By Eric Vandenbroeck
22 May 2021
Unvarnished overview of the current UFO phenomena
As part of President Donald
Trump’s spending and pandemic relief package, the Senate Intelligence
Committee, led by Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Va.), included a provision calling for
the director of national intelligence to help produce an unclassified report on
everything government agencies know about UFOs, including scores of unusual
sightings reported by military pilots. Thus thanks to the Trump-era covid
relief bill, the UFO report is due sometime next month which no doubt will
create some more media frenzy, but it already started this week.
Based on an article
CNN posted
yesterday claiming a mysterious UFO
disappears into the water today, 22 May CNN newsroom continues to air
an ongoing UFO segment with pictured here the latest segment with Chris Cuomo:
As 'developing
tonight' in his latest presentation Chris Cuomo as seen above, reports
that it all started with a CBS’s Sunday Morning and 60
Minutes broadcast stories about UFOs, with Florida Senator Marco
Rubio sternly
intoning about the
importance of treating them as a potential national security concern.
This where CBS’s
David Pogue literally chuckled during his Sunday Morning UFO report, telling viewers we should “live and let live” and
not challenge UFO believers. Ezra
Klein in The New York Times and Gideon
Lewis-Kraus in The New Yorker said they would be sad without a UFO
mystery to enjoy, whereby Lewis-Kraus alleged there was good reason for
the U.S. government to get back into the business of hunting flying saucers.
The footage in
question is the same that is known from the Pentagon program that was
created at the behest of former Senator Harry Reid and was run jointly for a
time with Bigelow Aerospace in Las Vegas, whose owner, Robert Bigelow, has long
been on the hunt for extraterrestrials and poltergeists...
NASA Deputy
Administrator Lori Garver and President and founder of Bigelow Aerospace Robert
T. Bigelow in front of the Bigelow Expandable Activity Module:
For UFO believers,
the current promotion via CBS and CNN is the moment they had been waiting for.
UFOs were everywhere, and they were suddenly respectable. With a new
intelligence report on UFOs due to be delivered to Congress in June, even the
U.S. government seemed poised to take UFOs seriously again.
Behind the creamy
pages of high-end magazines and the marble columns of the Capitol, as we shall
see, the media elite and Congress are being played by a small, loosely
connected group of people with bizarre ideas about science. It’s easy to
dismiss UFOs as a fantasy or a fad, but the money, the connections, and the
power wielded by a group of UFO believers, and as appears now also embedded in
the defense industry, bent on supplanting material science with a
pseudoscientific mysticism.
On December 16,
2017, Politico, the New York Times, and The Washington Post published near-simultaneous stories
about an obscure $22 million Pentagon project that officially existed between
2008 and 2012.
All three outlets had
essentially the same story: The Pentagon program was created at the behest of
former Democratic Senator Harry Reid in 2008 and was run jointly for a time
with Bigelow Aerospace in Las Vegas, whose owner, Robert Bigelow, has long
been on the hunt for extraterrestrials and poltergeists.
Politico and the
Washington Post treated the Pentagon program as it appeared to be: A pet
project of a senator that didn’t amount to much, other than “reams of
paperwork”, and did not provide evidence that alien spaceships were buzzing our
skies. Both stories had well-placed sources in the intelligence community that
were skeptical of the program’s purpose and deliverables. Absent any salacious
details; neither story got a wider pickup.
The New York Times, however,
played up dubious tidbits that the Washington Post or Politico either didn’t
find credible or simply didn’t know about, namely that the program had found
“metal alloys and other materials… recovered from unidentified aerial
phenomena,” that got stored in a Bigelow Aerospace warehouse. There is no
indication in the Times story that any of these “materials” were seen firsthand
by its reporters.
The Times also had
something its competitors apparently didn’t: Grainy footage of two Navy F/A-18
fighter jets in 2004 tracking an apparent unknown object “traveling at high
speed and rotating” off the coast of San Diego. The 45-second video and the
Times front-page article went viral.
But there’s more to
the Times story that should’ve given readers pause.
One of the story's
authors was Leslie Kean, a journalist with a long-standing interest in UFOs and
the paranormal, who published a book in 2010 titled UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and
Government Officials Go on the Record. At the time, activists in the UFO
community were coalescing around the goal of obtaining official “disclosure”
about extraterrestrial sightings. This entailed finding current military and
aviation whistleblowers to come forward and share the secrets they knew about
UFOs, or in the case of Kean’s book, tell of the strange flying objects they
had seen or learned about in the course of their jobs. In numerous articles in the Huffington Post over the past
decade, Kean has discussed her participation in several nonprofit groups in
UFOs and the “disclosure” movement.
On Oct 10, 2017, Kean
published a tantalizing article on the Huffington Post’s contributor platform.
(The platform, now closed, allowed people to post their own writing to the
site). “Something extraordinary is about to be revealed,” she wrote. “Former
high-level officials and scientists with deep black experience who have always
remained in the shadows” were preparing to dish “inside knowledge” of UFOs.
Kean described a
group of “government insiders” who came together as part of a new for-profit
company called To the Stars Academy of Arts & Science (TTSA). Members
included Hal Puthoff, a theoretical physicist
and former Scientologist who directed the infamous “psychic spy” program for
the CIA and DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) in the 1970s and 1980s, and Chris
Mellon, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence during
the Clinton and George W. Bush Administrations.
Of note, the founding
of TTSA was set in motion by Tom DeLonge, a former guitarist for Blink-182
who has long nursed a very public obsession with UFOs. Another key
player was a former military intelligence officer named Luis Elizondo, who at the
launch of TTSA publicly announced that an “aerospace threat identification
program” he had recently overseen at the Pentagon had convinced him the UFO
“phenomena was indeed real.”
The Times, encouraged by Kean, took a serious look at Elizondo and his
claims. Other prominent outlets, it turned out, were doing so, too. Two months
later, the Times, Politico, and Washington Post stories hit. But it was the
Times piece that reverberated across the media landscape.
ABC News called the
Times story and video footage a “bombshell.” MSNBC, in one of its numerous segments on the
story, described news of the government’s UFO program as a
“remarkable admission by the Pentagon” as a “result of reporting by the New
York Times.” Every major television network rolled the video. “You can laugh if
you want,” news anchor Bret Baier said on Fox, “but a lot of people are taking this
revelation seriously.” Elizondo, who would become a media darling over the
months to come, said on CNN: “My personal belief is there is very
compelling evidence we may not be alone.”
Amidst the media
frenzy, few prominent outlets bothered to look closely at the juicy particulars
of the Times piece or at the UFO video that left many awestruck. Notable
exceptions included Scientific American, which was deeply skeptical about those metal chunks being stored
in a Bigelow warehouse, and New York magazine, which, in a damning critique by writer Jeff Wise, faulted the Times story
for “selective omissions” and for “making portentous assertions out of
context.” Wise wrote that such techniques “are great for exciting an audience,
but they’re better suited to Ancient Aliens,” the aforementioned History
Channel series, “than the pages of the New York Times.”
These criticisms
hardly registered, though. If anything, the juggernaut grew after Elizondo and
TTSA in 2018 rolled out more intriguing videos, obtained from the Pentagon, of
supposed UFOs under pursuit by military jets. It launched another news cycle,
once again with few skeptical voices in the media.
Meanwhile, TTSA
raised over $2 million from investors. The company’s all-stars, particularly
Elizondo, continue to generate media coverage. As the Washington Post noted last May in a news story: “UFOs are suddenly a
serious story.
As Neil deGrasse
Tyson put it rather well: What the UFO community puts forth as evidence is weak
on a level that, in any scientific circle, would be kicked out of the lab room.
The basis of this argument boils down to the foundations of the scientific
method. Eyewitness testimony is nowhere near enough evidence to support a claim
as fantastical as alien visitors. He added: I am not saying didn't see it - I'm simply saying you cannot
present that as evidence for something you want all of us to believe.
The alleged evidence Luis
Elizondo mentioned is a video shown here and can also be seen on
Tom DeLonge's website, along with his
commentary. The video is discussed here: Plus, over on Metabunk, Mick West
makes a good case that these images show distant jets. In fact, they
seem quite similar to the "Groundbreaking UFO video" that
Leslie Kean (one of the authors of the New York Times UFO article) obtained
from Chile's UFO investigations group early this year, quite conclusively shown to have been a distant jet aircraft
whose position had been misjudged.
Or as a recent
article stated: "The media" loves this UFO expert who says he worked for
an obscure pentagon program, did he?
Even today, People
who claim to see UFOs are typically adamant about what they witnessed, though
most space experts are unconvinced. “No serious astronomer gives any credence
to any of these stories,” astrophysicist Martin Rees notably said in 2012. He’s right. UFO reports can be
attributed to commercial or military jets, weather balloons, an odd cloud
formation, a comet, or Venus (under certain atmospheric conditions). The planet
can appear as a fast-moving, bright halo). Some intrepid photographers have even confused insects flying around a camera lens
for alien aircraft.
As we have thus
seen, Bigelow leveraged his friendship with Democratic Nevada Senator Harry Reid, who thought Bigelow to be “brilliant” and received
tens of thousands in campaign donations from him. Reid and two other senators
moved to expand the Skinwalker Ranch investigation into a fully-funded
government program, despite the Pentagon’s complete lack of interest in UFOs or
space spooks, mandating that the military research “aerial threats” at
the cost of $22 million over five years. Bigelow, the only bidder, received the
contract to research these “threats.”
The only public
accounting of the program’s research was a list of its theoretical papers on
stargates, wormholes, and other sci-fi topics that “invisible college” members
like Puthoff obsessed over, as well as a proprietary
494-page 2009 “ten-month
report” from Bigelow’s team
in which Puthoff, Vallée,
and others wrote about UFOs, “interdimensional phenomena” at Skinwalker Ranch.
Alleged technology aliens implanted in a UFO abductee. Pentagon officials
quickly concluded that releasing such an absurd report “would be a disaster,”
as one unnamed
official told The
New Yorker. Eventually, Team Space Ghost developed bizarre mythology,
imagining that an organized cabal in the Pentagon actively suppressed UFO work
because it feared UFOs were demons and that researching them might provoke
Satan.
The program’s funding
ran out in 2012. But its supporters have continued to labor tirelessly to push
its ideas into the mainstream. Ex-official Luis Elizondo says he continued the
program’s work through a different office before leaving the Pentagon for
reality TV. (The Pentagon denies Elizondo’s
account and insists he
had no “assigned responsibilities” for the program.) Despite claiming to
believe UFOs were an imminent national security threat, he didn’t take his
concerns to national security journalists or Congress. He joined up with Puthoff and Team Space Ghost at their new entertainment company, To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science, styled
TTSA.
How they succeeded in manipulating the media
They were not master
manipulators. But they succeeded in manipulating the media anyway. As seen
above, joining forces with fading rock
star Tom DeLonge of
Blink-182. DeLonge reached out to former Obama White House counselor John
Podesta in 2016 for help meeting with investigative journalist and paranormal
enthusiast Leslie Kean or “somebody else more elevated than her” to help
promote his UFO entertainment ventures.
In many ways, Kean
was the perfect vehicle for a UFO story. She knew everyone involved. In 2002,
Kean joined the Sci-Fi Channel and Podesta to sue the government to release UFO
information. A regular at UFO researcher gatherings, Kean had been the
last romantic partner of Budd Hopkins. They were together when she published a
credulous book on military UFO sightings in 2010 with a foreword by Podesta.
(Hopkins died in 2011.) She later joined UFO DATA, a UFO research organization,
where she met a scion of the Mellon family, Christopher K. Mellon, a former defense
official, and Senate
staffer. Mellon had been briefed on Project Stargate when in office and
professed love of UFOs. He became an investor in TTSA, staffed by Bigelow
veterans like Puthoff. When Elizondo brought his
story to TTSA, Mellon knew whom to call.
The TTSA team met
with Kean on October 4, 2017, and she gushed over
them in
the Huffington Post six days later. The Huffington Post was
exactly the kind of second-tier pop culture media like Rolling
Stone, Politico, and Joe Rogan’s podcast that TTSA courted at first,
lacking connections at more elite publications. That’s when dumb luck hit. As
seen above, Kean had an idea.
After the meeting,
Kean contacted retired New York Times reporter Ralph Blumenthal, whom
she knew because of their shared connections in the alien abduction world.
Blumenthal was working on a biography of John Mack, a colleague of Hopkins also
funded by Bigelow. Blumenthal called the Times and convinced the
paper to run the story, and it was a good
story, that a
billionaire had scored himself a personal military UFO research program. But
Blumenthal and Kean framed the story as one of military interest in
UFOs, not Bigelow’s, thus shaping media and congressional perceptions of the
program.
Kean and Blumenthal’s
first Times UFO story ran on December 17, 2017, on page one.
Blumenthal had given TTSA something the “invisible college” had tried and
failed to gain for years, elite respectability. Major media now ran countless
stories, citing the Times as an excuse, with little mention of space
ghosts or anything that might make the program seem unserious. This lent it
more credibility. TTSA used Mellon’s connections to meet with Senate staffers
primed by the Times coverage. Senators, including Mark Warner and
Marco Rubio, radicalized by media coverage and lobbying from Mellon’s
team, subsequently requested briefings from the Pentagon, allegedly to
understand what they were reading in the news. Mellon praised Rubio
for using last year’s Intelligence Authorization Act to require that the
military and intelligence agencies produce a report about UFOs. “It further
legitimizes the issue,” Mellon said. It could also create a rush for new defense
contracts.
By this spring, the
imminent report, and prodding from Mellon and Kean, prompted another round of
uncritical media coverage. Kean and Elizondo were profiled in the
aforementioned credulous New Yorker article tied to the
congressional report Mellon had lobbied for. Within days, Elizondo and Mellon,
who left TTSA for their own unnamed new national security UFO venture, were
everywhere in the media, from 60 Minutes to CNN, reinforcing the
Pentagon and UFO threat narrative skeptics did not recognize.
The threat narrative
was a brilliant bit of framing, turning a story of poltergeist hunters battling
a cabal of demon-believers into a national security issue. But this influence
campaign masks the deeper transformation its advocates want to bring about: Puthoff and his colleagues seek to delegitimize material
science in favor of a magical, neo-medieval view of reality founded on spirit,
or, in their terms, security issue. But this influence campaign masks the
deeper transformation its advocates want to bring about: Puthoff
and his colleagues seek to delegitimize material science in favor of a magical,
neo-medieval view of reality founded on spirit, or, in their terms, “consciousness” and psychic powers. Elizondo still speaks
of demon cabals,
otherworldly beings, and UFOs operating beyond human perception, just not
on 60 Minutes. UFOs, newly relevant as a security threat, are only the
vanguard of a larger effort to undo the failure of Stargate and elevate spirit
over matter. It’s bad science and dangerous as government policy, the kind of
magical thinking that leads to lunacy and disaster.
CBS’s David Pogue
literally chuckled during his Sunday Morning UFO report, telling viewers we should “live and let live” and
not challenge UFO believers. Klein and Lewis-Kraus said they would be sad
without a UFO mystery to enjoy. HBO Max announced a valorizing biopic about
Kean,
Elizondo, and Mellon.
So long as a compliant media plays along with the “fun” of UFOs, the clumsy
effort to use them to break down modern science continues unabated. And Bigelow
is prepared: Blumenthal recently gave him a lavish New
York Times profile to
launch his new think tank for “consciousness science” and afterlife studies.
Bigelow appointed Hal Puthoff, members of the
“invisible college,” and Leslie Kean.
From esotericism to alleged Science
So far the story is
clear when we follow the footsteps of Ufology we see how it has evolved from
esoteric and borderline religious ideas all the way into the hallways of
Washington DC.
Looking at the
history of these ideas, we have a good idea of what will happen, and we
shouldn’t let enthusiasts of space ghosts have the run of Washington to steer
money and policy in the direction they want. If they insist UFOs are a national
security threat, then the national media must take them at their word. No more
chuckles. No more rhapsodies about mystery. We must hold Team Space Poltergeist
to the levels of skepticism, seriousness, and scrutiny it pretends to
demand.
Conclusion
The May 17e reporting
on CNN (from which the above snapshot was taken) and the 60
Minutes segment of Sunday, May 16, 2021 (available on YouTube), was no doubt for many people a startling revelation
that the US Government has admitted that UFOs are “real” and the military is
investigating them. But for many, it was a walk down memory lane, a recap of
the curious events as listed above.
The segment opens
with an interview with Luis Elizondo, the former head of the above
mentioned $22 million program instigated by Senator Harry Reid called
AATIP: the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. Ostensibly this
was created to study possible future developments in aerospace. Elizondo claims
the program was actually created to study UFOs (or, as they prefer to call them
now, UAPs, or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.) Put out to tender in 2008, the
budget was awarded to (pictured below) Robert Bigelow, a paranormal enthusiast.
Elizondo opens with
the startling claim that “the Government has already stated for the record that
[UFOs] are real.” Startling, that is, until you remember that “UFO” does not
necessarily mean alien visitors, but rather something unidentified in the sky,
something about which the observer lacks sufficient information to identify.
Obviously, the government would admit such things are “real.” A mylar balloon
floating into the range of a Navy jet’s camera is “real”, but the U in UFO and
UAP does not mean extraterrestrial, or even necessarily an aerial technology
beyond any known physics and aerodynamics.
Elizondo then goes on
to describe craft exhibiting startling technologies, the ability to accelerate
at a physics-defying 600g, reaching speeds of 17,000 mph in the atmosphere, or
even through water. These are things that the government very much
has not admitted are real.
We then are shown a
series of familiar videos as evidence of this amazing technology, all of which
have been in the public domain for some time (over a decade in one case) and
all of which have been analyzed by several people, and found to almost
certainly not represent objects exhibiting incredible abilities, and instead
more likely signify very ordinary human technology.
First, we see “Go
Fast”, a video presented as showing an incredibly fast craft skimming low over
the ocean. But if you do the very simple trigonometry invited by the numbers on
screen, it turns out to be something far above the surface and
moving at a speed that matches the wind at that altitude, making it almost
certainly just a balloon. Yet the 60 Minutes host, the highly
respected journalist Bill Whitaker, repeats Elizondo’s baseless claim that it’s
“fast moving.”
Next we see a more
recent video, the green flashing triangle. Initially very impressive, it shows
a triangular shaped object moving across the sky, filmed with a night vision
device from a Navy ship. But then you notice the flashing light that perfectly
matches the pattern of blinking lights on a commercial plane like a Boeing 737.
A little research reveals that some night-vision devices have a triangular
aperture (the analysis at Metabunk). When the device is slightly out of focus then a plane
flying overhead looks exactly like this flying triangle. The case was
effectively closed when other triangles in the scene were identified as stars.
Yet we are told “the Pentagon admits it doesn’t know what in the world it is.”
It’s pretty obvious what it is once you match the UAP blinking triangle to that
of commercial airliners.
In fact, the only
thing the Pentagon has admitted is that the videos are “real,” in that they
were taken by US Navy personnel (and not, therefore, fake CGI-generated videos
or whatever), and that they were included in studies by the UAP task force,
meaning they were at least unidentified at one point.
We are then shown two
other videos. “FLIR1” is claimed to show physics-defying acceleration, but
careful study has shown that the supposed sudden moves are actually the result
of the camera moving or changing mode. “GIMBAL” shows an impressive looking
flying saucer, but again the reality seems more mundane, an infrared glare of a
distant plane and a rotating gimbal mechanism explain both the rotating saucer
shape, and why it was named “gimbal” in the first place.
Later we hear about
the 2004 USS Nimitz aircraft carrier incident, which gave us the
FLIR1 video. Two pilots, David Fravor and Alex
Dietrich, repeat a story they (mostly Fravor) have
been telling for over a decade. Lauded as the greatest UFO encounter of all
time, it has remarkably little in terms of actual evidence. The one blurry
video has been consistently misinterpreted (including by Fravor)
as showing rapid motion. There are accounts of unusual radar returns showing
rapid motion, but unfortunately there’s no solid evidence for these, and the
account has changed somewhat since it first appeared in a bizarre short
science-fiction story written by the chief radar operator in 2008.
Dietrich and Fravor describe an encounter and short dog-fight with a
“Tic-Tac” shaped craft. This is perhaps the most compelling story, and one
that’s difficult to explain. But their accounts don’t exactly line up, and I
suspect that they saw the same thing, but both had different illusions of
motion based on parallax. Unfortunately, the passage of time might mean we will
never know what they saw.
We then meet
Elizondo’s partner in this enterprise, Christopher Mellon, former Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. Mellon seemingly shares
Elizondo’s suspicion that we are being visited by some kind of non-human
entity, and in 2017 worked with him to secure the release of the videos, which
they then gave to the New York Times for a piece of well-timed
publicity for their then employer, the To The Stars Academy, founded by rock
star Tom DeLonge.
The 60
Minutes segment is capped by Senator Marco Rubio, who has somehow become
embroiled in the UAP saga, presenting himself as the voice of reason, just
trying to get the military to look into “this.”
But the military is
not ignoring things that fly into their airspace just because they can’t
identify them. Procedures exist for reporting and investigating such things,
not the least of which being that incursion into sensitive airspace would be
aggressively intercepted. And the supposed rationale for AATIP (exploiting UFO
technology) has already been covered by a variety of Foreign Material
Exploitation Program, likely with vastly higher budgets.
Ultimately this story
has gone on for far too long because the wall of military secrecy allows
rampant speculation and claims based on supposed classified knowledge. The
unwillingness of the military to clear this up is perhaps understandable, as
they have more important things to do. But it’s becoming a big story now, with
large segments of the public thinking that there’s something to these accounts
and these videos, and it’s a short path from “unidentified” to
“extraterrestrial” or “foreign assets”. I do not have great expectations for
the story going away, but I wish that someone high up will eventually say
enough is enough, and explain exactly what is going on, what these videos show,
and what the military really thinks about UFOs.
For updates click homepage here