By Eric
Vandenbroeck 19 Nov. 2018
While it is known
that Robert Mueller is looking at multi-state
collusion, ever since US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo 16
Oct. meeting with the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) rumors
have been circulating that the discussion was all about how
to absolve MBS and to develop a roadmap how to insulate MBS from the
scandal. As known from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, already
late 2015 in a meeting attended by the
brother of MBA Mohammed bin Zayed, Arab leaders decided that a wildcard
presidential candidate in the shape of Trump
could be the key to their plans to become the new regional hegemons. Thus
before Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, seemed implicated in
the killing of Jamal Khashoggi, American intelligence agencies were trying to
solve a separate mystery: Was the prince laying the groundwork for building an
atomic bomb? Hence in addition to my analyses in part one and part
two, here a brief postscript as to why the
Khashoggi case might receive even more traction going forward.
Three
months before the 2016 election, a small group gathered at Trump Tower.
Erik Prince, the private security contractor and the former head of Blackwater,
arranged the meeting, which took place on Aug. 3, 2016. The
emissary, well-connected Lebanese-American businessman named George Nader,
told Donald Trump Jr. that the princes who led Saudi Arabia and the United Arab
Emirates were eager to help his father win election as president. The social
media specialist, Joel Zamel, extolled his company’s
ability to give an edge to a political campaign; by that time, the firm had
already drawn up a multimillion-dollar proposal for a social media manipulation
effort to help elect Trump.
The August 2016
meeting, not surprising, has echoes of another Trump
Tower meeting two months earlier, also under scrutiny by the special
counsel, when Donald Trump Jr. and other top campaign aides met with a Russian
lawyer after being promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton.
Of course, we
understand Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the UAE all view Iran as their chief
regional enemy. Iran is propped up by Russia. Therefore the Saudis, Israelis,
and Emiratis all need a US government willing to find a way to get the Kremlin
to stop supporting Iran in the Middle East.
The best way to get
Russia to stop supporting Iran-or reduce support-was/is to drop all sanctions
on Russia over its 2014 annexation of Crimea, as
that'd be worth trillions to the Kremlin over the next decade. Everyone knew
that Clinton wouldn't do this-and that Trump would.
Thus the Saudis’
desire for nuclear power and, eventually, the right to build a nuclear weapon;
the Emiratis’ own nuclear ambitions; Saudi and Emirati hostility toward Iran,
and particularly Iranian involvement in the war in Syria; Russian construction
firms’ opposition to U.S. sanctions, which are hindering them from making tens
of billions of dollars building new nuclear reactors in Saudi Arabia and the
United Arab Emirates; and Russian actions relative to the war in Syria, which
are ostensibly being coordinated with Russia’s ally, Iran. These issues engage
parties that don’t at first appear connected to one another, but at least part
of their correlation involves the United States dropping sanctions against the
Kremlin in exchange for the promise of a big financial windfall for Trump and
his relatives.
The August 2016
overture followed an
intense and secretive lobbying push involving Michael Flynn, Tom Barrack,
Rick Gates and even Iran-Contra figure Robert McFarlane.
As the transition
team does its work in December 2016, a small (if overlapping) group of
additional Trump aides, associates, and allies-including Michael Flynn, Tom
Barrack, Rick Gates, and Bud McFarlane-do a different sort of work: they lobby Trump
to give nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia so that Russian companies and
others can get billions of dollars in contracts to build nuclear reactors in
the Middle East. The proposal would “require
lifting sanctions on Russia,” according to Reuters, to allow currently sanctioned
Russian companies to partner with American entities to build reactors in Saudi
Arabia and the United Arab Emirates-the latter nation, too, because, under the
terms of a deal signed many years ago by the United States, if the American
government relaxes nuclear-weapon safeguards on Saudi Arabia, a “gold standard”
clause from a past U.S.-UAE nuclear deal would ultimately entitle the UAE to
enrich uranium as well.
Underneath Trump at King
Khalid International Airport on 22 May 2, 2017, in Saudi Arabia.
But the Saudis,
Emiratis, Israelis, and Russians didn't offer the Trumps pre-election collusive
assistance for free-indeed they asked for a lot.
Using the carrot and
a stick approach following a meeting between MBS and Trump, Khalid al-Falih,
the kingdom's energy minister, said in an interview that if the U.S. is not
with us, they
will lose the opportunities on a range of issues.
Trump adviser Erik
Prince-who was also at the secret meeting with the above mentioned George Nader
(who
The Middle East Eye reported proposed to start an "elite group" that would
supersede the Gulf Cooperation Council), Zamel,
and Don Jr. at Trump Tower in August '16-ran a mercenary army. Elliott Broidy,
who had enormous access to Trump as a lobbyist and RNC finance co-chair, also
was connected
to a mercenary company. Kushner-who wasn't at the August '16 meeting but
would attend a followup in December with MBZ (who
secretly entered the US for the meeting), Bannon, and the Zamel-connected
Mike Flynn-struck up a very close "friendship" with
MBS post-election.
Below Erik Prince
Special Counsel
Robert Mueller has obtained evidence that calls into question Congressional
testimony given by Trump supporter and Blackwater founder Erik Prince last
year, when
he described a meeting in Seychelles with a Russian financier close to Vladimir
Putin. Prince denies that is the case and says it was a chance meeting after
he went to the island to meet the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Mohamed bin
Zayed...and that Zayed brought with him Hamad al Mazroie,
the de facto head of the United Arab Emirates intelligence service. He also brought
Mohammed Dahlan, a bin Zayed adviser who is fluent in Russian and is seen
as a conduit from the UAE to Putin's Kremlin. Prince did not disclose both
men's presence when he testified under oath about the meeting to the House
Intelligence Committee.
In fact Prince’s
claim to have had no formal communication or contact with Trump’s campaign is
contradicted by revelations about the above mentioned August 3, 2016, Trump
Tower meeting Prince set up between himself, Donald Trump Jr., George Nader,
and Joel Zamel. The inquiry into the meetings
suggests there is growing interest by the Mueller team into whether foreign
financing, specifically
from Gulf states, has influenced President Donald Trump and his
administration.
Numerous reports furthermore say Kushner
got intel from his father-in-law's Presidential Daily Briefing-which only
Trump could permit him to take-and gave it to MBS. The intel-a list of MBS'
enemies-allowed MBS to target his domestic enemies and kill some of them. MBS
subsequently told friends that
Kushner was "in his pocket." And why would he think otherwise?
Trump had (apparently) declassified intel for MBS' use as part of his program
of domestic and international assassination. It was that very program that
targeted Jamal Khashoggi.
So no one was
surprised when Trump said he
believed MBS wasn't involved in the killing because MBS told him he wasn't.
The above five-party
collusion also explains
why Trump went to Saudi Arabia first on his first trip abroad and
immediately sold them weapons. The trip organized and pushed for by Kushner,
who is chummy
with MBS and has acted as the de facto ambassador to Saudi Arabia.
Khashoggi was not banned from Saudi media for his criticisms of MBS, but rather
for his
criticisms of Donald Trump. More importantly, U.S. intelligence knew of a plan
to lure Khashoggi back to arrest him, so the president and the de facto
ambassador to Saudi Arabia must have also known.
Last October, Jared
Kushner paid an unannounced visit to Riyadh, where it’s
reported that he stayed up until the wee hours talking “strategy” with the
crown prince, apparently his new BFF. He allegedly
gave MBS an “enemies list” culled from the classified president’s daily brief,
which MBS seems to have used the following month to purge disloyal relatives
from government and take their money. Also last October, Kushner’s company received
a $57 million loan from Fortress Investment Group, which was recently purchased
by SoftFund, a Saudi investment concern, to bail
out its troubled property at One Journal Square in Jersey City. (A larger and
more widely-reported
loan, to bail out the troubled property at 666 Fifth Avenue, came the
following summer, via Qatar.)
It is also not surprising
why Kushner uses WhatsApp for all his MBS communications (it frustrates
oversight); why Prince was Trump's envoy to Russia in Seychelles, why Broidy
was given $1 billion in business by Nader; why Nader met with White House
officials repeatedly in the first 60 days of Trump's administration; why
Mueller originally suspected Papadopoulos as an Israeli spy; why Flynn,
Barrack, Gates, and other Trump allies began lobbying Trump as soon as he was
elected to send
nuclear tech to Saudi Arabia (partly to build new nuclear reactors but with
a longer-term goal of letting Saudi Arabia and the UAE develop nuclear weapons
as a deterrence of Iran); why Trump ripped up the Iran deal even though Iran
was in compliance; and more. Look: we know Trump's top aides were willing to
assist foreign nations in assassinating people living in the U.S., because
that's what Mike Flynn was caught trying to do-extradite
a Turkish cleric to be killed abroad.
In fact just four
days ago, Trump now suddenly floated
the idea of handing over this Turkish dissident Fethullah Gülen to
Erdogan’s government. a move for which Trump's former national security adviser
Flynn was
offered $15 million by the Turks to achieve this result.
The reason some of
the above is confusing is that some of the motives in play may have been
reasonable. Iran 'is' a state sponsor of terrorism-so it's not so far out of
bounds to think that a U.S. government might want to assist Iran's many enemies
in the Middle East if possible. But a reality is also the Trumps are trying to
expand (and 'have'
expanded) their real estate empire into the UAE, which makes pleasing the
Emiratis important as
a business proposition. Or as Trump said ‘I
love the Saudis’.
There are also other angles,
for instance, one wouldn't normally think Bannon would be at all the planning
meetings for Trump-Russia-Saudi-Emirati-Israeli collusion-but it makes sense
when you understand that Zamel and Cambridge Analytica were crucial to the plan.
Flynn's involvement
might also be a mystery until you learn that Zamel had previously tried to recruit him for his intel
outfit (Flynn had one too), and Flynn
thereafter became an energy lobbyist trying to bring nuclear energy (thus,
eventually, weapons) to Saudi Arabia.
One of the additional
oddities in this whole story is Dmitry Rybolovlev who
received a huge cash donation from MBS in the form of what possible was a fake
painting.
Dmitry Rybolovlev, of
course, was the Russian billionaire who
in the summer of 2008 paid an inflated price for a property Trump thus made
a $54 million profit. Rybolovlev apparently also had two
secret tarmac meetings with Trump himself in the 10 days before the 2016
election. Whereby Rybolovlev came in the Mueller investigation orbit due to
Rybolovlev's
connections with the above mentioned Joel Zamel.
In other words, a Rybolovlev agent offers Trump Jr. a Russia
disinformation campaign in the presence of an MBS agent, MBS apparently
offers to bankroll it, Trump Jr. says yes. A year later, an MBS agent overpays
Rybolovlev by $300 million plus for a painting.
The plausible reason Nader
an MBS agent offers collusive assistance to the Trumps at the
same secret Trump Tower meeting at which Zamel (a
Rybolovlev agent) pitches a disinformation campaign mirroring Russia's is if
the Saudis can bankroll it. So MBS 'owed' Rybolovlev. What is more, the
painting is possible a fake, making the transaction even more suspicious.
But so this appears
to be Mueller's theory of the case with respect to Trump-Russia: that it is a
bribery, money laundering, fraud, and conspiracy case involving multiple
nations.
Where this might go next?
Asked in Congress
last March about his secret negotiations with the Saudis, Energy Secretary Rick
Perry dodged a question about whether the Trump administration would insist
that the kingdom be banned from producing nuclear fuel.
Eight months later,
the administration will not say where the negotiations stand. Now lurking
behind the transaction is the question of whether a Saudi government that
assassinated Mr. Khashoggi and repeatedly changed its story about the murder
can be trusted with nuclear fuel and technology. Such fuel can be used for
benign or military purposes: If uranium is enriched to 4 percent purity, it can
fuel a power plant; at 90 percent it can be used for a bomb.
Nuclear experts said
Prince Mohammed should have been disqualified from receiving nuclear help as
soon as he raised the prospect of acquiring atomic weapons to counter Iran.
One of the core
challenges for the Trump administration thus is that it has declared that Iran
can never be trusted with any weapons-making technology. Now, it must decide
whether to draw the same line for the Saudis.
P.S.
This historic
complexity makes the Trump-Russia story exceptionally
difficult to report on using conventional methods alone. And it has led
some members of the public and the press to misunderstand the significance of
parts of Mueller’s investigation, or even doubt its importance – a fact which
Trump and his cronies have tried to capitalize on by calling the probe a
witch-hunt, a hoax, and fake news.
For instance, the
American media has often uncritically reported White House claims that
candidate Trump lacked much connection to Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, Flynn or
Papadopoulos – all of whom have since been convicted of charges brought against
them by Mueller. But these reports don’t exhibit an awareness of the full
stories of how Trump came to know each of these men, and of their respective
roles in Trump’s campaign – stories which, together with other facts, establish
that Trump colluded with the Russians and, in doing so, violated of a number of
federal criminal statutes.
Oversights like this
are not the result of media incompetence, laziness or malfeasance, however. The
truth is banaler: the archive of prior relevant
reporting that any reporter could review before they publish their own research
is now so large and far-flung that more and more articles are frustratingly
incomplete or even accidentally erroneous than was the case when there were
fewer media outlets, a smaller and more readily navigable archive of past
reporting for reporters to sift through, and a less internationalized media
landscape.
P.1, 12 Aug. 2018: The Trump/Russia
investigation what can be said today.
P.2, 17 Nov. 2018: What Robert Mueller Knows.
P.4, 8 Dec. 2018: The start of Robert Mueller
endgame.
For
updates click homepage here