As was seen in P.1, could
illusions performed by godmen which involve a violent aspect increase the level
of influence passed on to the viewer. For example described as the tong of
Kali, godmen in India will make their tongue supple by pulling it daily for
about fifteen minutes and then curling it back into the throat. After practising this position the godmen places the tongue of an
animal in the mouth, and as if it is cut remove it and curl the real tongue
inside into the mouth. Then as if refixing the tongue, palm the animal tongue
and bring back the original tongue to its usual position.
But while spectators may feel empathetic
towards the individual experiencing pain, maybe it is not anly
that, sentiment which spectators drawn to. In fact could it also be aggression
as a sign of power?
So for example the Basket Trick still
popular in India today. Here the godmen presents an oval-shaped basket, one in
which the bottom is much wider than the top. These appear to be common in
India. The basket is displayed to the audience. validating that it is truly
empty. The performer then presents a boy, who is usually dressed in loud
attire. The boy steps into the basket, maneuvering until his body is fitted
completely inside. Once this has taken place, the lid is closed and a sheet is
thrown over the basket. After a moment, the cloth is removed, and the fakir
begins to run a sword through the basket several times, until no doubt is left
that the boy must have been killed. At this point the cloth is placed back onto
the basket and the fakir places his hands underneath the sheet to remove the
lid. Feeling inside, he removes the articles of the boy's clothing from the
basket (typically a turban and ajacket). To the
astonishment of the crowd, the boy is gone, and to validate this, the godman
jumps into the basket to prove that the boy has not in any way contorted
himself to fit inside. Appearing distraught, the performer places the turban
and jacket back inside of the basket, and proceeds to remove the cloth. In a
sudden surge of excitement, the godme-magicians grabs
towards the air with the sheet and immediately replaces it onto the basket.
After a moment, there appears to be commotion from under the cloth and, soon
after, the boy emerges unhanned, wearing his turban
and jacket.
Unlike the Mango Tree Trick, this feat
of illusion returns to the violent theatricality often seen in the performance
of Indian mystics. However, these two tricks are certainly linked in their
lengthy preparations. The truth of the matter is that at no point does the boy
actually leave the basket. When the lid is closed, the first step is for the
young assistant to remove his turban and jacket. The remainder of the trick
relies on the flexibility of the boy. After removing the two articles of
clothing, the assistant lays in a circular shape, essentially outlining the
bottom of the basket. However, the godmen-magician runs his sword through in
countless angles, making it impossible for the boy to remain unharmed. This is
where the preparation comes into practice. The sword thrusts are choreographed before hand, so that each time the sword moves through, the
assistant re-positions himself so as not to be in the target of the blade when
it pierces through. After this portion of the illusion, the boy re-configures
his body into its original circular motion, outlining the bottom of the basket.
This allows room at the center for the godmen-magicians to jump inside, proving
to the audience that the assistant has vanished.
When the godman places the turban and
jacket back inside of the basket, the boy simply puts them back on, emerges
from the top, and astounds the audience. Following what seems to be humanity's
natural fascination with violence, the answer appears to be quite obvious that
the volatility gives the illusion a greater sense of anticipation and
sensationalism. Granted, the feat is rather dangerous regardless of its
illusory factors, let alone what the spectators believe they are witnessing. To
mediate divine powers to perform such an action win have great effect, but to
be able to do so in the face of mortality will have a much greater influential
stamp on those who witness the action.
It makes sense then that these mediators
to the spiritual world would be able to harness this same power. Though the
illusion involving the mango tree does not implement any violent tactics, there
still exists this similar variable. The conjurer serves as the mediator in
giving the tree life. In the Hindu Basket Trick:, the conjurer takes life away
with his sword, only to return life to the assistant at the end of the
illusion. On one hand, there exists this powerfully violent factor and, on the
other, the ability to master what may be the most mysterious realm of human
quandary, the source of life.
In another feath
the godmen begin by placing a small bowl on the ground after previously showing
the audience that it was first empty. The second step involves just filling the
bowl with water. In terms of how much water is distributed, the amount will
either be shallow, or the water will overflow. At this point, the fakir will
place a small toy duck into the bowl, step aside, and begin to play his flute.
In plain site of the spectators, the duck will begin
to move, and will suddenly dive into the water in the natural manner as if it
was truly alive. One by one, audience members will approach the bowl with their
hand outstretched. Each time a spectator's hand becomes too close, the duck
will submerge into the water, until the hand recedes at which point the duck
will again surface. After this procedure has taken place, the toy is examined
and validated as not having been altered in any way. The key to understanding
the illusion however is not in the toy duck, but in the bowl. Before the
performance takes place, thegoman-magician will make
an extremely tiny incision into the bowl. He then runs a thin piece of brown
thread through the hole, this being invisible to the naked eye via the
camouflage of the ground. At the end of the thread, the conjurer has placed a
thin coat of wax, which will be used to grab onto and maneuver the duck.
Audience members do not suspect the godman who is standing at a greater
distance to the bowl in comparison to themselves. As he plays the flute, he is
in actuality pulling the thread which controls the toy. In cases where there
are at least two perfonners, the assistant will be
the one who pulls the thread. The connection of the wax takes place when the
conjurer places the toy duck in the water.
One obvious question which arises from
this illusion becomes, how does the godmen hide the certain leak which arises
from the incision made into the bowl? This depends on whether or not the bowl
is filled to a shallow level or overflowing with water. If the level is
shallow, the godmen will preface the illusion by sprinkling water below where
he will set the bowl. Again he will mutter some type of incantation to mask
this as some type of ritual when truly it hides the water which will soon leak
out. If the water overflows, then it will be this factor which will mask the
leaking water.
Indian mystics also use a very similar
illusion called the Jumping Rabbit. The bowl is still implemented; however,
there is no incision made before hand. After the
water is poured, sand is added, which at this time the godman will place a
small spring. The spring itself is bent into a circle, and held together by a
sugar cube. The now sandy water masks not only the insertion of the spring into
the bowl, but also its key role in the illusion. A toy rabbit is placed on top
of the water, strategically atop where the spring is hinged. At this point, the
audience will gather closely around the bowl while the fakir will distance
himself, and begin to play drums while again simultaneously muttering
incantations. The next portion of the illusion is a waiting game. After a short
period of time, the sugar cube will melt, causing the spring to un-hinge. This
reaction will cause the toy rabbit to come jumping out of the bowl, both
terrifying and mesmerizing the crowd. The godman must quickly approach the bowl
and palm the spring before dumping the water. Typically, this illusion will be
performed immediately after the Diving Duck to thwart off cynics. Though the
feats are performed in completely separate ways, the connection of the bowl and
the small toy animal creates an arbitrary connection in the minds of the
audience.
Similar to the Hindu Basket Trick,
the godman-magician appears to give life and take life away through both the
Diving Duck and the Jumping Rabbit. The Hindu Basket Trick is likely more
effective because it appeared to control a human life as opposed to the control
of a supposed animal's life. In these three instances, the connection to this
ability is quite apparent. In other illusions this ability to control life may
not seem to be on the surface, but it is still certainly relevant.
In another trick in India, a small pail
is presented, and filled completely with water. The mystic then lifts his arm
to reveal a handful of sand. A portion of this is blown in several directions
conveying that it is in fact true sand. The remainder is placed inside the grip
of the godman-magician, as he submerges his hand in the bucket completely,
releasing the sand into the water. It is important for the fakir to show his
hands to the audience at this point. He washes them thoroughly and presents
them to the crowd. It is here that the illusion is presented. The mystic
reaches back into the pail of water and removes the sand,which
has retained its dry and powdery consistency.
The pail and water has nothing to do
with the illusory factors of the performance however. The feat is able to be
performed due to the preparation of the sand, which takes several days. To
begin with the godman obtains an ample quantity of clean, dry sand which he
then rinses in hot water several times in order to eliminate any remaining dirt
particles. After this process, the sand is sun-dried for several days. Two
quarts of the resulting substance is then cooked in a frying pan accompanied
with a small piece of paraffin (a waxy substance obtained from tar or
petroleum). The cooking of the sand is complete once the paraffin appears to
have disappeared. Once this has taken place, the paraffin is actually coating
the sand, though this is not visible to the naked eye. This coating is what
makes the sand unreceptive to the effects of the water. When the mystic first
places the sand in the pail, he squeezes it into a ball, causing it to adhere;
this essentially creates an outer shell.
When first reviewing the illusion, the
aspect of giving and/or taking away life was not coming across. However water
is a symbol and a source of life cross-cu1tura1ly--and across species for that
matter-- and to control this substance is to symbollicly,
control life. By rejecting the influence of the water onto the sand, the mystic
is thus symbolically stating that he is not susceptible or dependent on the effects
of having or not having water. To control the symbol of life is to control life
itself. Similar illusory control of water is seen in the Brass Bowl Trick, in
which a fakir will place cold water into a brass bowl along with an ice cube to
prove it is actually cold water. A cloth is placed over the bowl and the mystic
steps to the side and begins with the conjurer's signature indecipherable
incantation alongside the beating of a drum. A few moments pass, and the water
has turned to an extremely hot temperature. To perform this, the use of a
special bowl is needed. The bowl is double sided and the space between the two
side layers is filled with the hot water. Before the fakir places the cloth
over the bowl, he scratches off a rather small piece of wax covering a hole on
the side of the bowl, and another small piece of wax on the bottom. As the hot
water filters in from the space between the side layers, the cold water filters
out to the space between the bottom layers. The false incantation represents to
the audience member the dialogue between the fakir and the deities, the deities
granting the performer the ability to control water, which in turn, is
controlling life.
in another illusion seen in India, the
mystic will present a small box to the audience participant. To begin with, the
conjurer will open the box to reveal three beans placed inside. He then tips
the box over, releasing the beans into the hand of the participant. The mystic
will instruct the audience member to close their hand, wait a few moments, and
then open it again, followed by the conjurer asking if the beans have remained
in the palm (of course they are still in the same location). In this next phase
of the illusion, the audience member is instructed to place the contents in his
hand back into the box. The fakir will speak some type of prayer, and re-open
the box over the spectator's hand. To the shock of this volunteer, and the
crowd, a scorpion falls from the box and into the hand which once held the
beans.
This particular performance is not
achieved with any tampered beans. Instead, it is the box which has been
constructed in a peculiar way. From plain sight, it appears to have only one
compartment, when in reality there are two compartments inside the box. The
first compartment, which held the beans, is rather small and located towards
the top. This area is small enough. that when the second compartment, which
contains the scorpion, is opened, it appears to be one in the same.
The scorpion illusion seems to be
closely related to the feats involving the duck and the rabbit. All three
involve bringing to life an animal from an inanimate object. While this is
true, there also appears to exist a greater sense of sensationalism and
volatility with this particular illusion, similar to that found in the Hindu
Basket Trick. This fi1ctor is relevant due to the incorporation of the scorpion
as the object brought to life. Scorpions are quite prevalent in India; however,
certain species are no danger to humans. Most audience members, and audience
volunteers especially. will not be able to make this differentiation between
the time the scorpion is released from the box to the time it lands in the palm
of the now hesitant participant. The implementation of this dangerous aspect
makes the illusion that much more compelling. It is not as directly violent as
stabbing through a basket containing a small child, but it certainly gets the
point across. So in a sense, the scorpion is almost as crucial to the illusion
as the mischievously conceived second compartment of the box.
The scorpion comes into the equation
again in the Basket and Chickens Trick, in which a basket is placed over a
stone. The basket is lifted, and the stone has turned into a scorpion. While
the spectators marvel at the scorpion, the fakir releases a small bag of
approximately fifteen birds underneath the basket. He then distracts the crowd
with an artificial summoning of spirits, and, from their perspective, birds
have appeared from thin air once the basket is lifted again. The effect in this
illusion will be linear to the one felt in the Beans and Scorpion Trick, with
the creation of life from an inanimate object, and the element of danger felt
by the scorpion. Also, this sense of danger serves as a reminder of one's
morality, which in turn addresses the sense of our being, and thus religion
comes into the spectators awareness. This pushes the agenda of the mystics,
showcasing their personal relationship with the Hindu deities.
At one point a godman rolled out one to
two yards of thread and places it on the end of his tongue. He then chewed the
thread thoroughly and swallows it. At this point, an assistant handed the
performer a knife which he immediately uses to stab himself in the stomach.
Reaching under his shirt, the mystic began to pull out the swallowed thread
until lifting the garment to reveal that the thread has come out from his
stomach and appears to be protruding from his skin. The mystic then pushes out
the last bit to show the audience the end of the thread which now has blood on
it.
What can first be concluded is that the
thread taken in the mouth is not the same thread which is pulled out from the
stomach. Moreover, the thread which the godman places in his mouth is never
actually swallowed, and is instead hidden below the back teeth. The thread
pulled from the stomach is first hidden underneath the shirt, the godman merely
pulling it from the linen until lifting the garment to reveal his stomach. The
self-inflicted stab wound is an illusion as well.
It is presumed to be the work of proper
angles and baggy clothing. Though the climactic stab wound is a farce, the
fakir will make a small incision into his stomach prior to the performance. As
he pulls the thread from under his shirt, he is simultaneously working the tail
end into the incision so that when he reveals his stomach, it will appear that
this is the source of the thread. The illusion does not linger far from reality
in this sense, when one considers that the blood at the end of the thread is in
fact just that, and that the string, though not the primary ingredient, is
truly emerging from the stomach.
Within Western society, snake charming
appears to be one of the most famous street performances stemming from India.
Even small children have seen visuals of this interaction between the flutist
and the cobra. The perception of the feat is that the snake is somehow
hypnotized by the music, as it sways back and forth; its head emerges from the
basket placed in front of the godmen, suggesting the performer is somehow in control
of this deadly creature. However, there are many ways to perform this illusion,
some much more humane than others. In a few instances, the godmen today, will
simply sit out of striking distance of the cobra. In order to cause the snake
to emerge in the fashion it does, the basket it is placed in must be covered by
a sheet, making it quite dark for the snake. When the sheet is removed, the
cobra emerges out of the hole as a reaction to the change in environment; the
opening of its hood is simply a defense mechanism. The swaying of the cobra is
a mirrored reaction to the movement of the flute as the mystic moves the
instrument back and forth. Most snake charmers take greater precautions to
avoid being bitten. In most cases, the charmer will remove either the venom
glands, or the entire fangs from the mouth of the snake, rendering the animal
harmless.
The connection to controlling life in
this illusion is linear to that of the feats involving scorpions. Granted, the
magician-alleged godman, is not bringing anything to life in this performance,
but he is controlling a dangerous animal, one that can be potentially lethal.
This performance is so popular that the
practice has filtered far outside the realms of Indian mysticism and is now
performed by snake charmers who ask for monetary compensation, lacking any
spiritual motivations. The use of snakes in the illusions of godmen is not
limited to this performance, and finds its way back into the repertoire of
these conjurers.
There also exists a feat in India today,
in which a the godmen will take an ordinary walking stick, and ''transform'' it
into a snake. Apparently there exists some nerve on the back of the neck that
will, when pressure is applied, cause the snake to become extremely stiff in
some type of temporary paralysis. This creates as was in the case of Moses in
the Bible, the illusion of the snake as a stick. Then after a short period of
time, the snake recovers, and returns to its normal state. The use of this
trick in India one could say, conveys symbols of a dangerous animal,
associating morality, along with the creation of life.
This brings us to the Indian Rope
Trick which has been analysed by parapsycholgist
Peter Lamont
in 2004 (Lamont works at the
Koestler Parapsychology Unit).
In fact it is still a question whether
the act originated in China or India, as eyewitness accounts began circulating
from both areas in and around the thirteenth Century. But the practice
definitely gained more momentum out of India, though, now evident by the name
of the illusion. An interesting aspect of this feat is that it has only recently
been viewed as an illusion, and before was one of those strange enigmas which
no one knew how to decipher, outside of the godmen who actually completed the
task.
It appears that two people are needed
for the illusion to be completed, the alleged mystic, and a young male
assistant. From the spectators' vantage point a rope dangles from the air with
no source; it appears as though it is floating. When the spectators arrive, the
rope is either already dangling in the air or the fakir throws the rope straight
up as the audience watches as it completely defies Newton's laws of universal
gravitation. The mystic's assistant climbs the rope until he is completely out
of sight. After a few moments, he summons the assistant to return back to the
ground. As time elapses, the boy is nowhere to be seen, and the conjurer gives
several visual indicators that he is angry with his assistant's lack of
punctuality. This anger manifests itself until finally the fakir will place a
dagger in his teeth and ascend the rope to retrieve the boy. After he is out of
view, arguing is heard between the two, followed by loud and disturbing
screams. Moments later, dismembered body parts begin falling from the sky and
splattering onto the ground. It has become clear to the audience at this point
that he has killed the young assistant. The macician
then climbs down the rope and out of sight of the crowd, returning with a large
basket. He gathers all of the body parts and places them inside. Following the
standard practices of mystic street magic, the godman falls into a trance-like
state before lifting the lid off of the basket, at which time the boy springs
out alive and unharmed.
From some angles, this performance seems
to deviate from the realm of natural possibilities. While the gruesome portions
of the act are mysterious in their own right, the lingering of the rope in the
air is what baffles spectators the most.
There have been several explanations as to
how the Indian Rope Trick is accomplished; to begin with however, the trick
must be performed between two buildings, two hills, anywhere with this type of
setting. The reason for this is to secure a thin wire which connects to each
support. The type of wire used is unclear, but it must be able to support the
mystical magician, and the young assistant. From the spectator's perspective,
there are only two people performing the illusion, when in fact there are at
least three. The other assistant is never shown to the audience. If the
illusion begins with the rope already suspended in the air, then the act is
simpler to conduct, since the rope is already secured onto the wire. If the
illusion begins with the fakir throwing the rope into the air, it is the obligation
of the hidden assistant to catch the rope and secure it to the wire. The Indian
Rope Trick is also only to be performed at night. Candles are set up around the
rope, making it difficult to see into the air, this crucial element disguising
the happenings above. This also gives the effect of the rope appearing as if it
floats infinitely into the sky.
When the boy climbs up the rope, he will
either secure himself at the top in conjunction with the wire, or he will
traverse across the wire onto one of the two buildings, or hills, whichever was
used. When the faldr climbs up the rope, he will
position himself at the top with the wire. It is at this point that the unknown
assistant will throw down one of a couple of objects. In variations in which it
is to appear that limbs of the boy are sprinkling one by one onto the ground,
shaved monkey appendages are used by the assistant as the substitution. If the
illusion implements a less precise method, the hidden assistant will hurl pig
remnants to the ground, which are not necessarily supposed to be discernable as
particular body parts. In the Chinese version, the assistant will often
accompany the pig parts with several buckets of blood splashing on and around
the crowd.
Once the boy assistant is believed to be
dead, he will either climb down to the ground from one of the two sides, or in
some cases hide in the extremely baggy clothing of the fakir. If the conjurer
implements the second method, he will refrain from turning his back to the
crowd before retrieving the basket. Once the fakir goes for the basket, the boy
will have either already climbed inside, or will do so when the crowd can ot see what is happening. The remainder of the illusion is
not difficult as the boy merely waits for his cue to emerge from the basket.
With many of these illusions, the
explanation ruins the mystique of the performance. The level of skill and
timing involved in case of the Rope Trick however has to be incredible, thus
many fail at it miserably. Lamont (2004) credited the fakirs' ability in
climbing and balance to the juggling acts often performed by these
practitioners. One fakir would hold a bamboo pole reaching as high as sixty
feet. The other would ascend to the top, balancing on the end of the pole as
the mistcal magician on the ground maneuveres it to and fro without
dropping the large piece of bamboo. The Indian Rope Trick thus has been a cause
of great wonder in India, and amongst those interested in the Western sense of
magic. Such fascination has also brought about hypotheses which deviate from
the empirical explanations of the various other illusions.
However the themes, incorporated by this
type of magic, are consistent across the plethora of practiced illusions.
Like many of the other performances, it appears again that the confrontation
with violence and mortality cannot help but bring forth a sense of religious
speculation on the part of the audience members. This is driven home
particularly well with the death and rebirth of the young boy by the hands of
the mystical-magician. Though the illusion may not convert the witnesses, it at
least brings forth a spiritual context, especially since it was performed in
the name of the practitioners' religious persuasion.
Put in a differnt
way, the audience witnessing such an unnatural feat seems to gain some type of
bond through this shared experience; therefore one could argue, that the
illusion possesses a secondary cultural function of creating a sense of social
solidarity.
Though it is not known what percentage
of the audience members are converted, while audience members view these magic
tricks as feats of supernatural ability, they also seem to strike a sense of
curiosity in for example the lifestyle of Sai Baba.
For updates
click homepage here