
to reconcile the Pentateuch with a doctrine of syzygies, and the frequent
explanations and interpretations of the Apophasis Megale,
the original impetus for writing.
Second, as reported
by Hippolytus, the author of the Paraphrase of the Apophasis Megale (hence deutero-Simon)
considers the root of the Universe to be the Infinite Power. This title,
repeated twenty tirnes in Hippolytus's account, is
clearly important to deutero-Simon. The Paraphrase
also toys with an important part of the ancient Pythagorean tradition (see
further down).
But where early
Christian polemics against the gnostics attacked
their belief that they had attained an independent and higher sphere of
knowledge, or revelation, which was inaccessible to others (such as
Christians), Clement's attack on the gnostics was not intended to invalidate the social
dichotomy which they proposed. Thus Clement opposes those gnostics,
who believed that gnosis could only be attained by those who participated in
secret ceremonies. (See S.R.C. Lilla, Clement of Alexandria, Oxford,1971, p.
163-173).
Otherwise, regarding
the general idea that gnosis was an esoteric accomplishment open to very few,
Clement is in agreement with his adversaries; they merely differed as to what
the qualifications of these few should be. And not unlike Irenaeus, Clement's view, the attainment of gnosis by a Christian is
facilitated by two factors: non-literal reading of Scripture and oral
transmission of secret doctrine:
If we say Christ
himself is wisdom and his activity showed itself in the prophets, through which
it is possible to learn the transmission of gnosis, as he himself taught the
holy Apostles at his appearance, gnosis, then, should be wisdom, which is a
knowledge and apprehension of things which are, which will be and which have
passed, and which, insofar as it was transmitted and revealed by the Son of
God, is firm and reliable. Therefore, if contemplation is the goal of the wise
man, then the contemplation of those who are still philosophers seeks, to be
sure, divine wisdom, which it does not attain unless through learning it
receives the prophetic voice revealed to it, by which it comprehends what is,
will be and was before-how these things are, were and will be. Gnosis itself is
what has descended by transmission to a few, imparted by the Apostles without
writing. (Clement, Les stromates, VI, ed. P.
Descourtieux, Paris: Editions du Cerf, 1999, 184-186).
As part of his
argument in favour of this esoteric hermeneutics,
Clement puts together a list of historical examples, showing how different
philosophical schools were united in concealing the truth from the unworthy.
The general lines are as follows. Anything which appears through a veil seems
"better and holier". (Lilla, Clement of Alexandria,144-146). The
words of Scripture act as this sort of covering.
Thoroughly infused
with that same form of esotericism which we initially found in Clement, in the
end it was the Pseudo-Dionysian corpus (a group of religious works written in
Greek by an unknown author in the late fifth or early sixth century) that kept
the esoteric approach in circulation after it had faded from mainstream
Christian biblical exegesis. (See
Dionysiaca, ed. P. Chevallier, 2 vols (Paris: DescJee, de Brower et Cie.,
1937-1950), I, civ.)
Its reception
throughout the Middle Ages and Renaissance was extremely wide. At least six
different Latin translations of the corpus (or parts of it) were made between
the ninth and fifteenth centuries; the 1990 critical edition lists over 120
manuscripts containing works of Pseudo-Dionysius copied during or before the
fifteenth century; and there were nine different printed editions before 1500.
Aside from their direct circulation in Latin, these works were received into
scholastic theology and philosophy by, among others, Albertus Magnus and his
student Thomas Aquinas.
However such general
hermeneutic stance also flourished in the Jewish tradition where various
methods of reading had been developed specifically to undermine the exoteric grammatical
and syntactical structure of the biblical text and to reveal an esoteric stratum
of meaning. Both of these approaches including the Neoplatonic, where to be
united by Pico de la Mirandola. However the idea that
an intellectually superior group of believers could extract a higher level of
knowledge from Scripture was already current in the exegetical work of Philo of
Alexandria.
Pico used the
writings of Pseudo-Dionysius to develop a theory of scriptural exegesis which
was anagogical in the Dionysian sense-which led the reader upwards towards God.
This idea of 'anagogical' exegesis also made its way into the standard
Christian framework of the four senses of Scripture. Here, however, it was
defined as a property of the signification of a word (for example, the idea of
Jerusalem as the heavenly city), not as an intellectual action undergone by the
reader.
Thus where the
Dionysius scripts concentrate on the representation of the upper levels of the
hierarchy-the ranks of angels and, above them, God, Pico claims to be concerned
with the entire cosmic taxonomy below God as shown in the following
illustration.
Pico regards the
three worlds as exhibiting what he calls "mutual containment". They
are arranged hierarchically-angelic world at the top, sublunar world at the
bottom-but they are actually deeply intertwined. Each world contains the same
things (relatively and by analogy) as the other two.
Those who wrote after
Pico like Giordano Bruno and Henricus Cornelius
Agrippa, in his "Occult
Philosophy" adhered
more closely to Pico's model than Pico did to the models which antedated him,
which, again, are of largely Platonic inspiration.
Some scholars have
tended to assume the existence of gematria called psephic,
techniques everywhere and at all times in the ancient world, and used that
assumption to find the earliest examples. Few ask when and how the technique,
as a whole, could have arisen and made sense to a given culture. Thus biblical
scholars today persist in looking for instances of gematria in the Hebrew
Scriptures, without investigating the requisite background in habits of numeration.
For example the "New method projects," sponsored by the Berkeley
Institute of Biblical Archaeology and Literature (BIBAL), analyzes the entire
Hebrew Bible using gematria-inspired logotechnical
analysis. It suffers from the same methodological error. Hippolytus saw the isopsephic exercises of Colarbasus
and others as a Pythagoreanizing (i.e., corruption)
of Christianity. A re-invented Pythagoras in this case ofcourse
was a misidentification of what actually was Platonic thinking.
Fact is that psephy first emerged in the early- to mid-first century and
grew during the cultural and political rise of Alexandria in the third century
BCE. It occurs in poetry, riddles, theological systems, and divinatory
techniques. It gained enough popularity that tables were composed, juxtaposing
interesting and ironic isopsephisms, possibly an aid
to party-goers who, after dinner, would often entertain themselves with
"puzzles and riddles and sets of names in numbers.“
The earliest example
of isopsephy in the writings of a scholar however, is
probably found with Philo of Alexandria. Although attuned to numbers, there is
in fact only one example that approaches psephy, an
innocuous reference to the change of Sara' s name to Sarra
(Questions and Answers on Genesis 3.53). Against those who might consider the
name change in Genesis 17.15 trivial, Philo argues that it represents the
change, not of a single letter, but of a hundred of them, since that was the
numerical value of the rho. Philo,however, does not
consider the association of rho with one hundred of intrinsic significance.He favors instead an explanation based on the
definitions of Sara and Sarra in Hebrew. This passage
does not even imply Philo's awareness of or use of isopsephy,
just his knowledge of the Milesian system of notation. That this is the only Philonic reference to anything remotely close to isopsephy is telling. It seems that if there were any
author of the first century who would latch onto isopsephy
it would be Philo, because of his propensity to employ speculative, allegorical
exegesis.
The active use of isopsephy can be found with Leonides
of Alexandria an astrologer, who turned to epigrams, where the psephic value of the couplets or individuallines
are equal. It is also to Leonides we can credit the
first instances of the basic phrasing that led to the terms psephy
and isopsephy, the earliest terminology for the
technique. Thus the suggestion that isopsephism
emerged in literary circles due to the patronage of Nero remains a
possibility.
Isopsephy also appears in the second century as a device
in Jewish and Samaritan exegesis. In ancient Hebrew when authors used shorthand
notation for numbers, they used a decimal-based system, in imitation of Demotic
Egyptian conventions. Calendral material from the
Qumran material and pendants from Masada use this Egyptian-style stroke system.
And even after the introduction of alphabetic system, the decimal system
lingered on for some time.
The twenty-two
letters of the Hebrew alphabet are five short of the number needed to build a
complete model (like the Milesian system which emerged from an Ionian trading
outpost in the western Nile delta). When required to write numbers greater than
four hundred, Hebrew writers combined characters, thus jury-rigging their
alphabet so as to function like the Greek.
Shortly after Greek isopsephy became a widespread literary phenomenon in the
Mediterranean world, Rabbinic Jews picked up on the practice and began to use
the Hebrew version of it in their Biblical exegesis. Possibly the earliest
example of explicit Hebrew isopsephy is found, oddly
enough, in Revelation 13.18, the infamous number of the beast. In variations of
the Greek text, 616, rather than 666, is given as the number, which leads to an
elegant solution, that both versions describe the name Nero Caesar as written
in Hebrew. If this interpretation of the number of the beast is correct, it
implies that Christians were active participants in the earliest days of Hebrew
and Aramaic isopsephy. Plus if this is the solution
to Rev 13.18, it should be noted that it attests to the lateness of the system
of Hebrew gematria that employed the final form of five letters for the values
five to nine hundred. Under this later, Kabbalistic system the final nun would
have given Nero Caesar the value 956.
The earliest explicit
examples of Rabbinic Jewish gematria come from second century Rabbi Yehudah (fl. mid 2d c. CE, in Galilee), interpreting
Jeremiah 9.10, concludes that "no one passed through Judea for fifty-two
years" because of the numerical value of the word Behemah
(beast). Rabbi Nathan (fl. 2d-3d c. CE, in Palestine) suggests that the
gematria of "These are the words" in Exodus 35.1 hints at the
thirty-nine categories of work forbidden on the Sabbath. The most famous
example of Rabbinic isopsephy deals with Genesis
14.14 and the three hundred eighteen servants of Abraham, a tradition
transmitted under the name of Bar Qappara' (2d-3d c.,
son of R. Eliezer).
The second
century proved to be a fertile period for the development of Jewish techniques
of isopsephy in Hebrew and Aramaic, and Jewish
teachers first used the term gematria, to describe any number of methods of
interpretation that use grammatical analysis. Thus, whereas Greek used isopsephy, the term still used in modern Greek, Hebrew Aramaie used gematria, the term most familiar in modem
western languages.The idea that arithmetic could be
applied to names so as to lay bare the secrets of the universe however, meant
that psephy soon began to be seen as Pythagorean.
Hippolytus saw the isopsephic exercises of Colarbasus and others as a Pythagoreanizing
(i.e., corruption) of Christianity.
Yet also
Pythagoras is largely a mythic figure constructed by later generations who
wrote in his name.Where Pythagoras was regarded as
something of a wonderworker and shaman, he was not thought to have taught
techniques in astrology, magie, or divination.
Referrence to the earlier Pythagorean communities (in diet and
dress but not science) depends largely upon Pythagorean sayings
preserved by Aristotle and other pseudepigraphal Pythagorean writings. They
show no interest in the mathematical arts, or philosophy, untill
Plato was conflated with Pythagoras.
Those who wanted to
emphasize and retain the religious and ritualistic character of the
community-separated from those who began to engage in the philosophical and
scientific currents of their age. The former group is said to have treated the
latter as if they were innovators, and to have denied them any right to claim
to be Pythagoreans. There may have been more than one split in the Pythagorean
communities of the fifth century, but this rifts shows that early on it was disputed
as to how to live the Pythagorean way of life.
Plato was not a
Pythagorean, since in each of these dialogues he develops a philosophy that is
uniquely and distinctly his own. Nevertheless in the generation after Plato's
death three competing interpretations of the Platonic and Pythagorean
traditions emerged. The first is that of Aristotle (384-322 BCE), one of the
few authors of the fourth century to distinguish between the Pythagoreans and
Plato. It was Speusippus (407-339 BCE), the nephew of
Plato, who transforrned Plato' s forms into numbers,
and Xenocrates (fl. 339-314aCE) continued to reshape
Platonic doctrine.
A third interpretive
tradition went further. Aristoxenus of Tarentum (b.
ca. 370 BCE)-musician, philosopher, and one-time disciple of the Pythagorean Xenophilus diverged considerably from the Pythagoreans in
his music theory and philosophy. In praising Pythagoras, Aristoxenus
credited him with inventing doctrines later embraced by Plato and Aristotle.
His lost works on the Pythagoreans probably furnished material for writers in
late antiquity, and they signaled a trend discemable
in the pseudo-Pythagorean writings, of ascribing not just Plato' s teachings to
Pythagoras, but also Aristotelian and Stoic doctrines.
Of these three
reinterpretations, the second proved to be the most influential in the later
tradition, which conflated Pythagoras, Plato, and the Pythagoreans. Plato was
reinterpreted in the light of a Pythagorean tradition, itself radically
transformed as Platonic science. This resulted in the Platonizing of
Pythagoras: uniquely Platonic insights were regarded as Pythagorean. From Speusippus onwards, it has proved difficult to disentangle
the two traditions.
The fourth century
was also a fertile period for fictional biographies of Pythagoras. The variety
of images of Pythagoras-from shaman to politician, and this same period
was important, too, for the transmission of Pythagorean number symbolism. Since
there was no Pythagorean community after the fourth century, in the Hellenistic
period, Pythagoreanism ceased to be a lived reality, and Pythagoras was
revered, only as a dim memory.
Specimens of
pseudepigraphal Pythagorean writings from the third and second century BCE,simple treat philosophical themes then current in
the Hellenistic period, but are written in an archaizing Greek. The texts tend
to focus on ethical and political themes, not mathematicalor
scientific ones.
That Nigidius Figulus (d. 45 BCE)
played a pivotal part in the reinvention of the philosophy is confirmed by
Varro (116-27 BCE). Eudorus of Alexandria (fl. ca. 25
BCE) wrote a commentary on the Timaeus, in which he opposed the Stoicized readings of Plato found in Antiochus of Ascalon (ca. 130-69/8 BCE) in favor of what he called, a
transcendental Pythagorean, reading.
Juba II (ca.45
BCE-ca. 23 CE), king of Mauretania, was known as an avid collector of
Pythagorean books.Thrasyllus (fl. early 1st c. CE),
a philosopher and astrologer, wrote about the principles of
Pythagoreanism, which he considered as important as Platonism. Also Alexander Polyhistor, who cannot be considered a Pythagorean, wrote a
book on Pythagorean symbols (now lost). This mirrors the more Stoic Cicero, who
decided to translate into Latin the Timaeus, the most "Pythagorean"
work by Plato. Thus, during the Republic and early Empire, Pythagorean themes
had achieved a new kind of respectability in literate Roman society. Some of
this respectability ran parallel to the successes enjoyed by astrology, then a
relatively new science.
Moderatus of Gades (mid-lst c. CE) wrote ten or eleven books on Pythagorean
teaching, attempting to show point by point how Plato derived his doctrines
from Pythagoras. The biography of Apollonius of Tyana
(fl. 1st c. CE) was embellished under the influence of later cultic reverence
and it seems that he styled himself as something of a successor to the
Pythagoras depicted by Heracleides Ponticus. In the second century, Nicomachus
of Gerasa, Numenius of Apamea,
and Theon of Smyma (fl. ca. 115-40 CE) aB wrote mathematical and philosophical texts of
Pythagorean lore. Other authors from this period who ordinarily would not
consider themselves Pythagorean nevertheless frequently appeal to
Pythagoreanism. But those who reinvented this long-Iost
tradition simple introduced new ideas.
The Pythagoreanism of
the Roman Empire is no exception. Three major shifts are worth noting.
When the movement was
resurrected, there was no attempt, to resurrect the communallife
Pythagoras is alleged to have emphasized. The stories of holy men who championed
Pythagoreanism, Iike Apollonius of Tyana and Alexander of Abonuteiehos
(fl. 2nd c. CE), show that the mysticaI, theurgie side of Pythagoreanism was something they took on
individually. Their followers patterned on the religious groups of their own
age, not sixth century Croton. Late antique Pythagoreanism was a literary
ideal, not a lived reality.
Iamblichus of Chalcis
(ca. 245-ca. 325 CE) a student of Porphyry (234-ca. 305 CE), wrote many of his
works with Pythagoras as his model.His On the Pythagorean
Way 0f Life was the first installment of a ten-book series meant to introduce
students to a philosophical and theurgical approach. And with the work of
writers such as Damascius (fl. 4th/5th c. CE),
Proclus (410/12-85 CE), and Macrobius (fl. 5th c.
CE), the literary image of Pythagoreanism flourished in the ages of Islam and
medieval Christianity. By the fourth century, numerology was so prominent that
Iamblichus has Pythagoras teach Abaris "instead
of divination by the entrails of sacrificed anirnals..
.fore-knowledge through numbers, believing this to be purer, more divine, and
more suitable to the heavenly nurnber of the
gods." Hippolytus's Refutation 0f All Heresies(commented on above) is the
next earliest datable text to report numerology, and the technique he describes
is one we find scattered throughout Byzantine manuscripts.
Thus aIthough each of the twenty-four Greek letters could
potentially be assigned the numbers one through twenty-four (and not just a
certain rank in the order of the alphabet), there is no expIicit
evidence that they ever were. The same is true of the twenty-two letters of
various Semitic languages. It shouId then come as no
surprise that there is no explicit evidence of a system of ancient gematria
that uses this sequential system until the Middle Ages, when the actual methods
of gematria develloped.
One type of
"magic" in the case of Pico involved esoteric means (magia naturalis) of text exegesis
that is word-number translations according to Renaissance gematria referred to
in P.1 of this introductory overview. (An in depth Research Report will follow
soon)
Pico clarifies that
in the Persian language magus means "interpreter and worshipper of divine
things" in other words ‘divination’. In fact Christopher Lehrich maintains that,” both in the ritual magic per se
and in the mathematical magic, divination is readily understood as writing, and
indeed is rather difficult to interpret otherwise. Thus the ritual-as-writing
approach goes some way toward clarifying the centrality of divination in
magic.” (Lehrich, The Language of Demons and Angels:
Cornelius Agrippa’s Occult Philosphy, 2003, p. 212).
The magus, as Pico
pictured him, thus was not a transformer of nature but its
"minister." Following the principle that "every inferior nature
is governed by whatever is immediately superior to itself," mankind,
according to Pico, is ruled by the lowest order of angels and in turn is
entrusted with governing the material world. Once the soul has been elevated by
philosophical studies to the contemplative seat of the Cherubim, it is prepared
to rise to God like the Serafim and descend to the world like angelic Thrones,
"well instructed and prepared, to the duties of action." The
operative side of Pico' s magic is best interpreted in terms of the traditional
concepts of cosmic fall and redemption, which are discussed in a Christological
context in the Heptaplus Just as the whole universe
was corrupted by the fall of man--a result of the cosmic correspondences in the
"man the microcosm" concept-so following his mystical purification
homo magus receives the power to raise fallen nature with himself, to
"actuate" and "unite" the cosmos, "to marry the
world"-just as Christ "marries" the soul prepared by philosophy
for the mystical ascent. (See Crofton Black, Pico’s Heptaplus
and Biblical Hermenuetics, 2006).
Thus we can say that
Occultism started with a search in the Bible as “the word of God”,
thought to be 'secretly encoded' with numbers (Gematria). Based on their
observation of the Biblical word of God and Adam who spoke Hebraic Occultists
in fact intended to “restitute” Christianity.
For a possible
difference between Pico's magia naturalis
with Marcello Ficino's magia naturalis
see also:
One could also argue, that Ficino united the philosophy of emanations and the
spirit-lore of the Platonici on the one hand and the
mythology of exaltatio drawn from the Corpus hermeticum on the other. Iamblichus' who also inspired
Pico, suggested that later neoplatonists in fact did
not see the Hermetica and their own philosophy as
isolated from each other. A new type of magus emerged with Bishop Trithemius, in whose thought mystical operations such as
the conjuration of angels mixed with very practical technical purposes, like
telecommunication and distance learning. Since their condemnation by the Church
doubtless induced the "diviners" to dissimulate or at least to keep
silent about their activities it is not easy to know which other divinatory
techniques were really practiced. (See 1)
A believe in Magic of
course is also a cross-cultural category, where it each time has its own
history, its own mythology, its own distinctive culture. Accusations of
'sorcery' as Alexander Rodlach recently pointed out
are more compareable to "conspiracy
theories". (See Rodlach, Witches, Westerners,
and HIV: Aids& Culture of Blame in Africa, 2006).
Christopher Lehrich ads in reference to Giordano Bruno, De umbris idearum ... Ad internam scripturam, & non vulgares per memoriam operationes
explicatis (Paris, 1582): “We need to reread Bruno
and Dee, bearing in mind that they read Agrippa and furthermore were deeply
interested in and influenced by his work. One can already see, I think,
how our understanding of Bruno's ars memorativa as internal writing (scriptura interna) might
change in light of a sophisticated magical-written semiotic. Similarly, [John]
Dee's Monas hieroglyphica will require rethinking, as
Dee claimed for this single hieroglyphic sigil the possibility of a restitution
or restoration of all knowledge and language.- A similar effect will apply,
though less directly, in the history of early modern science. For example,
there has so far as I can tell been little attempt to consider the details of
Agrippa's influence on Paracelsus, although the latter certainly read
Agrippa-indeed, he even entitled one of his own works De occulta philosophia.”
(Lehrich, 2003, p.219-220).
The works of Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, commonly known as Paracelsus
(1493-1541), constituted one of the most important sections in John Dee's
library. (Gyorgy Szonyi,
John Dee’s Occultism, 2004,
p. 132).
Antoine Faivre's definition of western “esotericism” however
is to phenomenological, of the type, "X must have the following
components, and often has the following additional components." Not unlike
the ‘traditionalist’ inspired Mirceau Eliade did with
religion, Faivre apparently believes that esotericism
is sui generis, that it cannot be compared to other phenomena, because he
thinks that true esoteric thought is the path by which modern humanity can
escape or remedy its fallen spiritual condition.
Or as Chris Lehrich aptly mentioned; “What can one do if, like myself,
one is deeply suspicious of a scholarly project rooted in a concealed religious
project, particularly when the technique of concealment involves hypocritical
claims to ‘empirical research, without ideological a priori’ The simple
solution, of course, would be to discard Faivre's
methodology and definition entirely. But, as with Eliade-or Frances Yates for
that maner-this would mean discarding gold along with
the dross. My own preference is to keep the definition, subject to revision of
course, and shift its grounds from some idealized ‘real esotericism’ to the
equally arcane world of academic methodology and theory. In other words, we
simply take the definition to apply to a category, constructed by and for
academics interested in such subjects, which enables analysis and comparison;
conversely, any and all of the components may be set aside when they cease to
be enabling.“ (Lehrich, 2003, p. 163).
Although an idea
common for the ‘human potential’ movement that became so popular in the USA
during the 20th century, the Platonic doctrine that the soul is the artisan of
her own misfortunes, in contrast, widely held among Christians was the
idea that we are all born sinners (because of Adam). The theory that we
inherit it biologically, the entire soul being transmitted to the child in the
father's semen, had already been propounded by Tertullian, and Augustine in the
fifth century.
Freedom, as we
conceive it therefore, was of less concern to such authors than the unity of
the human organism; how, they asked, could those who denied this unity account
for the independent fall of a multitude of beings from perfection, or explain
why soul and body should fare differently in the afterlife when both had been a
party to the same sins?
Thus the Christian
ideal was not a life of conscious and self-authenticating virtue; in a
monotheist it would be idolatrous folly to aspire to be a god or the father of
gods. It was nevertheless an axiom of the New Testament, as of the Old, that
human beings are made in the image of God. Since it appears, in the opening
chapter of Genesis, that God proposed to make Adam in his image and likeness
but gave him only the image at his creation, it was widely held that Christ had
taken flesh to reveal the likeness, and was presently at work in the Christian,
moulding him into the form of a 'perfect man'.
Likeness to god is also the goal of philosophy in Plato's Theaetetus, and there
is no doubt that the outward marks of sanctity in a Christian bear a strong
resemblance to the Platonic virtues. Both Platonists and Christians live as
citizens of an unseen world, eschewing the pleasures and comforts that are
commonly mistaken for goods in this. Both, despising the perishable body, can
meet torture and death without fear; both hold that it is better to suffer an
injury than to do one; both admit that a man who is wise on his own account
will be a fool to his neighbours. For all, their
lives are directed to different ends, for whereas a Christian acts from
obedience to God and in the hope of divine reward, the Platonist believes that
he can fashion his own perfection, and that even if the gods help him for a
season, his salvation is in his own gift rather than theirs. This likeness in
unlikeness is most apparent in those fleeting anticipations of beatitude that
would now be described as mystical experiences.
Augustine -was
perhaps the first to see in Neoplatonism a Christless Christianity, which
demonstrated the unity and incorporeality of the Godhead, offered hints for a
philosophical doctrine of the Trinity, and underwrote the promise of
resurrection with a proof of the immortality of the soul. To humanists of the
Renaissance it served chiefly as an antidote to scholasticism, giving rise in
some hands to a critique of all religion; yet the Anglican divines of the
seventeenth century turned the same arsenal against the materialism and
Unitarianism of Protestant freethinkers.
Spokesmen ofthe episcopal church made common cause with Platonism
against this saturnine 'tragedy of fears' (Enneads 2.9.13.7), affirming both
the goodness of the created order and the soul's power to co-operate with
Christ in her own redemption. Yet there are passages in Paul, not to speak of
sayings ascribed to Jesus, which imply that the salvation of the elect is
foreordained, while in the Gospel of John it is strongly intimated that this
world is lost, and its denizens already separated into children of darkness and
children of light. Was it therefore disingenuous of these critics to seek the
roots of Gnostic thought in Greek philosophies, including Platonism? Not
entirely, because, although they upheld the freedom of the will against the
Stoics, the Platonists also taught that our freedom in the present is
restricted by our remembered choices in past lives. They also held that our
lower world of genesis or becoming is but a copy of one in which there is no
present, past or future; this, they opined, is the soul's true home to which
she can return only by escaping from the body. No more than in Christianity is
there any Gnostic cheapening of the world here. By arguing that the essences of
natural kinds exist above, the Platonist justifies our use of common names for
diverse individuals in the lower sphere; by peopling an invisible realm with
archetypes of justice, beauty and goodness, he affirms the objectivity of
justice, beauty and goodness as we know them. It is better that there should be
a material universe than that matter should remain untouched by form; its flaws
arise inevitably from the truculence of the substrate, not from any primordial
trespass, as in the Gnostic myth or the Biblical tale of Eden. There is thus no
charge to be laid against an omniscient God, no reverie of a 'new earth' in
which the evils of the present will be miraculously annulled (cf. Enneads
2.9.5.25). The Gnostics were, of course, not the only Christians to anticipate
the end of the world, and the following passage, often quoted to illustrate the
optimism which Platonists shared with orthodox Churchmen, also reminds us where
they parted company:
This All that has
emerged into life is no amorphous structure - like those lesser forms within it
which are born night and day out of the lavishness of its vitality - the
Universe is a live organism, effective, all-comprehensive, displaying an
unfathomable wisdom. How, then can anyone deny that it is a clear image,
beautifully formed, of the intellectual Divinities? No doubt it is a copy, not
original; but that is its very nature, it cannot be at once symbol and reality
(Enneads 2.9.8).
In Christian thought
the world bears witness to God not because it resembles him, but (as Augustine
says) because he made it (Confessions 10.6). The image of the Father - his monogenes, unique or only-begotten, is not the world
(Timaeus 92c) but Christ, who framed it before the fall and condescended to
inhabit it, the Word becoming flesh to make all things new (John 1.14 and 1.18;
Revelation 21.5). Christian theology was not required to prove - indeed it
denied - that humans presently live in the best of all possible worlds. Nor, on
the other hand, did it join the Platonists in asserting that it was the worst
of actual worlds. It refused to countenance any theory of Forms outside the
mind of God or any notion of matter as an independent substrate. Some inferred
from the opening chapter of Genesis that God produced matter first and then the
cosmos; some maintained that matter was only logically, not temporally, prior
to the creation; some doubted whether a thing that was defined only by the
absence of such qualities could be said to exist at all. The Greek view of
matter accounted for the discreteness of the world at the cost of denying its
original perfection; Christians affirmed both and traced them to one cause, the
omnipotent will of God. The world, as we have seen, was his creature rather
than his image, and, because the two were so disparate in nature, it was
capable of perfection in its own kind.
This is not to deny
that in Christian thought a distinction can be drawn between the temporal and
the eternal. The Pentateuch states that the tabernacle, the prototype of the
Temple, was fashioned by Moses in accordance with a pattern revealed by God,
and Christian writers constantly recur to this text to corroborate their claim
that the entire Law was designed to foreshadow the mysteries that were openly
proclaimed in the Incarnation.'s Paul himself averred
that, while the things that are seen will pass away, the unseen will endure for ever (2 Corinthians 4.18). Yet he and his readers
differed from the Platonists in that they understood the temporal to be
temporary, the end of the world having been ordained by the same God who had
brought it into being. During this interval creatures lived or died in time
without hope of liberation or return; the eternal was hidden from them, though
not from God, until the final day, and, if there was a sense in which the elect
were already saved, already regenerate, it was only by virtue of the
Incarnation, which was itself an event in time. In Platonism, by contrast, the
distinction between the temporal and the eternal was not chronological but
qualitative. One was subject to change and one exempt from it, but, since there
could be no reason for the eternal to be more productive at one time than at
another, there could be no beginning or end to the vicissitude of the lower
realm, any more than there could be beginning or end in the timeless universe
of Forms. Christians replied that, since there is no time when there is nothing
for it to measure, it is futile to ask why the temporal world was not created
sooner, or for ever.
In Christian thought,
it is not the innate divinity of the mind, or the indefeasible simplicity of
the soul, that secures immortality, but the covenant made with Adam by a benign
creator, who did what he need not have done by framing this one creature in his
image and endowing it with the foretaste or the promise of his likeness. Even
had humanity never fallen, it would have owed its preservation to God and not
to its own capacities; in the fallen state, where moral infallibility is
unattainable, it is only in Christ, the one man who has kept and surpassed the
Law, that Adam's posterity can find the righteousness that brings salvation.
Paul proclaims both the necessity of good works and the insufficiency of all
works (Romans 2.6 and 3.23 etc.); for him there is no virtue in the self-reliant
imitation of God, and still less is it conceivable that the soul might become
its own god. Christians and Platonists might employ the same vocabulary, deny
themselves the same pleasures, sometimes preach the same morality; but they
could never be united, unless a Platonist abjured his belief in his sovereignty
of reason or a Christian came to think that a man-made god would be as powerful
to save him as God made man.
1) AEROMANCY:
Divination interpreting atmospheric conditions. There are several different
forms including:
Austromancy (wind);
Ceraunoscopy (thunder & lightning);
Chaomancy (aerial
visions);
Meteormancy (meteors, especially shooting stars).
AILUROMANCY:
Divination through interpreting the appearance and behavior of cats. A form of
augury.
ALECTORMANCY,
ALECTROMANCY, ALECTRYOMANCY: Divination through interpreting the appearance and
behavior of sacred chickens (originally); current versions include the
interpretation of fowls eating grain and marking the cock's crow as letters are
recited. A form of augury.
ALEUROMANCY:
Divination through sortilege of fortunes written on slips of paper. The
fortunes were inserted into balls of dough that were baked, mixed, and
distributed randomly. This form of divination is the origin of Ash Wednesday
pancakes and fortune cookies. Another version involves the interpretation of
patterns left in a bowl of flour rinsed in water. Aleuromancy was the domain of
Apollo in some traditions.
ALOMANCY: Divination
by interpreting salt. The origin of misfortune associated with spilled salt.
Also known as Halomancy.
ALPHITOMANCY: A
divination practice to identify guilty parties by feeding an individual or
group a loaf of barley. Innocent people would feel no ill effect but guilty
ones would experience indigestion. Alphitomancy was often used to identify
criminals or adulterers. Also known as Cursed Bread.
AMNIOMANCY:
Divination by inspecting and interpreting the caul of a baby at birth.
ANTHROPOMANCY,
ANTINOPOMANCY: Divination interpreting the entrails of human sacrifice. This
practice is obviously illegal and unethical and is not used by pagans today.
Recorded instances of anthropomancy are from ancient Egypt and Rome and were
documented as heinous acts at the time of their occurrences. Also known as Splanchomancy.
APANTOMANCY:
Divination through interpreting any objects (or beings) that happen to present
themselves. A common form of apantomancy is is
interpreting the appearance and behavior of animals during chance meetings (a
form of augury). The superstition associated with a black cat crossing one's
path is apantomancy.
ARACHNOMANCY:
Divination by interpreting the appearance and behavior of spiders. A form of
augury.
ARIOLATER: Someone
who practices divination. Also known as Aruspex, Clairvoyant, Diviner, Haruspex,
Seer, Soothsayer. See Also: Oracle, Prophet, Theomancer.
ARIOLATIO: Divining
by interpreting altars.
ARITHMANCY,
ARITHOMANCY, ARITHMOMANCY: Divination by interpreting numbers. Greeks used the
number and value of the letters in the names of two combatants to predict the
victor. This form of divination has been adopted and modified by many cultures
over the millennia. One of its evolved forms is the current magickal
system of Numerology.
ARITHMOSOPHY:
Divination by Bertiaux's method of converting words
to numbers. A form of Arithmancy and Numerology.
ARMOMANCY: Divining
by inspecting the shoulders of a person. Used originally to determine the
suitability of a person for sacrifice to the gods.
ARUSPEX: See Ariolater.
ARUSPICY: Divination
by interpreting animal entrails. Aruspicy is
sometimes considered to be a form of augury (interpreting form and behavior of
animals). Similar to Anthropomancy (interpretation of human entrails) and Heiromancy (interpretation of sacrificed animals) Also
known as Haruspicy, Extispicy, Extispicium.
ASPIDOMANCY: Divining
by entering casting a circle and summoning an entity.
ASTRAGALOMANCY,
ASTRAGYROMANCY: Divination through the sortilege of sheep bones (originally).
Now commonly done with dice bearing numbers and letters.
ASTROLOGY,
ASTROSOPHY: Divination by interpreting the movements of heavenly bodies,
particularly the major planets.
AUGURY: Often used
synonymously with divination to mean the interpretation of signs and omens.
More accurately, it is divination based on the appearance or behavior of
animals. Includes:
Alectryomancy (chickens);
Arachnomancy (spiders);
Entomomancy (insects);
Hippomancy (horses)
Ichthyomancy (fish);
Myomancy (mice);
Ophiomancy (snakes);
Zoomancy (any animal);
Haruspicy (interpreting animal entrails) is sometimes consider augury.
AUSTROMANCY: Divination by interpreting wind. A form
of aeromancy.
AUTOGRAPHY, AUTOMATIC WRITING, AUTOMATIC SPEAKING:
Spirit communication done unconsciously by an individual often in trance,
obsession or possession states. Automatic communication has occurred with
people in a fully conscious state without their awareness of the action and
distinct personality and knowledge variants (e.g.: fluency in an ancient
language) have been documented. Autography and Automatic Writing apply to
written communication and are also known as Psychography. They are distinct
from Direct Writing where a spirit writes directly without human or mechanical
assistance. All forms are distinct from Psychomancy where the diviner summons
the spirit consciously for communication.
AXINOMANCY, AXIOMANCY: Divination using an axe or
hatchet. Both the handle and the blade are used in various forms.
BELOMANCY: Divination through interpreting arrows.
This type of divination is expressly forbidden in the Koran. Also known as Bolomancy.
BIBLIOMANCY: Originally, the divination used to assess
the guilt or innocence of a person accused of sorcery. The person was weighed
against the great Bible in the Church and if the person weighed less than the
bible they were deemed innocent. Today, bibliomancy refers to divination
interpreting randomly chosen passages in books and is also called stichomancy. The most common form is opening a book to a
random page to answer a question. The Bible is still the most frequently used
book, although any book may be used. Using books by Virgil and Homer
specifically is called stoichemancy. The variant of
using a book of poetry is called rhapsodomancy.
BOLOMANCY: See Belomancy.
BOOK OF CHANGES, The: An ancient Chinese system of
oracular divination that reveals patterns of subtle forces. The questioner is
required to interpret the information provided through deep introspection and
intuitive thought. The Book of Changes dates back to about 2852 B.C. Also known
as I Ching.
BOOK OF THOTH: Tarot Cards.
BOTANOMANCY: A form of pyromancy, interpreting burned
or burning tree branches and leaves. Originally the branches of brier and
vervain were used and the question was carved into the branch. Often used today
to refer to divination by the interpretation of plants.
CAPNOMANCY: Divination by interpreting smoke rising
from a fire, especially sacred fires. A form of pyromancy.
CARROMANCY: Divination by interpreting melting wax
(usually poured into cold water). Also called Ceromancy, Ceroscopy.
CARTOMANCY: Divination using modern playing cards.
Some sources include Tarot and other Divination cards in this category.
CATOPTROMANCY, CATOXTROMANCY, CATTOBOMANCY: Divination
by interpreting images in a reflective or transparent object such as a mirror,
crystal globe or pool of water. The earliest recorded form of catoptromancy
turned a mirror toward the moon to catch moonbeams. Also known as
Crystallomancy, Crystalomancy, Dubjed,
Enoptromancy, Scrying.
CAUSIMOMANCY, CAUSINOMANCY: Divination from observing
the behavior or reactionof objects placed in a fire.
It is a particularly good sign if combustible materials do not catch fire.
CEPHALOMANCY: Divination interpreting the skull or
head of a donkey or goat. Also known as Kephalonomancy.
CERAUNOSCOPY: Divination by interpreting thunder and
lightning. A form of Aeromancy.
CEROMANCY, CEROSCOPY: See Carromancy.
CHAOMANCY: Divination by interpreting aerial visions.
A form of Aeromancy.
CHARTOMANCY: Divination using writing paper.
CHEIROMANCY, CHIROGNOMY, CHIROLOGY, CHIROMANCY:
Divination through analysis of hand shape, fingers, fingernails and the palms.
According to legend, it is one of the oldest Witch skills, taught to mortals by
Aradia, daughter of Lucifer and Diana. Also known as
Palmistry.
CLAIRAUDIENCE: Divination through hearing the future.
Clairaudience is often categorized under the broader heading of Clairvoyance.
CLAIRVOYANCE: Divination through seeing the future.
Clairvoyance specifically refers to the visual image of future events, but
other forms of "seeing" the future are commonly called clairvoyance
including:
Clairaudience (hearing);
Metagnomy (induced through hypnotic trance);
Precognition (inner knowing); and
Psychometry (induced through contact with a physical object).
CLAIRVOYANT: See Ariolater.
CLEDOMANCY, CLEDONOMANCY: Divination by interpreting
random events or statements.
CLEIDOMANCY: A form of radiesthesia (divination using
a pendulum) using a suspended key as the pendulum. Also known as Clidomancy.
CLEROMANCY: Divination by sortilege with dice. It is
sometimes used synonymously with Sortilege (divination by casting or drawing
lots).
CLIDOMANCY: See Cleidomancy.
COSCINOMANCY, COSKIOMANCY: A form of radiesthesia
(divination using a pendulum) using a sieve which was sometimes suspended from
tongs or shears.
CRANIOSCOPY: Divination and character analysis by
studying the shape and structure of the human skull. Also known as Phrenology.
CRITHOMANCY, CRITOMANCY: Divination byinterpreting food, usually cakes and breads, that are
offered in sacrifice.
CROMNIOMANCY: Divination by interpreting onions or
onion sprouts.
CRYSTAL BALL: A crystal sphere used for divination,
especially for scrying. Also called a Showstone.
CRYSTALLOMANCY, CRYSTALOMANCY: See Catoptromancy.
Scrying.
CURSED BREAD: See Alphitomancy.
CYCLOMANCY: Divination by interpreting revolving
wheels.
DACTYLIOMANCY, DACTYLOMANCY: Divination using rings.
Most frequently dactylomancy is done in the form of radiesthesia (divination
using a pendulum) and the ring is suspended over various objects. One form uses
rings of various metals placed on the fingernails in patterns in conjunction
with the planets. Sources indicate it is often used for dowsing.
DAPHNOMANCY: Divination by interpreting a burning
laurel branch. If the fire crackles it is a positive sign. A form of pyromancy.
DEMONOMANCY: Divination by evoking demons to reveal
information.
DENDROMANCY: Divination interpreting trees, especially
oak or mistletoe.
DERVISHING: The practice of whirling into a state of
ecstasy. Sometimes cited as a form of Gyromancy
(divination by interpreting the fall of a person who whirls until they are
dizzy and fall down).
DIRECT WRITING: Term for a spirit writing without
human or mechanical assistance. Distinct from Autography, Automatic Writing and
Psychography which are done through human beings.
DIVINATION: The art of using magickal
tools and symbols to gather information from the Collective unconscious on the
nature of people. places, things, and events in the past, present and future.
Also known as Dukkerin, Dukkering.
DIVINER: See Ariolater.
DIVINING ROD: A forked rod or branched which is used
to for dowsing (locating things underground). Also known as Dowsing Rod.
DOWSING: Divination to find a person, place, thing or
element in buried in the earth. Dowsing will often involve using a pendulum
(radiesthesia) or divining rod (rhabdomancy).
DOWSING ROD: A forked rod or branched which is used to
for dowsing (locating things underground). Also known as Divining Rod.
DUBJED: Tibetan term for Catoptromancy.
DUKKERIN, DUKKERING: Romany term for Divination.
ENOPTROMANCY: See Catoptromancy.
ENTOMANCY: Divination interpreting the appearance and
behavior of insects. A form of augury.
EXTISPICIUM: (See Aruspicy)
A tool used in the practice of exitispicium, exitispicy, aruspicy, haruspicy.
EXTISPICY: See Aruspicy.
FENG SHUI (Chinese, feng shui: "wind and
water"): The ancient Chinese practice of studying and following the
natural currents of the Earth to ensure the proper alignment with them so that
Qi is not disrupted. Feng Shui is used to determine the suitability and layout
of homes, businesses, burial grounds and temples.
FRACTOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the structure
of fractal geometric patterns.
GASTROMANCY: Divination by interpreting the sounds or
signs on the belly. Gastromancy is most frequently
reported as a voice emanating from the belly and it has been dismissed by most
occult investigators as a form of ventriloquism and trickery. An ancient
description of another gastromancy technique
described placing a child in front of a glass filled with water and
illuminating the glass. Divination was done by interpreting the images in the
glass.
GELOSCOPY: Divination by interpreting laughter.
GEMATRIA: A system of discovering truths and hidden
meanings behind words, using numerical values for letters of the alphabet. Each
letter corresponds to a number. The numerical values of words are totaled and
interpreted in terms of other words with the same numerical value. Gematria
dates back to the 8th century B.C. Babylon , and has been used by most mystics
since that time including the Magi, Gnostics, and Quabbalists.
Notarikon is a form of gematria in which the first and last letters of a word
or phrase are put together to create a new word, or to turn a word into a
phrase. Temurah is a form of gematria that creates
anagrams through systematic letter substitutions. See also: Numerology.
GENETHIALOGY: Divination by interpreting the influence
of the stars at birth to predict the future. A form of astrology.
GEOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the Element of
Earth. Forms include scattering and throwing dirt, gravel or sand, interpreting
lines or figures traced in earth, and observation of earth formations. Ley line
interpretation and Feng Shui are forms of Geomancy.
GRAPHOLOGY: Divination and character analysis by
interpreting handwriting.
GYROMANCY: Divination by walking or whirling in a
circle until dizzy and interpreting the point of the person's fall. The circle
used is often laid out with letters. Some sources include Dervishing
(whirling into an ecstasy) as a form of gyromancy.
HALOMANCY: See Alomancy.
HAKATA: Bones, dice, seeds or shells used for
divination.
HARUSPEX: See Ariolater.
HARUSPICY: See Aruspicy.
HEPATOMANCY, HEPATOSCOPY: Divination by examining the
liver of an animal. A form of aruspicy (divination
with animal entrails).
HIEROMANCY, HIEROSCOPY: Divination by interpreting
sacrificial objects such as burnt offerings or slaughtered animals. Similar to aruspicy (interpretation of animal entrails).
HIPPOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the appearance
and behavior of horses. A form of augury.
HOROSCOPE: An astrological chart for a specific person
or group that charts and correlates the signs of the zodiac as they are crossed
by the sun, moon and planets and the position of planets in the twelve
astrological houses.
HOROSCOPY: Divination and character analysis by
interpreting a horoscope.
HYDATOSCOPY: Divination by interpreting rainwater. A
form of Hydromancy.
HYDROMANCY: Divination by interpreting water including
its color, ebb and flow, or ripples produced by pebbles dropped in a pool. Also
known as Ydromancy.
I CHING: See the Book of Changes.
ICHTHYOMANCY:
Divination interpreting the appearance and behavior of fish. A form of augury
(divination by interpreting the appearance or behavior of animals);
Divination interpreting the entrails of fish. A form of aruspicy
(divination by interpreting animal entrails).
IDOLOMANCY: Divination by interpreting idols, images
or figures.
KEPHALONOMANCY: See Cephalomancy.
LAMPADOMANCY: Divination by interpreting a candle or
lamp, usually the flame. A form of pyromancy.
LECANOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the sound or
image of an object or substance falling into a body of water.
LESSER ARCANA: The 56 suit cards in a Tarot deck that
assist in fleshing out the situations indicated by the Trump Cards (Major
Arcana), or indicate smaller occurrences in our lives. Also known as the Minor
Arcana.
LIBRANOMANCY: Divination by interpreting smoke from
incense. A form of capnomancy. Also known as Livanomancy.
LITHOMANCY: Divination using precious or semiprecious
stones either by interpreting light reflected from stones (crystallomancy,
scrying) or casting them and interpreting the way they fall (sortilege).
LIVANOMANCY: See Libranomancy.
LOGARITHMANCY: Divination by interpreting logarithms.
LUNOMANCY: Divination by interpreting moonlight on a
person's face dusted with silver. A form of Selenomancy.
LYCHNOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the flames of
three candles. Similar to Lampodomancy.
MACHAROMANCY: Divination by interpreting knives or
swords.
MAJOR ARCANA: The 22 Trump Cards depicting dominant
occurrences in a Tarot deck.
MARGARITOMANCY: Divination using pearls and
interpreting the light reflected or the way they fall. Similar to Lithomancy.
METAGNOMY: Divination by interpreting visions received
in a trance state.
METEOROMANCY: Divination by interpreting falling stars
(meteors). A form of aeromancy.
METOPOSCOPY: Divination and character analysis through
interpreting facial lines and wrinkles, especially of the forehead.
MINOR ARCANA: See Lesser Arcana.
MOLEOSCOPY, MOLEOSOPHY: Divination and character
assessment by interpreting moles on the body.
MOLYBDOMANCY: Divination by interpreting molten tin or
lead.
MYOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the appearance
and behavior of mice. A form of Augury.
MYRMOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the appearance
and behavior of ants. A form of augury.
NECROMANCY: Divination through communication with
ghosts or corpses. The spirits of the dead are sought for information because
they are supposedly able to access information beyond that available to the
living. Necromantic rites are not practiced in Witchcraft or Wicca. Necromancy
differs from other forms of divination involving contact with spirits because
it is specifically geared to summoning those spirits that are not existing in a
"natural" state and therefore they are assumed to be unhappy and/or
malicious.
NOTARIKON: A form of gematria in which the first and
last letters of a word or phrase are put together to create a new word, or to
turn a word into a phrase. Gematria is a system of discovering truths and
hidden meanings behind words, using numerical values for letters of the
alphabet. Each letter corresponds to a number. The numerical values of words
are totaled and interpreted in terms of other words with the same numerical
value. Gematria dates back to the 8th century B.C. Babylon , and has been used
by most mystics since that time including the Magi, Gnostics, and Quabbalists. Temurah is a form of
gematria that creates anagrams through systematic letter substitutions. See
also: Numerology.
NUMEROLOGY, NUMEROMANCY: The system of magick and divination developed by Pythagoras. In
numerology, all words, names and numbers may be reduced to single digits which
correspond to certain occult characteristics that influence one’s life.
Numerology is used to analyze a person’s character; assess weaknesses,
strengths and natural gifts; predict one’s future and fate; determine the best
place to live; and discover the best times to make decisions and take action.
See also: Gematria.
OCULOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the eye.
OENOMANCY, OINOMANCY: Divination by interpreting wine.
OMEN: A sign, preferably found in nature, that
foretells either good or bad events.
OMPHALOMANCY, OMPHILOMANCY: Divination by interpreting
the navel (bellybutton). Originally omphalomancy involved counting the number
of knots in the umbilical cord to predict how many more children a mother would
have.
ONEIROMANCY, ONIROMANCY: Divination by interpreting
dreams.
ONOMANCY, ONOMOMANCY, ONOMATOMANCY: Divination by
interpreting names.
ONYCHOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the fingernails.
The original form was to study the reflection of the sun in the nails of a
young boy.
OOMANTIA: Divination by interpreting the shape, color,
and patterns (when dyed) of an egg.
OOSCOPY: Divination by nurturing an egg and observing
the hatching of a chick. Often used to determine the sex of an expected child.
OPHIOMANCY: Divination by observing the appearance and
behavior of serpents. A form of augury.
ORACLE: A person who speaks directly to a Deity to
divine or prophesize. Also known as Prophet, Theomancer.
See Also: Ariolater, Aruspex, Clairvoyant, Diviner,
Haruspex, Seer, Soothsayer.
ORNISCOPY, ORINITHOMANCY: Divination by interpreting
the appearance and behavior of birds, especially their flight or song. A form
of augury.
OUIJA, OUIJA BOARD (French, oui:
"yes"; German, ja: "yes"): A divination tool with the
alphabet and numbers laid out on a board. Also called a Spirit Board.
OVOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the yolk of an
egg.
PALLOMANCY: Divination interpreting the movements of
pendulum, often used in dowsing. Different forms of pallomancy
include:
Cleidomancy (using a key);
Coscinomancy (using a sieve);
Dactylomancy (using a ring);
Also known as Radiesthesia.
PALMISTRY: See Cheiromancy.
PAPYROMANCY: Divination by interpreting folding paper.
PEDOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the footprint of
a person, usually encased in clay. A form of podomancy
(interpreting the feet).
PEGOMANCY: Divination by interpreting sacred pools,
springs, wells or fountains. A form of Hydromancy and often used in conjunction
with scrying.
PESSOMANCY: Divination by casting or drawing marked
pebbles or beans. A form of Sortilege. Also known as Psephomancy.
PHRENOLOGY: See Cranioscopy.
PHYLLORHODOMANCY: Divination by interpreting rose
petals. The original form involved slapping a rose petal against the palm of
the hand and interpreting the sound made.
PHYSIOGNOMY: Divination and character analysis by
interpreting the face. Similar to Metoposcopy (interpretation of facial lines).
PODOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the feet.
PRECOGNITION: An an inner
knowledge or vision of future events, especially those that appear to be
inevitable. Similar to Premonition (a vague image or sense of the event).
PREMONITION: A warning of an impending event, experienced
as foreboding, anxiety and intuitive sense of dread. Premonitions tend to occur
before disasters, accidents and deaths. Similar to Precognition (a clear image
of the event).
PROPHECY: A prediction of future events, usually
divinely inspired.
PROPHET: See Oracle.
PSEPHOMANCY: See Pessomancy.
PSYCHOGRAPHY: Spirit communication done unconsciously
by an individual often in trance, obsession or possession states. Automatic
communication has occurred with people in a fully conscious state without their
awareness of the action and distinct personality and knowledge variants (e.g.:
fluency in an ancient language) have been documented. Psychography is the term
applied to written communication and is also known as Autography and Automatic
Writing. Psychography is distinct from Direct Writing where a spirit writes
directly without human or mechanical assistance. All forms are distinct from
Psychomancy where the diviner consciously summons the spirit for communication.
PSYCHOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the soul of a
person, their values, beliefs and morals. Also known as Soul Reading.
PSYCHOMETRY: Divination by interpreting an object to
obtain information about its history and/or owner. Considered to be a form of
clairvoyance and often used to locate missing persons or to assist in solving
crime. The term was coined in the mid-nineteenth century by Joseph R. Buchanan,
an American physiologist.
PYROMANCY: Divination by interpreting fires, flames or
burning objects. There are many different forms of pyromancy including:
Botanomancy (burning branches and leaves);
Capnomancy (smoke);
Causinomancy (burning flammable objects);
Daphnomancy (burning a laurel branch);
Lampadomancy (lamps or candles);
Pyroscopy (burning paper);
Sideromancy (burning straw).
PYROSCOPY: Divination by interpreting burning paper. Originally, pyroscopy was the interpretation of the stains left on a
light surface after burning paper, current practice includes observation of the
paper as it burns. A form of pyromancy.
RADIESTHESIA: See Pallomancy.
RHABDOMANCY: Divination using a stick, wand or
divining rod. Rhabdomancy is often used in dowsing.
RHAPSODOMANCY: Divination by interpreting randomly
chosen passages in a book of Poetry. The most common form is opening a book to
a random page to answer a question. The variant of using any book is called
bibliomancy or stichomancy and using books by Virgil
and Homer is called stoichemancy.
ROADOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the stars.
SCAPULOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the patterns,
cracks and fissures of the burned shoulder blade of an animal. Sometimes
considered to be a form of augury (divination by interpreting the appearance
and behavior of animals). Also known as Spatulamancy.
SCATOMANCY: Divination by interpreting excrement. A
form of Spatalamancy (divination by interpreting
skin, bones or excrement).
SCIAMANCY, SCIOMANCY: Divination by communication with
spirits. Distinct from Necromancy in that the spirits are voluntary
participants in the divination.
SCRYING: See Catoptromancy.
SEER: See Ariolater.
SELENOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the appearance
and phase of the moon.
SHOWSTONE: See Crystal Ball.
SIDEROMANCY: Divination interpreting straw placed on a
hot iron surface. A form of pyromancy (divination interpreting fire).
SKATHAROMANCY: Divination by interpreting the tracks
of a beetle crawling over a grave, especially that of a murder victim. A form
of augury (interpreting the appearance or behavior of animals).
SOOTHSAYER: See Ariolater.
SORTILEGE: Divination by casting or drawing lots.
There are many types of sortilege including:
Astraglomancy (sheep bones);
Belomancy (arrows);
Bibliomancy (books);
Cleromancy (dice);
Pessomancy (pebbles);
Rhapsodomancy (poetry);
Stichomancy (books);
Sometimes known as Cleromancy.
SOUL READING: See Psychomancy.
SPATALAMANCY: Divination by interpreting skin, bone or
excrement.
SPATULAMANCY: See Scapulomancy.
SPIRIT BOARD: See Ouija.
SPLANCHOMANCY: See Anthropomancy.
SPODANOMANCY, SPODOMANCY: Divination by interpreting
ashes, soot or cinders, usually from sacrificial fires or burnt offerings. Also
known as Tephramancy, Tephromancy or Tuphramancy.
STAREOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the Elements.
STERNOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the area
between the breast and belly (solar plexus).
STICHOMANCY: See Bibliomancy.
STOICHEMANCY: Divination by interpreting randomly
chosen passages in books by Virgil and Homer. A form of Bibliomancy.
STOLISOMANCY: Divination by interpreting people's
clothing and style.
SYCOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the response of
a written question to moisture. Originally, questions were written on fig
leaves, the slower the leaf dried out, the more favorable the prediction.
Today, sycomancy is done with paper (observing the response to steam) or tree
leaves (observing the drying time).
TAROT: Divination by interpreting a set of
cards.
TAROLOGIST: A person who divines using Tarot cards.
TASSEOGRAPHY, TASSEOMANCY: Divination by interpreting
tea leaves and coffee grounds.
TEMURAH: A form of gematria that creates anagrams
through systematic letter substitutions. Gematria is a system of discovering
truths and hidden meanings behind words, using numerical values for letters of
the alphabet. Each letter corresponds to a number. The numerical values of
words are totaled and interpreted in terms of other words with the same
numerical value. Gematria dates back to the 8th century B.C. Babylon , and has
been used by most mystics since that time including the Magi, Gnostics, and Quabbalists. Notarikon is a form of gematria in which the
first and last letters of a word or phrase are put together to create a new
word, or to turn a word into a phrase. See also: Numerology.
TEPHRAMANCY, TEPHROMANCY: See Spodanomancy.
THEOMANCY: Divination through direct contact with a
Deity. Practitioners are usually referred to as Oracles, Prophets or Theomancers.
THEOMANCER: See Oracle.
THERIOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the movement
of groups of animals (e.g.: flocks of geese, herds of cattle). A form of augury
(divination by interpreting the appearance or behavior of animals).
TIROMANCY: Divination by interpreting the coagulation,
especially holes, in cheese. Also known as Typomancy,
Tyromancy.
TUPHRAMANCY: See Spodanomancy.
TYPOMANCY, TYROMANCY: See Tiromancy.
URIMANCY, UROMANCY: Divination by interpreting urine.
URIM V'TUMIM: Divination by interpreting the sacred
stones attached to the breast plate of a ‘High Priest’.
XENOMANCY: Divination by interpreting meetings with
strangers.
XYLOMANCY: Divination by interpreting kindling or
other wood pieces that can be found ready for burning. Interpretations include
where they are found, their shape and type or how they burn.
YDROMANCY: See Hydromancy.
ZOOMANCY: Divination by interpreting the appearance
and behavior of animals. Synonymous with one of the definitions of augury.
ZYGOMANCY: Divination by using weights, the original
form of Bibliomancy (being weighed against the Bible) is a form of zygomancy.
For updates
click homepage here