By Eric Vandenbroeck and co-workers
When Europe Fell Apart
89 was a year of
miracles—not just for Garton Ash, the distinguished British historian and
journalist who identifies “Europe” and “freedom” as the causes closest to his
heart. Today, as the continent sees the rise of anti-liberal populism and its
largest land war since World War II, that moment of triumph has become a
distant memory.
The downward turn of
recent years serves as a reminder that the democratization of European states
is a much more recent and fragile process than many Europeans realize. Garton
Ash was born in 1955 into a Europe of dictatorships. In his youth, 289 million
Europeans lived in democracies, while 389 million suffered under authoritarian
regimes—not just the ones beyond the Iron Curtain but those in Southern Europe
as well. Francoists would still raise their right arm with a fascist salute;
the Greek colonels who came to power in 1967 would not only torture and kill
but also ban “long hair, mini-skirts and the study of sociology,” he writes.
It was the collective
memory of war and authoritarianism, in Garton Ash’s telling, that drove postwar
European peace and integration. Yet, after two decades that consolidated a free
way of life on the continent, Garton Ash writes, this “memory engine” appears
to be sputtering. No country has joined the European Union since 2013; Britons
voted to leave the bloc; war and the entrenchment of autocratic figures such as
Hungary’s Viktor Orban have threatened the EU’s eastern flank.
Homelands deftly traces the transformations of the
European project. It is a deeply moving journey through the past 50 years, as
well as a reckoning with liberalism that holds lessons for what Garton Ash sees
as a new era beginning with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of
Ukraine. It is also a meditation on the nature of history itself and what it
means to write its first draft—an art that Garton Ash, straddling journalism
and academia, has been refining for half a century.
Garton Ash is the
most European of Englishmen but also the most English among Europeans. Fluent
in many languages, a tireless traveler on the continent where he considers many
countries “homelands,” he has long sought to explain to the British the people
they regard as funny foreigners. (He and other historians convinced former
British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher that German unification posed no
perils. In the end, he writes, the Iron Lady decided to “be very nice to the
Germans.”) He has also been an essential voice in foreign policy elsewhere:
Former U.S. President George W. Bush, before his first trip to Europe, asked
him innocently whether the United States should want the EU to succeed;
generations of German politicians, especially when post-1989 insecurities about
a new global role for the country became acute, have sought Garton Ash’s
counsel.
In Homelands—a
personal, but not intimate, book—Garton Ash recounts his youthful travels
around the continent when it was still a world of borders and different
currencies scarcely imaginable to today’s youth, used to the euro and
low-budget airlines. He settled in East Berlin to work on a doctorate in German
history but was drawn into writing about current affairs. After writing a book
on the dictatorship in East Germany, he witnessed the beginnings of Solidarity,
the Polish trade union striving for freedom, in the early 1980s.
Garton Ash shows
brilliantly how different factors aligned for Europe to triumph in 1989. The
’80s were the age of Eurosclerosis when the project
of integration was stalling and fears of nuclear war and environmental
catastrophe dominated public debates across the continent. (Garton Ash noted in
his diary on Dec. 31, 1980, in all capital letters: “We will see a nuclear war
in this decade.”) In his account, individuals made the difference: Thatcher,
Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, and U.S. President Ronald Reagan, obviously,
but also German Chancellor Helmut Kohl and European Commission President
Jacques Delors.
The prospect of
completing the single European market by 1992, along with plans to introduce
the euro—which preexisted the fall of the Wall—made Europe look attractive
again. Even Gorbachev saw what he called a “giant rising” next to the decaying
Soviet empire—an impression that strengthened his resolve to create a “common
European home” (one of the many expressions in the book one cannot help but
read with bitterness after Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022).
Leaders came to trust
one another, and leadership changes were fortunate: Gorbachev preferred the
sober George H.W. Bush—who wisely refrained from any triumphalist talk when the
Soviet Union crumbled—to his predecessor. Leaders also came to trust different
European peoples: Gorbachev, for instance, was moved by his enthusiastic
reception in West Germany in the spring of 1989, not least among steelworkers
in Dortmund, where chants of “Gorbi, Gorbi” gave rise to the neologism “Gorbimania.”
The Soviet leader left convinced that the two German states might be allowed to
unify without threatening European peace.
The danger was that,
in retrospect, reaching political scientist Francis Fukuyama’s “end of
history”—or the triumph of liberal democracy—could seem inevitable. Garton Ash
writes it was a “one-in-a-million piece of historical luck.” Contingency always
matters; sometimes stars, and human courage and luck, align in what Garton Ash
calls the “struggle for freedom”—and often, they don’t.
The years between the
fall of the Wall and the financial crisis feature in the book under the
somewhat deceptive heading “Triumphing.” As we know now—and as Garton Ash makes
abundantly clear—they are better described as decades of hubris and
disillusionment. Freedom no doubt advanced as Central and Eastern European
countries, in fits and starts, established democracies and markets, and
prepared to join NATO and the EU. As the Polish dissident Adam Michnik once
said, Central Europeans wanted “Liberty, Fraternity, Normality.” Yet, Garton
Ash writes, “getting to that non-experimental normality would require a huge
experiment,” often in shock therapies, as liberal democracy and capitalist
economies were created simultaneously. That experiment was not always
unsuccessful: While it may have seemed that Poles were getting only shocks and
no therapy, the average Polish family may have a higher
standard of living than
the average British one by the end of this decade. Still, moving quickly
created many injustices. In the felicitous phrase of the social theorist Ernest
Gellner, the “price of velvet”—that is, velvet, nonviolent revolutions—was that
the nomenklatura retained privileges and had a head start in
the quest for economic and political power.
The transition
exacted a significant cost on social cohesion. Workers in Poland once chanted,
“There’s no freedom without Solidarity”; by the early 2000s, the slogan had
become, “There’s no solidarity in freedom.” The Gdansk shipyard, where the
Solidarity movement had begun in 1980, went bankrupt in 1996. But freedom,
understood as some essential control over one’s everyday life, also suffered:
As Garton Ash puts it, “The locus of unfreedom moved from the state to the
workplace.” The story of freedom in Europe did not proceed in a single straight
line.
This was not the only
disillusionment: Heroes of dissident movements in Central and Eastern Europe
turned into ordinary politicians—which, in some cases, meant corrupt
politicians. Even Czechs eventually tired of such a towering figure as Vaclav
Havel (whom Garton Ash knew well); by the end, they no longer saw exemplary
courage and integrity but only, Garton Ash writes, “theatrical gestures and
moralistic preaching.”
Meanwhile, their
self-restraint gave way to the hubris of his son’s America, where the
financialization of everything and the trust in so-called self-regulating
markets rightly discredited Western versions of capitalism after the 2008
crisis and where the belief in spreading democracy through military conquest,
sorely disappointed in Iraq and Afghanistan, made Western freedom rhetoric ring
hollow. The global war on terrorism turned out to be a colossal failure of
political judgment; Garton Ash thinks Beijing should posthumously award al
Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden its highest honors for leading Washington into a
decade of “strategic distraction.”
And so the downward
turn began and, arguably, continues today. Anti-liberal populists started to
score victories across Europe. 2016 saw the greatest political defeat of Garton
Ash’s life: Brexit. Garton Ash tells a familiar story about Britain’s decision
to leave the EU, appearing contrite in the face of the supposed rebellion of
those “left behind” by liberal elites. But he also offers a more exciting
narrative—one that underlines his more significant point about the role of
individuals (and contingency) in history. Figures such as British Prime
Minister Tony Blair, he writes, did not dare to make the case for the EU to the
British people. Blair would never fail to say he was a “passionate European,”
but he would only do so in Strasbourg. As a result, arguably, it was not just
the economically deprived who voted for Brexit. Garton Ash reports that an old
friend of his voted Leave; his father, he’s sure, would have done the same.
Today, the British are paying the price for a failure of politicians—and intellectuals—to
transform people’s mental map of where Britain truly belongs.
For updates click hompage here