Race and
Literary Nationalism
Theosophy’s emerging spiritual trends proclaiming "a universal
brotherhood of man" are concurrent with theories of racial hierarchy in
nineteenth-century culture.
Annie Besant's attraction to theosophy may well have been a fascination
for the racial theories of Madame Blavatsky and other occultists like Colonel
Olcott, A. P. Sinnett, and Charles Leadbeater.
Theories of racial separation and the dominance of some races over others
fed into a reading of history that was partly informed by Fabian socialism, but
it produced a strange admixture of dialectical materialism, Darwinian science,
and metaphysics, in which the progression toward syncretic realization followed
the route of territorial expansion, conquest, and imperial rule.
As George Bemard Shaw remarked, it was no secret that Besant's turn
toward theosophy was dramatically quickened by her chance reading of
Blavatsky's Secret Doctrine, a book full of extravagant accounts of the
evolution of races, which is narrated alongside an equally tendentious account
of geological formation.
But however powerful the work's influence, Besant kept a notably aloof
perspective on Blavatsky's racial classification and adapted it to her own
developing millenarian vision. In her reconstruction, the positivist legacy of
secularism and socialism overrode pure metaphysical abstractions. This is
particularly evident in Besant's reading of the historical spread of empires as
a function of racial and biological differentiation. Observing that the
evolution of races goes through cycles of growth, maturity and decay, Besant
contended that you must look at the life of races as you look at the life of persons. Looking at the history of races in the past may
guide us in our forecast as to the role of a race in the present.
Each great division of the human race, each
strongly marked type of racial character, has its own growth and development,
its time of widespread empire, and then again its time
of slow and gradual decay. 1)
Besant describes colonial expansion and territorial conquest as a
migration of races for the ultimate enrichment of the "Fifth Race."
This sweep of time, measured in aeons and evolving land-masses, dissolves the political immediacy of
imperialism. Besant remarks that the race of Teutons, who are classified in her
scheme as the fifth sub-race of the Fifth Race, is now spreading over the
world, [and] has occupied the greater part of North America, driving before it
the old Atlantean stock; it has seized Australia and New Zealand, the remnants
of still more ancient Lemuria, and the poor relics of that dying Race are
vanishing before it. High is it rearing its proud head over the countries of
the globe, destined to build a world-wide Empire, and to sway the destinies of the civilization.2)
The intricate mythology of the five root-races and their various
sub-races (the sixth is yet to come, or so say the theosophists) is heavily
influenced by Blavatsky's commentary on The Stanzas of Dzyan
in The Secret Doctrine.
Despite individual differences between theosophists, there is remarkably
little divergence in the evolutionary scheme they present. In fact, the
impression of a lack of originality evoked by their common discourse works
eerily on the reader, who is made to feel that this new mythology is virtually
interchangeable with science, so strongly is its content fixed and closed to
interpretation.
Theosophist Geoffrey Barborka's update of
theosophical wisdom, The Story of Human Evolution (1979), follows Voltaire and
specifically invokes Genesis in the preface to claim a biblical precedent for
describing human evolution in inflated terms:
"There were giants in die earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the
daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the
same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown" (Genesis 6:4).
To recapitulate the evolutionary scheme briefly as presented in
theosophy: the first two races are distinguished from the succeeding three in
that they are self-born and sexless, their evolution being coterminous with the
formation of land masses and oceans. Sexuality, differentiation, and identity
commence with the third root-race. The disclaimer that the term root-race ,,has no connection with the ideas associated with
ethnic groups or racial strains" is immediately nullified by the very
language of classification and hierarchy. 3)
Even without further detail, the admission that each race is associated
with a particular homeland makes a mockery of the disclaimer.
The First Race is described as having inhabited the never-changing North
Pole; the Second Race, as arising in die Hyperborean or northern Asia; the
third Race, as subdivided between the areas called Southern Lemuria, which
embrace Africa, southern Asia, and the Pacific islands, and Northern Lemuria,
which consists largely of Europe; the Fourth Race, or the first real members of
the ,,human species" who, in the seventh sub-race, inhabited the areas
between China and Indonesia; and the Fifth Race, which is dispersed across the
seven continents and each sub-race of which has inaugurated a settled
civilization in each continent. According to modern theosophy, the Sixth Race
is yet to come, and when it does, it is expected to appear first in southern California ! 4)
The last sub-race of each root-race constitutes the first sub-race of the
next root-race, so that the contributions of Chinese civilization (the seventh
sub-race of the Fourth Race) provide the foundations for die variegated
civilizations of all sub-races in the Fifth Race. Furthermore, each race is
associated with a particular color, the surviving ones, expectedly, being
yellow, brown, black, and red. Most compromising of all, though this esoteric
mythology claims not to refer to ethnicity or racial strains, historical
development is nonetheless accounted for in polygenetic terms.
Ethnicized explanation clearly
obviates theosophy's purported syncretic ambition of seeking oneness amidst
diversity: While [esoteric philosophy] assigns to humanity a oneness of origin,
in so far that its forefathers or "Creators" were all divine beings-though
of different classes or degrees of perfection in their hierarchy-men were
nevertheless born on seven different centers of the continent of that period.
Though all were of one common origin, yet for reasons given their
potentialities and mental capabilities, outward or physical forms, and future
characteristics, were very different. Some superior, others inferior, to suit
the Karma of the various reincarnating Monads which could not be all of the same degree of purity in their last births in
other worlds. This accounts for the difference of races, the inferiority of the
savage, and other human varieties. 5)
But although the racial mythology of Madame Blavatsky and other
theosophists was so wildly extravagant, Annie Besant's redescription of the
same scheme was far more precise, recognizable, and perhaps even acceptable to
those among her contemporaries who were familiar with Renan's work on racial
typologies.
What is perhaps most striking about Besant's use of evolutionary science,
was her systematic reading of the evolution of races in terms of a cultural
science that undergirds political relations, affecting
such things as, for instance, the ideal conditions for the rule of one people by another. 6)
The reason why England and Ireland cannot get on together is because
England belongs to the Teutonic sub-race, in which the concrete mind is most
developed, while the Kelts (the Irish are Kelts) belong to the fourth sub-race
and emotion is strong in them. Because the English are not imaginative enough
to understand them, because in them the concrete scientific mind is the
dominant thing, they can never understand an emotional, impulsive people. So they try to keep them by force.... They have not the common sense to rule people according to their own type,
and not according to a different type. 7)
In other words, colonial rule results when there is a lack of
synchronicity between races, a failure of understanding that makes its effects
felt in abiding differences of culture, language, and tradition. In the absence
of racial unity, argues Besant, these cultural differences can only be
negotiated by the exercise of force.
The language of evolutionary science permeates this statement, as the
ultimate point of Besant's analysis is that the subordination of one group of
people to another is racially constituted, since each belongs to "a
different type." Only when a society is truly composed of one single race
will it ever attain a condition of self-governability; until then, peoples all over the world are subject to control by others.
It is by thus falling back on inexorable historical (racial) evolution
that Annie Besant provided a radically different twist to the construction of a
nationalist narrative, which conventionally sees alien rule as a disruption-
not fulfillment, as Besant does-of the imperatives of self-determination.
And so humanity progresses from competition to cooperation, and learns the lesson of Brotherhood. 8)
Besant establishes continuity between her socialist principles and her
theosophical program of cultural advancement, despite the apparent esotericism
of the latter.
Similarly, Besant's use of reincarnated souls traversing through world
history and world empires functions as a rhetorical device to argue for the
fulfillment of a racial plan by imperial conquest:
Now it is to us Theosophists significant and interesting that the bulk of
the Souls to whom this offer is made have twice before builded
an Empire and have carried its burden; for the majority of tile Souls that made
the Egyptian Empire lived again upon earth in the Roman Republic and Empire,
and have been and are being born into the Anglo-Saxon, and indeed into the
whole Teutonic, race. Men who wrought in the Rome on the Tiber are working now
in the Rome on the Thames, and are again
Empire-building. 10)
The reappearance of the same racial traits in more dominant forms and in
future historical moments is encoded in the language of reincarnation. 11)
1) Annie Besant, The Secret of Evolution (Harrogate: Theosophical
Publishing Committee, 19?), p.5.
2) Annie Besant, The Pedigree of Man (Benares and London: Theosophical
Publishing Society, 1904), pp. 150-51.
3) Geoffrey Barborka, The Story of Human Evolution (Madras: Theosophical
Publishing House, 1979), p. 18.
4) See Charles Leadbeater, The Beginnings of the Sixth Root Race (Madras:
Theosophical Publishing House, 1920).
5) The Stanzas of Dzyan, II:249; quoted in
Barborka, The Story of Human Evolution, p. 52. See also Joscelyn Godwin, The
Theosophical Enlightenment (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994),
for an overview of a wide assortment of theosophical themes, ranging from initiates
to animal magnetism.
6) See Young, Colonial Desire, chap. 3, ,,The
Complicity of Culture: Arnold's Ethnographic Politics," for a thoughtful
reading of Arnold's idea of culture as racially composed.
7) Annie Besant, The Inner Government of the World (Madras: Theosophical
Publishing House, 1920), p. 47.
8) Besant, Pain, p. 13.
9) Besant, Theosophy and Imperialism, p. 7.
10) Ibid., p. 3.
11) Besant, The Inner Government of the World, p. 21.
For updates click homepage here
August 20, 2002