By Eric Vandenbroeck
When the Romans Went to China
For some time it has
been known that Chinese records provide a considerable amount of information
on Daqin Daqin 大秦 i. e. Great Qin (synonym of Roman
Empire in Chinese records). Nevertheless, the interpretation of these
accounts requires a more coherent nexus.
Looking at the
potential relationships between ancient Greece Rome and second-century China it
has been established that the influx of many people from the Near East and
areas that were part of the Silk Road. Already
mentioned by contemporary Greek historian Herodotus where the Tocharians (modern Xinjiang) whose languages are the
easternmost group of Indo-European languages. Caucasoid mummies have been found
in various locations in the Tarim Basin such as Loulan, the Xiaohe Tomb
complex, and Qäwrighul. "Tocharian"
was given to them by modern scholars, who identified their speakers with a
people who inhabited the important area of Bactria from the
2nd century BC, and
were known in ancient Greek sources as the Tókharoi (Latin Tochari). This subject of the relationship
between China Ancient Greece and Rome has during the past few years been
intensively studied by specialized historians like for example also Randolph B.
Ford who recently completed a book soon to be published by Cambridge University
Press:
The historical
reconstruction of the trans-Eurasian ‘Silk Roads’ has been the archaeological
documentation coupled with the comparative analysis of the written sources,
that is to say, those of the Roman and the Chinese authors. It has been argued
that from a historiographical perspective, it must be stressed that ‘the
invention of the Silk Roads’ was from the very beginning deeply
associated with the History of the Roman Empire.
The Silk roads to the
Mediterranean combined maritime and overland itineraries. From the production
centers in the territories of North-Western China, the caravans moved westward
through the overland roads of the Tarim basin. From the Pamir Mountains, silk
passed through Bactria, avoiding Parthia, and then down the Hindu Valley to the
Northern India ports. The Periplus testifies the existence of silk and silk
products in the Indian ports of the Western and Eastern coasts of India. From Muziris different routes could be taken: the most direct
was crossing the Indian Ocean to reach the Egyptian ports on the Red Sea, then
across the desert up to Alexandria. Another possible route was leading carriers
to the port of Charax Spasinou
on the Persian Gulf, and then across the desert to Palmyra. From this important
city (a key hub for the caravan trade), the silk was then taken to the Syrian
cities of Tyre, Sidon, Antiochia,
famous centers for textile manufacturing.
Indian merchants
provided Roman business people with some necessary information about the
location of China. Roman seafarers used the stars to determine the position of
distant countries and plot the direction of sea crossings. Night journeys
across featureless desert landscapes were also made using the constellations as
a guide.¹ Greek pilots, therefore, tried
to connect Indian information on China with star patterns that might reveal the
global position of this distant country. The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea
suggests that ‘Thinalies right under Ursa Minor and
must be on the same level as the outer parts of the Pontus (Black Sea) and the
Caspian’ (AD 50).² Based on this
perspective, China was thought to be on the same latitude as the Caspian Sea in
a location just slightly north of its correct position.
A concise history of the Roman contact with China
As ocean commerce
developed, Roman ships began sailing around the southern tip of India to reach
city-ports in the Ganges and Burma. But these Roman voyages remained within the
Indian Ocean since the 1,000-mile-long Malay Peninsula was a significant barrier
that hindered ventures further east. Roman ships were dependent on seasonal
weather. Once the northeast monsoon began to blow in November, it was time for
them to sail back across the ocean to Egypt. ³ This timeframe discouraged any
Roman voyages around the Malay Peninsula to investigate the lands that lay
beyond.
In the early second
century AD, a Greek sailor named Alexandros gathered details from Indian
merchants who sailed to a site on the northern part of the Malay Peninsula
called Tamala. From Tamala, travelers trekked 100 miles across the narrow Kra Isthmus and boarded other Indian vessels on the eastern
seaboard. These ships were outfitted to cross the Gulf of Thailand, and their
Indian crews sailed to Cambodia and Vietnam in search of new trade
opportunities. When they reached the southern tip of Vietnam some of these
ships sailed south into the open sea and made the crossing to Borneo.⁴ Ancient
Borneo was an extensive jungle forested island that was almost as large as Asia
Minor (modern Turkey). Indian ships
making landfall on the 700-mile-long northern coast of Borneo were therefore
unsure if the landmass was an island or some southern extension of the Asian
continent.
The Periplus written
by Alexandros has not survived, but it provided Claudius Ptolemy with most of
the geographical data he used to map the southeast edge of Asia. Using this
information, Ptolemy locates ‘Sinae’ (Han China) in a narrow band of territory on
the very edge of the Asian continent. However, Ptolemy made errors in his
reconstruction of the Far East. He theorized that the northern coast of Borneo
was part of the Asian continent and therefore made the seaboard of Sinae extend
southeast to enclose the entire southern ocean.⁵
The Maes Titianus Expedition
For centuries the
overland Silk Routes around the Tarim Basin provided a conduit through which
Chinese goods reached Bactria, India, and Parthia. Only one Roman merchant
group is reported to have ventured into Central Asia and followed the Tarim
routes to the Chinese Empire. The group was sent by a Roman entrepreneur named
Maes Titianus sometime around AD 100. But this contact was exceptional and was
only made possible due to particular circumstances that arose between the
leading ancient empires.
In the late first
century AD, the Han general Ban Chao restored Chinese authority over the Tarim
kingdoms using a combination of diplomacy and military force (AD 74–97). By AD
84, Ban Chao had secured Kashgar, and the Han could
re-establish direct political contacts with the Yuezhi in Bactria (the Kushan
Empire). Chinese rule created stability on the silk routes and prevented
intervening regimes from hindering travel, or monopolizing various sections of
the caravan trails that led across the Tarim territories. In AD 87 the
Parthians responded to these developments by sending an embassy to China which
was received by the Han Emperor Zhang.⁶
They returned with
oriental merchandise and brought new information about the Chinese Empire back
to the Parthian capitals at Ecbatana in Iran and Ctesiphon in Babylonia.
These events probably
motivated Maes Titianus to plan his own commercial venture into Central Asia.
Sometime around AD 100, Maes arranged for a team of commercial agents to travel
along the Parthian caravan routes that led from Iran into Afghanistan. This
Roman group journeyed through the northern part of the Kushan Empire towards
the Tarim territories. Somewhere near the Pamirs, they were intercepted by Han
authorities who took them eastward through the Tarim kingdoms to China. The
bewildered Romans were delivered to the Chinese capital Luoyang and brought
before the Han Emperor He. On their return to the Roman Empire, the group
offered an account of their exploits to Maes who wrote a report for his
business colleagues. This account was read by educated Greeks and Romans,
including geographers who extracted names, distances, and directions from work.
One of these geographers was a mathematician named Marinus, who came from the
Syrian city of Tyre. This is significant because Tyre was famous for its fabric industries and the city was
a leading participant in the international silk trade.⁷ The original report by
Maes has not survived into modern times, but Claudius Ptolemy copied the data
collected by Marinus. Ptolemy used the information from Maes to construct new
maps of the Far East and determine the geographical position of the people that
the Romans called the Sinae (the Chinese).⁸
Claudius Ptolemy
describes Maes as ‘a Macedonian who was also called Titianus and was the son of
a merchant and a merchant himself’.⁹ Maes was a Syrian name, and the nomen
‘Titianus’ indicates that he came from a family granted Roman citizenship by a
man called Titian. Therefore Maes Titianus was a Macedonian who spoke Greek,
but he came from a family of businessmen who claimed elements of both Syrian
and Roman identity. Maes could have inherited his Roman citizenship from an
ancestor who served a leading politician named Marcus Titius.¹⁰ Titius was the
Roman governor of Syria in 13 BC, and on the orders of Emperor Augustus he helped facilitate an
important peace settlement with the
Parthians. This was the agreement whereby the Parthian King Phraates IV
sent several of his young sons and grandsons to Rome as political wards of the
Roman Emperor.¹¹ Strabo describes how Marcus received four children, four
grandchildren and two daughters-in-law of the Parthian King. He took
responsibility for the safety and wellbeing of these Parthian royals from the
time they crossed into Syria until their transfer to Rome.¹²
Marcus Titius would
have sent trusted Syrian servants to the Parthian capital Ctesiphon to convey
messages and arrange for the safe conduct of the royal family. Marcus probably
granted some of these servants Roman citizenship, and as freedmen, they could
have used their knowledge and political connections to create successful
commercial businesses. They had high-status contacts in Ctesiphon who could
acquire silk batches for dispatch to the cities of Roman Syria. Maes Titianus
was probably from one of these merchant families, a Roman citizen with
connections to the Parthian nobility, which ensured that his business requests
would be granted. In this particular context, he was able to arrange for some
of his commercial agents to join a Parthian caravan as it headed out across
Iran towards Bactria and the Kushan Empire.
Claudius Ptolemy
explains the route taken by the Maes group.
The first stage in the expedition was a journey across the Parthian
Empire from the Euphrates frontier to Merv on the eastern edge of Iran. Before
the onset of summer, Parthian caravans would have left the hot and humid city
of Ctesiphon and headed east to the seasonal capital of Ecbatana in the drier
and cooler climate of Media.¹³ This was a journey of about 250 miles through
passes in the Zagros Mountains which
formed the outer fringe of the Iranian
Plateau. Caravans followed this route in springtime when snows from the
mountains melted and provided temporary streams of water for the benefit of
travelers and their horse-mounted escorts.
The multi-walled city
of Ecbatana offered accommodation and supplies to the Parthian caravans that
crossed ancient Iran. From Ecbatana, the route headed north across the Iranian
plateau towards the coast of the Caspian Sea. This was a journey of about 200
miles through mountain valleys that descended towards the narrow seaboard of Hyrcania. Hyrcania was a
300-mile-long belt of low-lying territory between the mountains and the Caspian
shore. This plain of fertile land was a
vital corridor for east-west travel as it offered caravans a well-provisioned
route around the eastern section of the Iranian Plateau. On the edge of Hyrcania, the merchant caravans passed through the Iranian
city of Hecatompylos. This was the first capital
created by the Parthians (the Parni) when they migrated from the Central Asian
steppe to settle in northeast Iran (238–209 BC).
The caravan route
from Hecatompylos (Qumis) to the Parthian frontier at
Merv covered more than 450 miles across arid terrain. Merv was the last major outpost of the
Parthian Empire, and from there, caravans would have entered Kushan territory
and headed 300 miles east to the Bactrian capital Bactra (Balkh). Centuries
earlier, Bactria had been part of a Greek kingdom that included an urban
population descended from Macedonian colonists (256–140 BC). Perhaps the Maes group was able to
exploit a shared Macedonian heritage to pass unhindered through this
region.
In AD 100, there was
peace between Parthian Iran and the Kushan Empire, which ruled in ancient
Afghanistan. This meant that caravans were able to pass unobstructed between
their realms and the Parthian merchants that reached Bactra (Balkh) were
permitted to travel eastward to the Pamir Mountains. It was a journey of about
00 miles between Bactra and a trade outpost on the Kushan frontier known as the
Stone Tower (Tashkurgan). The Stone Tower was a
meeting-ground for the steppe peoples that Claudius Ptolemy calls the
‘Scythians.’ Ptolemy calculated that the entire route from Ctesiphon to the
Stone Tower covered about 26,280 stadia, which is equivalent to about 2,600
miles.¹⁴ Caravans can travel up to 15 miles per day, but with frequent rest
periods, the journey would have taken up to six months.
The Stone Tower trade
outpost in the Pamir Mountains was about 250 miles from the oasis city of Kashgar on the edge of the Tarim Basin. Perhaps the Roman
merchants sent by Maes expected to conclude their trade dealings at this
distant site and then begin the long trek home to Syria. But in AD 100, Kashgar was a protectorate of the Han Empire, and Chinese
observers were active on this new frontier. The Protector General Ban Chao was
planning his retirement and wanted to impress the Han Emperor by returning to
Luoyang with a range of foreign peoples from western countries beyond the Tarim
territories. By chance, the Roman merchants were at the Stone Tower when Han
agents were searching for external representatives who could give an account of
their distant homelands to the imperial court. As a result, the Maes group was
brought to the offices of Ban Chao in the Tarim kingdoms where they accepted
the opportunity to travel onward to Luoyang.¹⁵
The Maes merchants
spoke Greek and were found by Chinese agents near a country that had once been
ruled by Hellenic dynasties (Bactria). They were also traveling with Parthian
merchants and so did not identify themselves as Roman. This meant that Chinese
authorities were not aware they were dealing with subjects of Da Qin (the Roman
Empire). The Maes merchants were conveyed 600 miles across the Tarim kingdoms
by a Chinese military escort and brought through the Jade Gate to the
600-mile-long Hexi a corridor that led into inner China and the 400-mile route
to Luoyang.15
This part of the
journey revealed the accurate scale of eastern Asia to Roman geographers.
Ptolemy reports, ‘The distance from the Stone
Tower to Sera, the capital of the Seres, is a journey of seven months,
estimated at 36,200 stadia.’¹⁶ This distance was about 3,600 miles and suggested that a journey from
the Euphrates to central China could be completed in about twelve months, or a
full year of travel. Consequently, anyone making the round trip would be absent
from their homeland for at least two years.
Maes wrote a full
account of the journey taken by his business agents, but only the briefest
summary of this work survives in the map-based discussion given by Claudius
Ptolemy. Ptolemy describes how the Maes group journeyed for seven months
through lands that were previously unknown to any Greek or Roman authority. As
they traveled through the Tarim territories, the agents kept to a route
‘subject to violent storms’ until, at the end of their journey,
they entered the
capital of the Seres. This was the imperial city of Luoyang, and the Maes group
found themselves in the company of dozens of envoys from Central Asia who had
come to pay honor to the Chinese Court.¹⁷
The Chinese history,
known as the Hou Hanshu, reveals the incident from the Han perspective and
dates this encounter to AD 100. It seems
that the Maes group described themselves as Macedonians and explained the long
distance between their Syrian homelands and the Chinese Empire. This
information translated for the imperial court, and the Chinese scribes entered
in their records that the Maes group came from a previously unknown region
called Meng-chi Tou-le (Macedonia–Tyre). The Hou
Hanshu reports: ‘the distant States of Mengchi and
Tou-le came to make their submission by sending envoys to bring tribute.’¹⁸ The
Chinese were informed that the route
from Meng-chi Tou-le to the Han capital at Luoyang covered a distance of more
than 10,000 miles (40,000 li). This made these western territories the most
distant region in contact with the Chinese regime and placed Meng-chi Toule within the Roman Empire.
The Maes merchants
followed the protocol practiced by foreign envoys and were permitted into the
imperial palace to offer formal submission to Emperor He.
The group was
carrying lightweight silks that had been rewoven in Syrian workshops and had
some imperial gold coins that bore the image of the Roman Emperor. The Hou
Hanshu reports that the representatives from Mengchi
Tou-le ‘brought silks and the gold seal
of their ruler’.¹⁹ There were dozens of visiting envoys offering tribute at
this time, and the Maes group was accepted as just another party of exotic
foreigners from a minor power on the western edge of Asia. They would have
received the finest Han silks as diplomatic gifts before being escorted back to
the Stone Tower to begin their long return journey to Syria.
The report written by
Maes described a journey to the Far East that challenged the traditional view
of Central Asia as a place occupied by monsters and cannibals.
The expedition
confirmed the existence of robust and well-organized kingdoms on the eastern
edge of Asia. This new awareness of China could explain a comment made by
Juvenal when he complains that Roman women were interfering in traditional male
interests by interrupting generals with the question, ‘what are the intentions
of the Chinese?’²⁰
The Maes report
suggested unique opportunities for the development of distant commerce and the
advancement of Roman knowledge. For the first time, Roman subjects in Syria and
Egypt knew for sure that there was an Asian superpower in the Far East that manufactured
large quantities of silk and steel. Reports of the Maes expedition spread
through Roman Syria at a time when Roman Emperor Trajan was engaged in
conquering Dacia (AD 101–106). Perhaps knowledge of these distant contacts and
the value of eastern commerce encouraged the Emperor to plan the conquest of
Parthia.
The Antun Embassy
Chinese sources
record that in AD 166, a Roman ship sailed around the Malay Peninsula and
crossed the Gulf of Thailand to reach the South China Sea.
The Roman crew then
sailed north along the coast of Vietnam and docked at a Chinese military
outpost called Rinan. The Rinan Commandery (in what is now central Vietnam) was
on the southern periphery of the Han Empire, where the Red River flowed into
the Gulf of Tonkin. Its Han commander allowed the Roman crew to come ashore and
made arrangements for some of their personnel to be escorted to the Chinese
court at Luoyang.
This contact between
China and Rome appears in a brief encyclopedia-like entry in the Hou Hanshu in
the section marked ‘Da Qin’.²¹ The author was interested in descriptive facts
and did not think it was relevant to explain the purpose of this contact. Unfortunately,
this brief account is all that survives regarding this first meeting between
the Han court and representatives from Rome. This event was a prime opportunity
for the exchange of significant commercial, cultural, and technological
innovations between the two ancient civilizations. But the contact had no
long-term impact, and Chinese accounts provide the only record of these Roman
representatives reaching Han China. This suggests that the Roman crew may not
have made it safely back to Egypt on a sea voyage that would have spanned a
quarter of the globe and crossed 8,000 miles of ocean.²²
The arrival of Roman
subjects in China was probably connected with events in AD 162 when the
Parthian King Vologases IV invaded the Roman client kingdom of Armenia and
installed his candidate on the throne. In response, the Roman governor of
neighboring Cappadocia, Marcus Sedatius Severianus,
marched his legion into Armenia to restore imperial order. But the Roman army
was outflanked, encircled, and massacred by a large force of Parthian horse
riders. This meant that Emperor Marcus Aurelius was forced to declare a state
of war between their regimes. After almost fifty years of peace on the eastern
frontiers, the Roman and Parthian Empires prepared for full-scale military
conflict.²³
As the situation
escalated, the Romans probably decided to threaten Parthian interests by making
direct contact with robust regimes in the distant east. This would have
included the Kushan Empire in Afghanistan and the Caspian kingdom of Hyrcania, which had split from the main Parthian realm. The
usual route chosen for this type of diplomatic contact was through Egypt and
its Red Sea connection with India. Roman business people were probably given
state messages to deliver to foreign rulers, and envoys from distant kingdoms
were offered safe passage on Roman trade vessels are sailing to and from the
Indus region.
These contacts had
proved valuable in the reign of Nero when the Roman legions fought
Parthian-backed forces for control of Armenia (AD 58–63). Roman successes in
this war were aided by eastern conflicts that drew the Parthian military
workforce away from the Armenian campaign. Tacitus reports, ‘Our successes were
more easily gained because the Parthians were fully occupied with the Hyrcanian
War. The Hyrcanians sent messages to the Roman
Emperor asking for an alliance, and as a pledge of goodwill, they explained how
they had detained the Parthian King in the east.’ For their return journey,
these envoys were given quarters on the Roman ships that sailed from Egypt to
the Indus kingdoms. Tacitus explains how the Roman commander Corbulo ‘was concerned that the deputies would be
intercepted at the enemy’s outposts when they crossed the Euphrates. So he
escorted them and conducted them down to the shores of the Red Sea, and they
returned safely to their native lands by avoiding Parthian territory.’²⁴ These
envoys would have traveled through the Kushan Empire from the Indus kingdoms to
the northern frontiers of Afghanistan and from there to Hyrcania
on the eastern shores of the Caspian Sea.
The Romans probably
used this same merchant network in AD 163 to contact distant regimes opposed to
the Parthian rule. But this time, it seems that the Emperor decided to contact
the Seres (Chinese) and send Roman representatives to the Far East. Perhaps
Marcus Aurelius wanted to establish contact with the mysterious steel-equipped
empire described by Maes Titianus.
In the spring of AD
163, the co-emperor Lucius Verus arrived in Syria to prepare the Roman legions
for war against Parthia. Around the same time, arrangements were made for a
Roman delegation to sail from a Red Sea port in Egypt to contact the Seres. Their
first point of contact was the Kushan Empire, which had dealings with China via
the overland Silk Routes. But by this period, the Tarim kingdoms were no longer
subject to the Han rule, and the Kushan could not guarantee safe passage
through Central Asia.
An alternative route
to China was to cross the entire Indian Ocean and sail around the Malay
Peninsula to reach the Gulf of Thailand and the South China Sea.
Indian merchants had
recently discovered this route when they explored the north coast of Vietnam.
Han accounts record that in AD 160 a regent from one of the Indus kingdoms
managed to send envoys to southern China using this new maritime route.²⁵ The
discovery of this sea passage offered an important new avenue for long-range
diplomatic and commercial contacts. The Roman envoys, who were probably senior
merchants, were sent east by Marcus Aurelius to confirm the existence of this
route and establish a direct connection with the Han government.
The Romans spent the
winter of AD 165 in an eastern port before resuming their voyage at the onset
of the summer monsoon winds in AD 166. From Burma, they sailed 1,000 miles down
the Malay Peninsula and through the treacherous Malacca Strait to enter the
Gulf of Thailand. From Thailand, it was 500 miles to the southern tip of
Vietnam and then a further 1,000 miles around the southeast coast of Asia to
reach Rinan on the south edge of the Han Empire. Rinan was a Chinese military
outpost established close to where the Red River flowed into the Tonkin Gulf
(near modern Hanoi). The Roman crew probably arrived at Rinan in the late
summer of AD 166, after spending over fourteen months at sea or in various
foreign ports.
Rinan was managed by
a Han administrator who oversaw Chinese interests in the region and had
authority over the local rulers. In AD 166, the Han government had just
restored order in the Rinan Commandery following a short series of military
mutinies.²⁶ Consequently, the Romans who arrived at the port would have seen
numerous military personnel dressed in strange uniforms and carrying unfamiliar
weaponry. The travelers must have realized that they were dealing with a vast
militarized empire similar to Rome.
The Chinese commander
at Rinan recognized the significance of the Roman visitors, and they were
immediately dispatched under guard to Luoyang, along with cargo samples removed
from the ship. The journey from Rinan to Luoyang was more than 1,200 miles, which
is almost the same distance as from Egypt to Italy.
Travel across China
was conducted mainly through a network of wide roads, and the Roman group would
have been conveyed in official carriages accompanied by a small escort of
Chinese cavalry. The leading Chinese highways were over 50 feet wide, which
made them twice the size of the most important Roman roads. A paved lane in the
center of these highways was reserved for state carriages and dispatch
riders.
Postal offices were
situated on the main routes, and these managed the conveyance of messages and
kept records of dispatches. Every 6 miles, there were Cantonal offices staffed
by soldiers who policed the area and monitored traffic. At 10 mile intervals,
postal stations provided couriers and state officials with fresh horses and
offered facilities for overnight accommodation.²⁷ But even with these
advantages, the journey north to the
inland capital of Luoyang must have taken several weeks of fast-paced and
relentless travel.
On their way north,
the Romans would have seen the tall watchtowers in the Chinese countryside,
which served as multi-story grain silos. They also had an opportunity to
observe the formidable defensive walls that surrounded Han cities. These cities
had none of the monumental stone-built classical buildings that a Greek or
Roman might expect to see in an important urban center. Instead, the upper
stories of the most significant Chinese buildings were constructed entirely
from ornately carved wood supporting bright terracotta tiles.
Roman travelers would
have noticed other cultural differences. In China, thick silk fabrics were worn
by poor people of low status, including orphans and widows who were offered
essential clothing as handouts by the state. High-quality steel was a rarity in
the Roman Empire, but in China, it was used both for battle gear and standard
work tools. In Roman domains, the image of the Emperor was widely produced on
coins, army emblems, and public statues. But the Chinese did not display
reverence in the same manner. During their weeks of travel through China, the
Roman envoys might have wondered if the Han Emperor would be a soldier-general
like Trajan, or perhaps a philosopher statesman like Marcus Aurelius.
When the Romans
reached Luoyang, they were probably taken to an administrative headquarters
within the imperial palace for assessment. A vast civil service managed China,
and the Han palace complex in Luoyang resembled a self-contained city filled
with scholars, archivists, ministers, and bureaucrats. Han officials might have
summoned translators from the Indian merchant community resident at Luoyang, or
perhaps asked assistance from one of the Buddhist temples that had been
established within the city. There were also members of the Parthian nobility
living in Luoyang who were associated with Silk Route commerce and the
propagation of Buddhism.²⁸ The sight of Han officials in the company of
these Parthian nobles would have been
highly disconcerting for the Roman envoys.
After careful
questioning, the Roman delegates were granted an audience with the Han Emperor
and summoned to the inner court. As part of this protocol, the Han officials
subjected the Romans to a list of stock questions designed to ascertain the
scale and character of their regime. According to Chinese records, the
delegates claimed to represent ‘Antun,’ which is a reference to the ruling
Roman household and the Emperor Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. The Chinese
recognized that Rome had a ruling political family similar to the Han dynasty
and shortened the dynastic name Antonine to ‘Antun.’
The Antonine
delegates confirmed that there was a direct overland route to the Roman Empire
that passed through Parthian territory. They told the Chinese that the Roman
regime had been trying to send representatives to China, but their efforts had
been blocked by the Parthians who wanted to maintain control of the overland
silk trade. Further questions concerned the profits that Roman merchants made
from their trade ventures to India. The Chinese probably asked the envoys about
the military strength of the Roman Empire, as this is an essential feature in
most Han reports concerning foreign powers. However, the envoys did not reveal
Roman military numbers or explain their methods of warfare. Maybe they thought
it was unwise to disclose this information to a foreign power, or perhaps the
presence of Parthians in the Han court inhibited their response.
It was customary for
embassies to offer exotic and expensive diplomatic gifts to foreign rulers as
tokens of respect and measures of prestige. Even trade delegations followed
this practice in order to begin successful commercial negotiations with foreign
governments. However, it seems that the Antonine group had no valuable
ambassadorial gifts to present to the Han court and no high-value Roman
merchandise to hand over as diplomatic offerings. This cannot have been an
oversight, so the Romans may have lost their prepared gifts during some
previous encounters. Perhaps they were compelled to part with these items by
some foreign ruler at one of the eastern kingdoms they had visited on route to
China. This could have been the price they paid for a safe-harbor during the
preceding winter.
In place of Roman
gifts, they offered the Han Emperor the cargo samples that had been removed
from their ship and conveyed to the palace at Luoyang. These items were a
collection of ordinary eastern merchandise that disappointed the Han officials.
Based on existing reports from the silk routes, the Han were expecting to
receive gemstone jewelry, objects fashioned from delicate red coral, or
exquisite western fabrics dyed vibrant colors. The Hou Hanshu records: ‘Antun
the ruler of Da Qin, sent envoys from beyond the frontiers to reach us through
Rinan. They offered us elephant tusks, rhinoceros horns, and turtle shells.
This was the very first time there was ever communication [between our
countries.
The Antonine envoys
offered no explanation for their lack of appropriate diplomatic gifts and this
caused concern in the Han court. All previous reports collected by the Han
government suggested that Rome was as powerful as the Chinese Empire, so the
absence of suitable diplomatic offerings was suspicious. This was viewed as a
possible lack of commitment by the Romans or a sign that their empire was not
as wealthy as existing reports claimed. The Hou Hanshu comments, ‘The tribute
they brought was neither precious nor rare, raising suspicion that the accounts
of Rome might be exaggerated.’²⁹
In 1885 a German
scholar named Friedrich Hirth translated this passage and assumed that the
Chinese were ‘suspicious’ about the delegates. He suggested that the envoys
were opportunist Roman merchants who offered trade cargo as diplomatic
tribute.³⁰ But the Han court had protocols for assessing foreign groups and the
passage in the Hou Hanshu suggests the diplomats were on a genuine mission from
the Emperor. An accurate reading of the ancient text indicates that the meager
gifts made certain Chinese officials doubt established reports describing the
wealth and significance of Rome. This exchange of gifts concluded the meeting,
and the Antonine envoys were escorted back to Rinan and their waiting
ship.
The Antonine
delegates probably expected to spend the summer of AD 168 in India with their
return to Roman Egypt scheduled for November of that year. Given these
schedules, the Chinese anticipated further contacts from the Romans in AD 170. But no one returned, not even
opportunistic merchants exploiting lucrative new opportunities. Chinese
officials sought explanations for the lack of contact by Rome and drew
attention to the condition of the gifts offered by the Antonine group. They
accepted that the diplomats were genuine, but concluded that Rome was not as
wealthy or as politically ambitious as their foreign informants had
claimed.
However, if the
Antonine delegates had returned safely to Egypt, they would have found the
Roman Empire amid an unprecedented crisis. In AD 165 the Roman legions
successfully invaded the Parthian Empire, captured the city of Seleucia, and occupied Babylonia. But an
unknown disease broke out amongst the troops during the winter months, and this
lethal sickness soon reached high levels of infection. The Roman army was
forced to abandon the war and retreat to Syria, with many men still infected by
the outbreak. Dio reports that the co-emperor Lucius Verus ‘lost a great many
of his soldiers through supply shortages and disease, but he made it back to
Syria with the survivors’.³¹
The returning troops
spread the disease into the main cities of the Roman Empire. The Historia
Augusta claims that ‘it was his fate that disease seemed to follow Verus
through whatever provinces he traveled on his return until finally, it reached
Rome.’³² This disease, known to academics as the ‘Antonine
Plague,’ quickly reached epidemic levels in many parts of the Empire. Major
outbreaks kept reoccurring in previously affected regions, causing further
distress and death to the Roman population. In AD 168, the imperial physician
Galen had to treat an epidemic amongst the Roman army in northeast Italy. He
reports, ‘When I reached Aquileia, the infection was at a greater intensity
than previous outbreaks. The Emperors immediately went back to Rome with a few
soldiers, while the majority had difficulty surviving and most perished.’³³ In
AD 169, the co-emperor Lucius Verus died suddenly due to an undisclosed illness
that might have been the disease, or a sickness caused by the toxic effects of
preventative medicines.³⁴
Galen documented the
symptoms and effects of the disease, which seems to have been a virulent new
form of smallpox. The infection caused many deaths since the Roman population
had no inherited resistance to this lethal strain. Possible death rates are suggested
by papyrus documents recovered from Roman Egypt. Tax records for Socnopaiou
Nesos confirm that between September AD 178 and
February 179, a village with 244 male inhabitants lost seventy-eight men due to
the disease. This is almost one-third of the male population in six months.³⁵ A
bronze plaque from Virunum, near the Noricum iron
mine, gives a membership list for a
local temple devoted to Mithras. In AD 183, the Mithraeum lost five of its
ninety-eight members during a fresh outbreak of the disease.³⁶ Modern strains
of the smallpox virus can leave survivors visually impaired or infertile, so many who recovered from the infection were
left with severe disabilities that made them dependent on others, or vulnerable
to further illness.
As the legions
succumbed to disease, the Roman defenses on the northern frontiers were overrun
by Germanic invaders. Marcus Aurelius spent the remainder of his reign
campaigning to restore the Roman Empire and safeguard its European frontiers.
Unknown to the Romans, the same disease was spreading through the Far East and
inflicting a similar death rate on the Chinese Empire. The Hou Hanshu records
that in AD 162 one third of the Han army stationed on the northern frontiers
died or were debilitated during the early stages of this pandemic.³⁷
International trade
declined, and long-distance communications were no longer feasible as both
empires suffered severe damage to their manpower. Hopes of an alliance between
distant empires were no longer achievable as the governments of China and Rome
fought for individual survival in a world were devastating disease reduced
settled populations and crippled entire armies.
Roman contact with
Southern China In AD 184 the Chinese Empire was destabilized by a major
political uprising known as the Yellow TurbanTaiping dao (or Way of Great Peace) rebellion
also translated as the Yellow Scarves Rebellion. The rebels mobilized Chinese
peasants and rural militia who wore yellow fabric around their heads to
identify their allegiance to a revolutionary Taoist sect that practiced
faith-healing. To restore order the Han regime gave greater political, military
and tax-collecting powers to provincial governors, local rulers, and Chinese
generals. These new warlords suppressed the yellow scarves' rebellion and then
fought to claim power for themselves (AD 196–208).
China was split into
three rival kingdoms with a warlord named Cao Cao
ruling the northern half of the country (the Kingdom of Wei). South of the Yangtze
River the lower provinces of China were divided between the Kingdom of Shu in
the west and the Kingdom of Wu in the east. The Han dynasty officially ended in
AD 220 when the weak and ineffective emperor Xian was
forced to abdicate by the son of Cao Cao.
During this era, the
Roman Empire also suffered a period of serious political and economic
instability as the population declined and imperial revenues diminished.
This crisis included
a civil war that threatened to split the Roman Empire into three rival domains
(AD 192–197). Clodius Albinus seized power in Gaul, Pescennius
Niger claimed Syria, while Septimius Severus gained Pannonia and Italy. When
Severus successfully defeated his rivals he founded a new imperial dynasty that
stabilised the Roman Empire for several decades (AD
198–235).
A Chinese text called
the Liang-shu 梁書 records how a Roman merchant named Lun reached
southern China in AD 226. Lun could be the Greek name Leon phonically
simplified by Chinese scholars.³⁸ Lun, or Leon, arrived aboard a Roman ship
that sailed from Thailand around Vietnam to reach the Chinese Kingdom of Wu. On
arrival, he was questioned by the Chinese Prefect of Tonkin (northern Vietnam)
and identified himself as a merchant specializing in long-distance trade. The
Prefect of Tonkin sent Leon to Wuchang (modern Ezhou) which was the inland
capital of the Wu Kingdom and the court of the regional Emperor Sun
Quan.³⁹
By AD 226 the Kingdom
of Wu had reached a political and military stalemate with the powerful Kingdom
of Wei in northern China. But Sun Quan wanted to expand his domains and was
interested in extending his rule south into Cambodia and Vietnam. He had maritime
interests in the East China Sea and was preparing an armada with 10,000 troops
to invade the nearby island of Taiwan (AD 230).⁴⁰
Sun Qian may have
been surprised to learn that the Roman Empire was still intact and functioning
as a unified state at a time when China had split into three rival kingdoms.
The Liang-shu reports that Sun Quan ‘asked Lun for
details about his native land and its customs, and Lun prepared a report in
reply.’ The prospect of establishing political and commercial contacts with
Rome must have been intriguing. The Liang-shu records
that Sun Quan selected a Chinese officer named Liu Hsien to accompany Leon on
his return journey to the Roman Empire.
While he was present
at the Wu court, Leon expressed interest in some tiny dark-skinned captives
that had been seized by Chinese forces in Southeast
Asia. Leon remarked
that these people were rare and valuable in Rome, so Sun Quan gave twenty of
the captives to him as a gift, possibly hoping to ensure the return of further
Roman merchants to the WuKingdom. Leon left China
around AD 227, but there is no record
that his ship ever made it safely back to the Roman Empire. The vessel may have
been wrecked by storms, attacked by pirates in the Gulf of Thailand, or perhaps
succumbed to the paralyzing calms in the Straits of Malacca. The Liang-shu recorded that ‘Lun returned directly to his native
land, but Liu Hsien must have died on
the way.’⁴¹ The contemporary Roman sources make no mention of this contact or
the arrival of any distant foreigners at the court of Severus Alexander (AD 222–235). Once again,
an opportunity to establish direct political and commercial contacts had been
lost.
1. The Geography of Strabo. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, Ltd. 1924, 17.1.45.
2. The Periplus of
Hanno a voyage of discovery down the west African coast. Translated by Schoff,
H. 1912, 64.
3. Epistulae (Pliny), the letters of Pliny the Younger, 6.26.
4. Ptolemy,
Geography, 1.14.
5. Ibid., 7.3; 7.5;
7.7; 8.1; Berggren and Jones, Ptolemy’s Geography (2000), 22.
6. Hou Hanshu, Book
of Later Han《後漢書》88.10.
7. Procopius of
Caesarea (Greek: Προκόπιος ὁ Καισαρεύς
Prokópios ho Kaisareús;
Latin: Procopius Caesariensis; c. 500 – c. after 565), Secret History, 25.
8. Ptolemy,
Geography, 1.
9. Ibid., 1.11.
10. Cary, "Maes,
Qui et Titianus" The Classical Quarterly, New Series, 6.3/4 (July–October
1956)(1956).
11. Velleius Paterculus,
2.94; Suetonius, Octavian, 21; Orosius, 6.21.
12. Strabo, 16.1.28.
13. Strabo, 11.33.1.
14. Ptolemy,
Geography, 1.11.
15. Hou Hanshu, 4.14
(November, AD 100).
16. Ptolemy,
Geography, 1.11.
17. Leslie and
Gardiner, The Roman Empire in Chinese Sources (1996), 148.
18. Hou Hanshu, 4.14;
88.1.
19. Ibid., 4.14.
20. Juvenal, DECIMVS
IVNIVS IVVENALIS 6.400–3.
21. Hou Hanshu,
88.12.
22. Equator: 24,901
miles.
23. Rose Sheldon,
Rome’s Wars in Parthia (2010), 155–7.
24. Tacitus, Annals,
14.25.
25. Hou Hanshu,
88.15.
26. Leslie and
Gardiner, The Roman Empire in Chinese Sources (1996), 137; 153.
27. Joseph Needham,
Science and Civilisation in China, Volume 4 (1971),
3–38.
28. Buddhist Parthian
prince An Shigao: biographies in Chu Sanzang Jiji and Gaoseng Zhuan.
29. Hou Hanshu,
88.12.
30. Friedrich Hirth, China and the Roman Orient (1885),
173–8.
31. Dio, 71.2.
32. Historia Augusta,
Lucius Verus, 8.1–4.
33. Claudii Galeni Opera
Omnia, 19.17–18.
34. Historia Augusta,
Lucius Verus, 11.
35. F. Preisigke, Sammelbuch
Griechischer Urkunden aus Aegypten (Scrapbook Greek documents from Egypt), 16.12816.
36. C.I.L. 3.5567.
37. Hou Hanshu,
65/55.2133 (4a–b).
38. Leslie and
Gardiner, The Roman Empire in Chinese Sources (1996), 100–1.
39. Yao Silian (姚思廉)
Book of Liang (Liáng Shū), , 48.
40. Li, China at War
(2012), 454–5.
41. Yao Silian, Liang-shu, 48.
For updates click homepage here