The text
at the top reads: "Jews-Freemasonry" followed by; "World
politics World revolution." The text at the bottom reads,
"Freemasonry is an international organization beholden to Jewry with the
political goal of establishing Jewish domination through worldwide
revolution." The map, decorated with Masonic symbols (temple, square, and
apron), shows where revolutions took place in Europe from the French Revolution
in 1789 through the German Revolution in 1919. (Printed by WWII NaziGovernement)
The Nazi’s justified
every escalation of persecution against the Jews (who with the ‘Aryanisation’ of their money and property, where asked to
‘pay up’, for their ‘stab in the back’) as a response to what they alleged was
a prior act of aggression by international Jewry. And early on already Nazi
propaganda hinted at its intention to "exterminate" the Jews as
part of one overarching war of retaliation and defense. Written in 1924 (the
year of the following, poster on the left) Hitler as if preparing for the next
war already, in Mein Kampf:
"If at the
beginning of the war and during the war twelve or fifteen thousand of these
Hebrew corrupters of the people had been held under poison gas - the sacrifice
of millions would not have been in vain." 1
Faced with
expressions of such views by Nazi Germany's national political leaders, most
contemporary Marxists, liberals, and conservatives of the time, as well as a
good number of postwar scholars, were skeptical that the Nazis truly believed
their own propaganda. And yet an examination of modern political culture draws
attention to the causal significance of many irrational and illusory
ideological perspectives. In the case of Nazi Germany, historians have amply
documented what Saul Friedlander has called Hitler's early "redemptive
anti-Semitism," which combined paranoid fantasy about an all-powerful
international Jewry with promises of redeeming and saving Germany from that
pernicious influence. The Nazi party however attracted so many votes exactly
because they denounced the Jews as the cause of Germany's problems, from military
defeat to the Depression, and especially as an international conspiracy that
‘pulled the string’, or as Hitler called it in his 1945 testament (an elusive),
“community of the spirit.” 2
In this sense the
underlying narrative (rhetoric) of the Nazi’s remained the same, see for
example on the left a poster dated 1924 asking Germans to vote for the Nazi
party titled "The Wire Puller.” 3
On the right a poster
this time of the Nazi Government in 1943, titled "He Bears the Guilt for
the War." 4
While proclaiming
Jewry's threat to Nazi Germany (just like the German Kaiser had previously done
by inciting the Russian Revolution in 1917) Hitler prepared to launch a war for
Lebensraum, the Kaiser’s previous concept for a
'larger Mitteleuropa'. Such a
military action would not only provide Germany with raw materials and food
supplies safe from a potential Anglo-W.European,
blockade, it would allow for the German armies to reach British India (and like
Wilhelm II had previously announced take away their colony) plus lay the
groundwork for a subsequent bid for world domination and an attack on the
United States.5
With the explosion of
scholarship about the Holocaust, two scholarly communities emerged. One,
composed of military historians, continued to focus on the conventional
battlefield narratives of World War II, while the second examined the history
of the Holocaust by examining Auschwitz-Birkenau and other extermination camps,
instead of a more inclusive understanding of "the war against the
Jews."
For when the Nazi
leaders, in private conversations, office memos, or public statements, drew a
connection between the Jews and World War II, they were referring to World War
II and the Holocaust taken together as one apocalyptic battle. They did not limit
the meaning of their war against what they called international Jewry to the
Final Solution. Instead, they viewed the Final Solution, the details of which
they never discussed in public, as a necessary campaign of retaliation in the
context of a broader war of defense waged by Nazi Germany against international
Jewry. These prejudices and phobias had been commonplaces of European
anti-Semitism long before the Third Reich, but particularly in the case of
Germany as we have seen, by the end of WWI.
As Hannah Arendt
noted in her classic work The Origins of Totalitarianisrn,
"in order not to overestimate the importance of the propaganda lies one
should recall the much more numerous instances in which Hitler was completely
sincere and brutally unequivocal in the definition of the movement's true aims,
but they were Simply not acknowledged by a public unprepared for such
consistency." 6
Two key verbs and
nouns in the German language were at the core of the language of mass murder in
Nazi Germany: vernichten and ausrotten.
These translate as "annihilate," "exterminate,"
"totally destroy," and "kill," and the nouns Vernichtung and Ausrottung as
"annihilation," "extermination," "total
destruction," and "killing." Whether taken on their own from the
dictionary meaning or placed in the context of the speeches, paragraphs, and
sentences in which they were uttered, their meaning was clear. To the ears of
military men, the term Vernichtungschlacht,
"battle of annihilation," had a familiar, Clausewitzian
ring and denoted complete defeat of the enemy armies. In describing the Jewish
people as a whole as Nazi Germany's enemy, the Nazi narrative was an attempt to
situate the threats to annihilate and exterminate within the normal or at least
known language of warfare.7
Especially from 1941
on, the Nazi regime strove to assimilate genocidal language into a seemingly
ordinary or more conventional narrative of war. But when Hitler and other Nazi
leaders and propagandists uttered them to describe what they intended to do to
the Jews, they almost always did so after claiming that it was the Jews who
were intending to exterminate or annihilate not only the Nazi regime, the Nazi
party, and the German armies but the German people as a whole when the Nazis
projected a policy of Vernichtung or Ausrottung onto international Jewry, the clear meaning in
that context was that the Jews were supporting a genocidal policy aimed at
Germany. By summer of 1941, Hitler and Goebbels were saying publicly that the
threatened extermination of the Jews was now a part of ongoing official policy.
Also during 1941, the
Nazi leaders understood that American aid to Britain was crucial for keeping
Britain in the war, as a result, they intensified their propaganda attacks
claiming the USA was controlled by Jews. In American society and politics in
the 1930s and during World War II in reality, Jews were a marginal ethnic group
with modest political influence, living in a society still riven by powerful
anti-Semitism. In view of their small numbers, it was not surprising that their
influence on American foreign and military policy was negligible. Following
four decades of immigration, the 4.8 million American Jews made up 3.7 percent
of the American population. Of the six Jews in the United States House of
Representatives, Seventy sixth Congress, in 1940-1941, four came from New York
City, and one each from Chicago and Philadelphia. There were no Jews in the
United States Senate. There were no Jews in the top positions in the key
government departments of the Roosevelt administration dealing with foreign and
military affairs. None of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States
military were Jews. Anti-Semitism remained a force in the U.S. officer corps.
Roosevelt's only Jewish secretary of the treasury, Henry Morgenthau, lobbied
with little success against resistance from the Department of State to
expanding Jewish emigration to the United States.8
Indeed, citing
domestic anti-Semitism, and displaying some of their own, State Department
officials avoided any focus on the persecution of the Jews, so as not to
intensify already considerable domestic opposition to American intervention in
the war in Europe. Some Jewish leaders agreed, fearing that raising the issue
would only add to American anti-Semitism. American Jews in and outside
government were unable to convince the administration to lift immigration
quotas to aid Jews seeking to escape from Germany. And the wartime surveys was
that anti-Semitism actually increased in American society during World War II.9
Yet the daily and
weekly press directives issued by the Office of Active Propaganda in the
Propaganda Ministry for this period are telling. Take for example the
Periodical Service directive of June 6, 1941. (Note: Showing it’s Christian
roots, the following use of the words Juda’s plan sometimes called Alljudas, was common in Nazi language. They evoked a link
between the Jews and Judas Iscariot, whom the New Testament depicts as having
betrayed Jesus.)
Why relevant now:
England ultimately
ruled by Jewry; same is true of the USA; accordingly, English-North American
plans for conquering the world serve Judas's plan to use, deracinate, and in
this way generally exterminate all non-Jews of all peoples. What is at first
the for us incomprehensible, hostile stance of the USA towards Germany becomes
understandable as soon as one recognizes the degree to which the non-Jewish
citizens of USA are already in the hands of warmongering Jews.
Goal:
Clarity about the aim
of Jews in the USA at any price to destroy and exterminate Germany, which
grasped the Jewish danger in time.
Framework:
Emphasize: In the
USA, even more than in England, there is a Jewish parallel government alongside
the official U.S. government. The latter becomes ever less important, the more
it is filled with Jews selected from the parallel government. Today, this process
can be seen as having already been completed. I 14 The periodicals (who
received the directive) should "avoid injuring or mocking non-Jewish USA
citizens, owing to their apparent acceptance of enslavement by Jewry or their
cowardice in the fight against Jewry and its slaves." Nor should German
periodicals suggest that in spring 1941 it was "too late" to break
the oppression of the Jews in the United States.10
The directive next
drew attention to Hitler's claims in Mein Kampf that the Jews were responsible
for American entry into World War I. The current "warmongering" was
therefore the second Jewish anti-German campaign. The directive asserted that Franklin
D. Roosevelt had "Jewish blood" traceable to Dutch Jewish ancestors
in seventeenth-century Holland. However, Nazi wartime propaganda focused more
on Roosevelt as a servant of the Jews than as a Jew himself. The directive
listed, the king of USA banking and stock exchanges is the Jew l P.
Morgan." Morgan was of course not Jewish, but the Nazis found Jews in many
places of power.
“The Jews in the USA
hold power with the help of the Jewish government, bleed the people white, and
oppress them ... The Jews in the USA have treated the non-Jews [there] exactly
as the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" prescribed. The Jew is on
the way to destroying and annihilating the USA, that is, the USA of nonJewish people and things. In the process and until his
final victory, he uses a modest number of non-Jewish creatures (for the purpose
of more effective camouflage). The non-Jewish residents of the USA face
extermination by the Jews.”
Thus not only were
the Jews threatening to "annihilate" Germany-they were also intending
to "annihilate" non-Jewish Americans. Such directives, bringing the
arcane arguments of the Protocols up to date, were distributed to several thousand
newspapers and periodicals.
On December 10, 1941,
the day before Hitler declared war on the United States, the Propaganda
Ministry sent its customary 125,000 copies of the Word of the Week to be posted
in the familiar prime locations for the greatest visual impact around the
country. "Das judische Komplott
("The Jewish Conspiracy" see below) offered a detailed, indeed
byzantine, diagram of the names and channels of influence of "the Jewish
wire pullers" and their "stooges and accomplices" involved in
the international Jewish plot. Here, in black and yellow, the immense
conspiracy was depicted for all to see. In its apparent exactitude about the
names of particular individuals and their alleged connections to and influence
on one another, the poster was a paradigmatic case of the paranoid vision of
radical anti-Semitic propaganda. Appearing in yellow (a color associated in
Nazi propaganda with the Jews) against a black background, the wall newspaper
combined text and image to draw the eye first to an anti-Semitic caricature of
a male face with oversized ears, nose, and lips, curly hair, heavy eyebrows,
and a small growth of a beard-this was the Jew at the center of the plot. Wide
arrows in striking yellow, showing direction of influence, issue from two Stars
of David named for the two key figures in the international conspiracy, Bernard
Baruch of the United States and "Mosessohn," a sarcastic reference to
the Soviet Politburo member Lazar Kaganovitch. Baruch
exerts direct influence on the non-Jews Roosevelt and Churchill and on the
Jewish bankers Schiff, Warburg, Kahn, Karp, whose names are inscribed between
two Stars of David. Baruch also has a direct link to "Roosevelt's
intimates and leading advisers," identified as "Jews!": Henry
Morgenthau, Felix Frankfurter, New York governor Herbert Lehman, Fiorello
LaGuardia, Sol Bloom (chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee), and an
unidentified Cohen. The arrows of influence stemming from "Mosessohn"
Kaganovich extend to "Finkelstein-Wallach"-that is, former Soviet
foreign minister Maxim Litvinov. “'Mosessohn" Kaganovich influences the
non-Jew Stalin. The circle of influence is completed by a yellow line
connecting Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin.
Once the curiosity of
passersby had been aroused by the striking colors, the arrows, the caricatures,
and the familiar-sounding Jewish names, the viewers' attention might turn to
the text of the poster, which revealed the secrets of this vast and powerful
conspiracy. To the left, the text identified Baruch, Mosessohn, Schiff,
Finkelstein, and Maisky as Jews and asserted that
they were in league with the non-Jews Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin. Below,
text about the Jewish "wire pullers" ("die Jüdischen
Drahtzieher") introduced four points identifying
the images and the connections between them: for example, the "Jevv ... Baruch" was "one of the great warmongers
and war profiteers of the world war, inventor of the Versailles tribute
clauses, close friend and adviser to the Freemason Jewish hireling Roosevelt,
personal friends with Churchill, called today by the Americans the unofficial
president of the USA" LaGuardia, Morgenthau, Bloom, Frankfurter, Lehmann,
Cohen, and Kaufman were "Roosevelt's intimates and associates."
Kaganovich, or "Lazarus, son of Moses Kaganovich," was "Stalin's
only trusted aid, most intimate adviser, deputy, and father-in-law." Maxim
Litvinov and Ivan Maisky were both mentioned, as were
such Jews active in English politics as Leslie Hore- Belisha and Lord
Rothschild.
Among the millions of
Germans who walked past this wall newspaper in that second week of December
1941, those who may have stopped long enough to read the text probably had no
idea whether Roosevelt was really a Freemason, whether Churchill was a Jewish
father-in-law (Judenschwiegervater), or whether
Stalin had married Kaganovich's daughter. They would have had only a smattering
of information about who Baruch, Kaganovich, and the others were; however,
especially after Hitler declared war on the United States on December 11, they
did know that Russia, England, and the United States were now at war with Nazi
Germany. The image and text of the wall newspaper offered a seemingly
compelling explanation of how the Jews, so few in number, could have been so
successful in plotting against Germany. Perhaps the passerby would have been
impressed by all the specific names and the graphic illustration of the arrows
of influence, not to mention its technical expertise. For those immersed in the
Nazi context, it could also convey the impression of a complex, well-researched
and compelling causal explanation of why it was that three of the most powerful
countries in the world were at war with Nazi Germany. Surely not all the names
could be fictional. Surely some part of this conspiracy must exist. The
Propaganda Ministry had not pulled Bernard Baruch and Lazar Kaganovich out of
thin air. Of course, to people outside Nazi Germany the wall newspaper would
have appeared, as it appears today, to be crackpot realism based on a
combination of mental derangement, political fantasy, unjustified hatred,
pathetically erroneous causal connections, and inferences-all of which amounted
to a sick grotesque falsification. Yet the Germans gazing at this wall
newspaper during that week of short, cold, mostly gray December days were
within Nazism's grasp and thus had access to no alternative explanation of how
political decisions were being made in Moscow, London, and Washington and how
or whether Jews had any impact whatsoever on them. Some unknown number of
pedestrians turned away from the wall newspaper in disgust and anger, appalled
at the distortions of the criminals in charge of their government. Yet an
equally unknown though larger group of passersby in all likelihood believed
that "The Jewish Conspiracy" taught them a great deal about the world
as it really was.11
On December 11, 1941,
Hitler declared war on the United States in a speech to the Reichstag broadcast
over German radio and printed in full in the German press. His central point
was that "a single man," Roosevelt, "and the forces driving him"
were the cause of World War II. "The brain trust that the new
American president must serve consists of the members of the same people we
fought in Germany as a parasitic appearance of humanity and which we began to
push out of (German) public life. "The "circle of Jews surrounding
him" encouraged his foreign policy initiatives. They were "motivated
by Old Testament greed" and he was a man of "utterly satanic
perfidy." This tactic of diversion was a key reason for Roosevelt's
meddling in European affairs. "We know what powers stand
behind Roosevelt. It is the eternal Jew who thinks his time has come to inflict
on us what we shudder to see and must experience in Soviet Russia," It
was, he continued, "Franklin Roosevelt's and the Jews' intention to
destroy one state after another." The war was a matter of the
"existence or nonexistence" of nations, Roosevelt and the Jews
"would now exterminate National Socialist Germany." 12
On the left,
"The Jewish Conspiracy", December 10, 1941, Reich Propaganda
Directorate of the Nazi Party. Landeshauptarehiv
Koblenz, no. 1709. On the right,"The Jew:
Instigator of the War, Prolonger of the War," Ministry for Public
Enlightenment and Propaganda, Bundesarchiv Koblenz,
Germany, no, 003-020-022.
Then on November 26,
1942, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem cast from Berlin a speech on German radio in
Arabic in what became a striking example of the translation of Nazi propaganda
into the idioms in the Arab world even today.” Jews and capitalists have pushed
the United States to expand this war, in order to expand their influence in new
and wealthy areas.- America is the greatest agent of the Jews, and the Jews are
rulers in America. The Arab peoples had shed "noble blood" for the
freedom and independence of Palestine, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian
peninsula. "The martyr's death is the protective tree in whose
shadows marvelous plants again bloom." 13
The leading Nazi
propagandist, Johann von Leers, in "Judentum und
Islam als Gegensiitze,"
contrast Islam and Jews as opposites.14 He further
pointed to apparent intellectual and moral foundations for an alliance between
the Third Reich and radicalized Arabs and fundamentalist Muslims. Van Leers
applauded what he depicted as Islam's long history of anti-Jewish sentiment and
action. "Unquestionably, one result of Muhammad's hostility to the Jews
was that oriental Jewry was completely paralyzed by Islam. Jewry's resistance
was broken.
In contrast to
Europe, where the Jews were allowed to receive interest or engage in theft, the
Arab and Islamic world kept the Jews in a state of fear. "If the rest of
the world adopted a similar policy, we would not have a Jewish question today."
Hence von Leers celebrated "the immortal contribution of the religion of
Islam." It prevented the threatened domination of Arabia by the Jews. In
so doing, Islam "opened the path to a higher culture [and] gave its
adherents an education and human form that still today makes a Muslim who is serious
about his faith one of the most noble phenomena in this confused and chaotic
world." 15
And when finally that
same month word reached England about the atrocities in Poland 16, Propaganda Minister Goebells
wrote, on December 12, 1942, "The atrocity campaign about Poland and the
Jewish question is assuming enormous dimensions on the other side. I fear that
over time we cannot master the issue with silence. We have to have some kind of
answer ... It is best to go over to the offensive and talk about English
atrocities in India or in the Middle East. Perhaps that will get the English to
keep quiet. In any case, by doing so, we change the subject and raise another
issue." 17
The Allied
declaration regarding the murder of Europe's Jews took place a day before the
opening of the Islamic Institute in Berlin. Grand Mufti al-Husseini gave a
speech at the event in which he argued that Arabs, and indeed all Muslims,
should support the Nazi cause. The Koran, he continued, was full of stories of
Jewish lack of character, Jewish lies and deceptions. Just as they had been
full of hatred against Muslims in the days of the Prophet, so they were in
modern times.AI-Husseini then misconstrued Chaim Weizmann as having said that
World War II was a "Jewish war." 18
In his last lead
editorial in Das Reich on January 21, 1945, Goebbels wrote: "Who drives
the Russians, English, and Americans into the fire, and sacrifices masses of
foreign lives in a hopeless struggle against the German people? The Jews! Who
invents new programs of hatred and extermination against us, and in so doing
makes this war into an awful act of horrendous self-slaughter and
self-annihilation of Europe's life, its economy, education, and culture? The
Jews! Who justifies this perverse political situation with a cynical
hypocrisy and fear? ... Jews, only the
Jews! " 19
Thus to the end,
Goebbels never wavered from the deluded but internally consistent anti-Semitic
explanation for why Nazi Germany was about to lose the war: it had been
betrayed and abandoned, one might say "stabbed in the back" by the
Western Allies, who had succumbed to Jewish domination. In the minds of the
Nazi leaders, World War II ended as World War I had, with noble Germany
betrayed. This time, though, betrayal did not come from within, as in
1918-1919, but from abroad, at the hands of the Western, Jewish plutocracies.
Goebbels argued, in effect, that Jewish power and policy making in London and
Washington had prevented Nazi Germany from winning the war. In February 1945,
the propaganda minister held the Jews responsible for the Third Reich's impending
defeat. As the chroniclers of the death marches of spring 1945 have recalled in
recent years, "revenge" continued up to the very end against the
relentless and soon-to-be-victorious foe.20
1) The Gospel
According to St. Matthew 27:20-22, 24-26 in which the Jews are said to have
selected Barabbas to live and Jesus to die. The multitude tell Pilate,
"Let him [Jesus] be crucified" and "His blood be on us, and on
our children" (p. 9). The latter quotation might suggest to people
inclined toward prejudice that this warrants the Jews deserving any pain and
suffering that comes their way, i.e., pogroms, the Holocaust. The animosity
that spread from antisemitic writings such as the aforementioned quotation in
the New Testament--animosity that has continued for centuries and is still
prevalent to this day--explains in part why Jews are scapegoated; antisemitism,
in part, allowed Nazis and their sympathizers to excuse and justify their
genocidal acts while inciting soldiers to participate in the Holocaust.
1 Adolf Hitler, Mein
Kampf, trans. Ralph Mannheim, 1971, p. 679.
2 Adolf Hitler,
Political Testament/Politisches Testament: Die Bormann-Diktate vom Februar und
April 1945, Hamburg, 1981,69.
3 From,
Friedrich Arnold, 220 Politische Plakate als Dokumente der Deutschen
Geschichte, 1900-1980, p.198 S.
4 Germany, Bundesarchiv Koblenz, no. 003-020-020.
5 For the historical
context here, see also L. Albertini, Origins of the First World War: Nazi
Germany's Ultimate War Plans to Attack the United States.
6 Arendt, The Origins
of Totalitarianisrn, 1958, p. 343.
7 On the
radicalization of the application of the terms Vernichtung
and Vernichtungskrieg from Clausewitz to Verdun in
World War I and then to the Nazi war on the eastern front in World War II, see
Jan Phillip Reemtsma, "Die Idee des Vernichtungskrieges:
Clausewitz, Ludendorff, Hitler," in Hannes Heer and Klaus Naumann, eds. Vernichtungskrieg: Verbrechen der
Wehrmacht, 1941-1944, 1995, pp. 377-401.
8 See Peter Novick,
The Holocaust in American Life, 1999.
9 See Henry L.
Feingold, A Time for Searching: Entering the Mainstream, 1920-1945, Johns
Hopkins University Press, 1992.
10 "Themen der
Zeit: Juden in USA!" Zeitschriften-Dienst 110, no.
4676, June 6, 1941: 6-9. From the
offices of Anti-Semitische
Aktion and the Archiv des Reichsministeriums fur Volksaufklärung und Propaganda.
11 "Das jüdische
Komplott" December 10, 1941, available
in Bestand 712, Plakate, Wandzeitung Parole der Woche, no.
1709, Folge 50 (1941),Germany, Landeshauptarchiv Koblenz.
12 VIdRMVP, 326/41, December
12,1941, ZSg. 109/28, BAK, SO, Landeshauptarchiv
Koblenz.
13 Amin al-Husseini, speech no. 45a,
"Rundfunkrede an die Nordafrikaner," November 25-26, 1942, Hopp,
Mufti-Papiere: Briefe, Memoranden, Reden und Aufrufe Amin al-Husainis aus dem Exil, 1940-1945, 2001, p. 216.
14 "Judentum und
Islam als Gegensiitze," Die Judenfrage 6, no. 24, December 24, 1942:
275-278.
15 Ibid., p. 278.
16 plus see also,
Representatives Assail Mass Murder of Jews by Germany," New York Times,
December 5,1942, p. 9.
17 Goebbels noted
that the Propaganda Ministry would thus create a "propaganda
campaign" similar to what the English were doing with the Jewish question,
entry for December 12, 1942, in Tagebücher von Joseph
Goebbels, ed. Elke Frohlich, 1994, II/6.
18 Amin al-Husseini,
"Nr. 55: Rede zur Eroffnung des Islamischen
Zentral- Instituts in Berlin, 18.12.1942.
19 "Der Krieg
und die Juden," in Der steile Aufstieg, pp. 263-270.
20 The story in the
New York Times "Goebbels Turns Fire on 'Jewish Problem," May 9, 1943,
p. 34.
For updates
click homepage here