By Eric Vandenbroeck
and co-workers
Europe's Energy Crisis Could Last for
Years
The Ukrainian Energy
Ministry has announced that it'll pause Ukraine's energy exports to the
European Union starting on October 11. This is due to the Russian shelling
of Ukraine's energy infrastructure and many of its power plants.
The Ukrainian Energy
Minister German Galushchenko explained that this is a
necessary decision:
Today's missile
strikes, which hit thermal generation and electrical substations, forced
Ukraine to halt the export of electricity beginning on October 11, 2022, to
stabilize its energy system.
Ukraine has been
exporting electricity to the EU and has dedicated lines for energy supply to
Poland and Moldova. The Energy Ministry attributes the missile strikes to
Russia's aim of disrupting these exports to Europe.
Europe's Generational Energy Crisis
At the end of July,
Russia reduced gas flows to Europe via the Nord Stream 1 pipeline to 20%
capacity. Further restrictions in supply are likely, injecting great
uncertainty into the outlook for the region. The weaponization of gas
deliveries has already resulted in energy shortages and high prices and will
cause an economic
downturn in Europe this winter.
Europe is facing a
generational energy crisis as it heads into winter. A shortfall of 150
billion cubic meters of gas—gas that Russia won't deliver
to Europe this year because of its war in Ukraine—has left Europe scrambling to
find alternatives and contain the fallout. Gas prices in Europe are now about
eight times the average of the past ten years—and about eight times more
expensive than prices in the United States. Governments are appealing to the
public to reduce their gas usage while also trying to ensure consumers and
businesses can afford to pay their gas and electricity bills at all—all the
while preparing for the worst-case scenarios, ranging from periodic blackouts
to cascades of industrial bankruptcies.
Can Europe afford to
keep its businesses and citizens warm and safe through this winter? Does the
energy crisis mean an end to Europe's climate policy goals?
But it would be not
very smart to assume that it will be short and that it will be over next year.
Barring something unforeseen, like a Russian collapse or some extraordinary
deal with OPEC, there's no reason to think the situation will not get
progressively more difficult. Because the crucial thing is that this year
because Europe was slow to move aggressively against Russia, they were able to
fill up the gas storage tanks. I mean, if Europe were to experience a severe
winter this year, and there is some meteorological evidence suggesting that we
might be headed into that, there will likely be major shortages already this
winter. But indeed, next year, all bets are off, really—it's not obvious where
the replenishment of the stocks will come from next year. Over a time horizon
of two to three to four years, with some of the investment in floating LNG
[liquefied natural gas] terminals, major economies will begin to feed through
and make the balance easier to strike. There's a sense that this year is
nerve-wracking. Next year looks like it will be the most challenging period. And then, beyond that,
the situation eases again.
But
suppose Europe is at once to reduce its import deficit of gas
substantially. In that case, all it needs to do is turn the thermostats down
from an average of 22 degrees centigrade [71.6 degrees Fahrenheit] to 19
degrees centigrade [66.2 degrees], which would hugely slice and cut back on its
import dependence.
Ukraine Proposes A New Security Pact With NATO
The Ukrainian
government has teamed up with a former NATO chief to propose a new security
pact between Western governments and Ukraine modeled after the U.S. government's
relationship with Israel. Former NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen
traveled to Washington last week to lay the groundwork for pitching the plan to
the United States and other prominent Western allies.
Rasmussen
characterized the pact as essentially a formal codification of Western support
already extended to Ukraine since the invasion began in February. Rasmussen has
worked with Andriy Yermak, Zelensky's chief of staff,
on the proposal since May and this month began formally pitching the plan to
NATO governments, starting in Washington.
Rasmussen drew
comparisons between the proposed security compact and U.S. security cooperation
with Israel—countries that consider themselves close military and political
allies with layers of bilateral defense cooperation and mutual defense
agreements that do not have a formal defense treaty. "We studied different
models of security guarantees, including Taiwan, Israel, historical security
guarantees, etc.," Rasmussen said. "This one is close to what you
have seen between the U.S. and Israel."
Former U.S. officials
and European diplomats who have reviewed the compact acknowledged the need to
address the thorny question of sustaining Western support for Ukraine for the
long haul but were divided as to whether the document would successfully be
able to fill that gap.
"I appreciate
what they're trying to do," said Jim Townsend, who served as U.S. deputy
assistant secretary of defense for Europe and NATO during the Obama
administration. He cautioned that being too ambitious with the pact could
undermine efforts to get it off the ground altogether. "It's the perfect
being the enemy of the good."
With U.S. military
aid to Ukraine dwarfing that provided by other countries, Rasmussen
acknowledged that the plan hinged on U.S. support. "Without active support
from the U.S., this is just theory," he said. Between January and early
August, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy's Ukraine
Support Tracker,
Washington pledged more than $24 billion in military aid—more than
six times that of the second-biggest donor, the United Kingdom.
Rasmussen
characterized the proposed security pact as part of a long-term answer to the
West's long-standing challenge with Russia rather than as an act of charity to
Ukraine as Washington tries to pivot more resources to geopolitical competition
with China. "If we get this right, the security guarantees to Ukraine
could fix the Russia problem because it is in the interest of the U.S. to have
a strong and stable Eastern European partner as a bulwark against Russian
attacks."
For updates click hompage here