In its heyday in the
1980s, the Shining Path was the most formidable rebel movement in Latin
America, waging a brutal war with the Peruvian state. Not only did the Maoist
group control large areas of the countryside but it also struck at targets in
the capital, Lima, prompting fears it could eventually take over the country.
Recently then it sprung back from relative obscurity to launch its most deadly
attacks in more than a decade.
The previous time the
founder of the Shining Path was in the news was when he married.
The early 1960s
however one should say, was a period characterized by broad-based poverty
exacerbated by double-digit inflation in Peru. By the end of the decade, the
military government of General Juan Velasco announced a sweeping new national
land reform policy in response to the continued economic difficulty. Under this
plan, much of the lands in the rural regions of the country would be seized and
redistributed to the peasants in the form of communal ownership. (M.Tammen, Drug War vs. Land Reform in Peru, USA Today
Magazine, Vol. 120, No. 2560, January
1992, p.50).
The goal of the
policy was to transfer land control from the predominately White, rural
economic elites-the owners of the haciendas-into the hands of the predominately
indigenous peasants. Nonetheless, the plan was ill-conceived and encountered
serious problems from the very beginning. The reforms were slow to take shape
and were not as comprehensive as the problems of the nation required. At the
time of the termination of the program in 1976, only about seven million
hectares of the total nineteen million subject to expropriation by the
government had been placed into the hands of peasant families. And, by 1979,
only 13 percent of the rural lands of Peru were actually under the control of
the peasants. Most of the land remained under the control of the state itself.
This created disillusionment and in some instances indignation in many of the
rural peasant communities. It led many to believe that even a government
seemingly sympathetic to their economic plight could not be trusted. Rather
than rely on a top-down approach to reform, many believed that it was time to
take action at the grass roots level.
In addition to the
problems in the rural regions, the national government's fiscal condition grew
worse in the 1970s. By 1978, the Peruvian national treasury was almost bankrupt
and the nation was unable to pay the service on its foreign debt obligations.
As a result, inflation of Peru 's currency became a persistent, frightening
problem throughout d1e 1980s. From the difficult level of 60 percent in 1980,
inflation accelerated. In 1984, the rate was 100 percent. In 1988 it had soared
to a rate of 1,722 percent, 2,600 percent in 1989, and 7,650 percent in 1990.
As a result, the nation's financial markets were in chaos; the Gross National
Product declined and real wages nose-dived.
In addition to
economic catastrophe, the people were forced to cope with the government's
reduced ability to care for the needs of its citizens. Healthcare and other
social services declined significantly. The availability of clean drinking
water and adequate waste facilities deteriorated to the point that "an
estimated forty percent of Lima 's mushrooming population and approximately
seventy-five percent of Peru 's rural population did not enjoy access to clean
water or sewage.” (Cynthia McClintock, Revolutionary Movements in Latin
America, 1998, p.193).
Many people during
this period, particularly in the rural regions such as Ayacucho, came to
believe that they completely lacked sociopolitical mobility, as well as the
basic necessities of life and d1at no remedy was in sight. Indeed, conditions
continued to worsen. For the peasantry, even relying on the legitimate
political and legal system, as they had for so many years, no longer appeared
to be a viable option.
For those that had
done so, attending the university and receiving a formal education had provided
them with very little-jobs were not forthcoming and their status had not
changed. In most cases they returned to their own villages after graduation in
order to become relatively low-paid teachers. Nonetheless, their education had
opened their eyes to their relative deprivation and acted as an agent of
mobilization for action. Life in urban areas was no better. Unemployment and
underemployment rates remained high. Those that had migrated to the cities
often found themselves in a worse situation than they had left. Many people
lived in growing urban shantytowns and, in contrast to life in the country, had
no way to grow their own crops for food. In fact these conditions, set the
stage for the rise of an indigenous movement that could offer the people hope,
while at the same time taking care of pressing human service needs as much as
possible. The Shining Path/ Sendero Luminoso (hence called Sendero for that is
what they are called in their country in Peru) first began to organize grass
roots support for their movement in 1973. Their initial step was the creation
of the organizmos generados
or party-generated organisms. These were characterized as "natural
movements generated by the proletariat in the different organizational fronts.
(D.Poole and G.Renique,
Peru: Time of Fear, 1992, p. 40).
A variety of organizmos generados came into
being including the Popular Women's Movement (MFP), the Poor Peasants' Movement
(MCP), the Class Workers' and Laborers Movement (MOTC), d1e Popular
Intellectual Movement (MCP), and the Neighborhood Class Movement (MCB).
Beginning in the 1970s, in the region surrounding Ayacucho, Sendero workers
began the process of establishing and maintaining the notion of the popular
school. These grass roots institutions, directed at the poorest strata of the
Peruvian population, sought to overcome the inadequacies of the state schools
and bring education to all of the people. By the 1980s, the popular school
concept had expanded to a national campaign. In 1979, Sendero also established
a military school in order to train cadres to lead the armed struggle. The
purpose of the school was to continue the training process and prepare guerilla
fighters in military tactics. (See Gaociela
Tarazona-Sevillano and John B. Reuter. Sendero Luminoso and the Threat of
Narcoterrorism, 1990).
In addition to
functions that promoted overt party goals, these organizations also provided
services for Sendero members. For example, Popular Aid of Peru, founded in
1982, consisted of several smaller aid groups that offered medical, legal,
transportation, food, and housing assistance to Sendero adherents. Rather than
a rigid structure, the organization of Sendero Luminoso was quite fluid,
allowing its adherents to rise to higher and more responsible levels as they
proved themselves to be worthy. As they gained positions of higher authority
they received additional party indoctrination. As a result, by the time an
individual reached the top echelons of party hierarchy they were fully
committed to its cause and methods. In addition to its primary hierarchy, the
party structure contained intermediate and ancillary support organizations that
helped the movement run smoothly. These were designed to assist the party
leadership in coordinating and supporting regional committees. These included
the Department for Organizational Support, the Group of Popular Support,
the Department of Finance, and the Departmcnt of
International Relations. Many Sendero members claimed that socioeconomic misery
drove them to join the movement. Others claimed that government duplicity and
incompetence were important reasons. In short, they saw society as corrupt.
Nonetheless, these were not the only variables at work in the movement's
membership and mobilization. (McClintock, Revolutionary Movements in Latin
America, 273).
For many, the
problems of Peru stemmed from a society dominated by people who were perceived
by the Indians as foreigners in their own land. They were convinced that if
this dominant and seemingly "foreign" class of elites could be
removed from the positions of power in Peruvian society, the country's problems
would be much closer to being solved. The movement perceived of violence and
terror as agents of rebirth and renewal. As Abimael Guzman himself asserted:
Revolution will find
its nest in our homeland; we will make sure of it ... the people's war will
grow everyday until the old order is pulled down, the
world is entering a new era; the strategic offensive of world revolution. This
is of transcendental importance ... The people rear up, arm themselves, and
rise in revolution to put the noose around the neck of imperialism and the
reactionaries, seizing them by the throat and garroting them. The trumpets
begin to sound, the roar of the masses grows, and will continue to grow, it
will deafen us, it will take us into a powerful vortex ... there will he a great rupture and we will be the makers of a
definitive dawn. We will convert the black fire into red and the red into
light. This we shall do, this is the rebirth. Comrades we are reborn. (Quoted
in G. Gorriti, The Shining Path, 1990,34-35).
The symbolism here is
clear: conflict, dark, light, death, sacred intervention, destiny, rebirth,
paradise. The war that the Shining Path found itself engaged in was to be the
most significant in the history of Peru. It was of transcendental importance, and
would result in the solution of all problems that now faced society. Sendero
military operations were well organized and purposeful. In their methods, for
example, they followed a well-disciplined plan of five steps that came to
constitute an effective tactical policy. Step one required a decision by party
leadership on a specific plan of action before its execution. The second
involved an assessment of the physical and manpower assets that were needed to
complete the operations and guarantee its success. The third and fourth steps
involved thorough preparation and the actual carrying out of the plan.
Operations could take one of many different forms: street protests,
recruitment, disruption of daily life in the country-such as destruction of
power plants or a physical attack on individuals or other groups--confiscating
agricultural harvests in the rural regions to meet the needs of the party, and
armed confrontation with agents of the state structure, for example, the Civil
Guard or the Republican Guard. The fifth step called for an after-action report
that involved a detailed analysis of the action. This report was forwarded to
party leadership where it was utilized in the formulations and preparation of
new party action. (Ibid.65.)
Between 1980 and
1993, it is estimated, that the war carried out by Sendero resulted in the
deaths of about 30,000. ("Flickers from the Past: How Big a Threat Is the
Shining Path?" The Economist, Vol. 368, No. 8333, July 19, 2003, p.28).
For a background
understanding of the Shining Path one should among others know that despite the
theoretical liberalism of the new Peruvian constitution and the practical
necessities of the development of a modern market-based economy,
postcolonialism in the region created little more than a revamping of the
previous antiquated and inefficient feudal system. This system served
the-exclusive needs of and was dominated by Creole Peruvians, particularly the
old land -owning families of the colonial period. As a result, many indigenous
inhabitants of the new state did not perceive that what had happened in
throwing off the yoke of Spanish imperialism was of value to them at all. The
burdens that they had known throughout the colonial era would continue with little
improvement.
In the early
nineteenth century, a modest peasant movement in the village of Huancavelica
asked to embrace the figure of Santiago, the patron saint of the community.
They believed that Santiago would usher in a new, more prosperous age.
According to contemporary accounts:
Santiago told the
Indians that if they followed him, he would lead them in a return to the past
in which there would be produce in abundance and no one would die of hunger.
(Quoted in David D. Gow, "The Roles of Christ and Inkarri
in Andean Religion," Journal of Latin American Lore, Vol. 6, 1980,283).
Beginning in the early twentieth century, Peru began to move increasingly into
the mainstream of international life in the western hemisphere. Largely as the
result of British and American investment in copper mining, cotton and sugar
production, a growing network of railroads, and hastened by the opening of the
Panama Canal in 1914, Peru became increasingly integrated into a growing modern
world economy. Nonetheless, this rapid economic change, in turn, roused
unexpected social and political turbulence. (Frederick Pike, The Politics of
the Miraculous in Peru: Haya de la Torre and the Spiritualist Tradition ,
1986,14).
To many Peruvians,
especially among those in the middle and lower classes the vast majority of the
population-life became increasingly confusing and unpredictable. There was a
persistent anxiety over their diminishing socioeconomic and political status within
a society that was undergoing profound change.
For example, between
1920 and 1973 the population of Peru more than tripled. (The population of Peru
in 1920 was 4.828 million and in 1973 it was 14.628 million. Population
Statistics, University of Utrecht, available at
www.library.uu.nl/wesp/populstatjamericas/peru.htm).
Yet, during this same
period, many traditional Indian communities in the rural regions of Peru were
destroyed in order to make land available for modern industrial and mining use.
The combination of these two variables-rapid population growth and the redirection
of traditional lands-forced large numbers of the peasant Indian class to
forsake their traditional village life and move to new mining, industrial, or
agricultural centers or to the larger, urbanized areas closer to the coast.
Traditional kinship relationships were disrupted. In addition, many Indians
found themselves victimized by an alienating world that increased their
awareness and exposure to racism, relative deprivation, and sociopolitical
discrimination at the hands of the minority, yet powerful, non-Indian elite
class. Many members of the peasant class found themselves to be isolated,
culturally estranged, and marginalized from an increasingly prosperous center
of Peruvian life. As a result, Peru was accumulating an under mass made up of people
partially adrift, no longer fully integrated into community or manorial life.
Also racism has been a persistent problem in the history of Latin America and
this is no less true in Peru. Given the socioeconomic gap between the so called
races, perhaps not surprisingly, the Indian communities came to fear the
process of modernity. (See Fiona Wilson, "Indians and Mestizos:
Identity and Urban Popular Culture in Andean Peru," Journal of Southern
African Studies, Vol. 26, No.2, June 2000).
The Criollos
(Peruvians of White, European ancestry) perceive of the majority Native
American population as an inferior race to be relegated, automatically, to a
lower socioeconomic status. The result is a massive chasm between upper class
Whites and lower-class Indians. The process of economic development beginning
in the early twentieth century exacerbated this problem. By the 1960s, as the
economy of Peru continued to get bigger, class differences worsened as the
uneven growth expanded the know that twentieth-century Radicalism
in Peru was closely identified with the indigenismo movement, among primarily
coastal Peruvian intellectuals, seeking to address the grievances and alleviate
the deplorable conditions of the Indian population. Here, intellectuals on both
the Left and the Right began to speak of the need to break the back of the
Peruvian oligarchy and Western imperialism that seemingly now dominated the
life of the country. Of particular importance were the writings of Carlos Mariategui. His efforts ultimately led to the formation of
the Communist Party of Peru (PCP) in the 1930s.
Twentieth-century
radicalism in Peru was closely identified with the indigenismo movement among
primarily coastal Peruvian intellectuals seeking to address the grievances and
alleviate the deplorable conditions of the Indian population. Also Mariategui was deeply distrustful of the traditional
political process in Peru and, probably as a result, never worked out a
broad-based ideology grounded in Western-style Leftist thought. Rather, his
Marxism was based on the reality of the experience of the Peruvian indigenous
peasant and the urban poor. In his most significant work, Seven Interpretive
Essays on Peruvian Reality, he argued that all of Peru 's problems of class,
poverty, race, and social conflict could be traced to two factors: a semifeudal
economic system and neocolonialism. Peruvian unity is still to be accomplished
... what has to be solved is a dualism of race, language and sentiment born of
the invasion and COI1quest of indigenous Peru by a race that has not managed to
merge with the Indian race, eliminate it, or absorb it. (J.C. Mariategui, Seven Interpretive Essays, University of
Texas,1971, p. 164).
In recent years,
religious movements have emerged in the Andean region that carry on the
millenarian traditions of the past. The congregation of Jehovah or the Mision Israelita del Nuevo Pacto Universal del Peru (Israelite Mission of the New
Universal Pact) believe that their founder, Ezequiel Ataucusi
Gamonal, is a prophet and son of God. Created in
1955, the movement now claims a following of over three million. Gamonal preached that the world would end before the year
2000 and that all who joined the congregation must strictly follow his
teachings. The organization's headquarters is located near the city of Huarochiri. Los Israelitas, as it
is commonly known, possesses symbols and theology uniquely crafted from both
Judeo-Christian and pre-Columbian Indian sources.
Nonetheless it
appears to be "explicitly Peruvian and implicitly Andean in its use of
symbols and sacrifice." As new members join the movement they must submit
to rigorous indoctrination that informs them "of the absolute literal
truth contained within the Old Testament." Nonetheless, the message of the
death and resurrection of Jesus Christ is entirely omitted from their
teachings. Rather than a worship of Christ, Israelitas
worship Israel as the "personified place of the Old Testament."
(Sarah Lund Skar, Lives Together, Scandinavian University Press, 1994, p. 246).
In the 1970s, a
wandering preacher and visionary named Jose Francisco da Cruz, a Brazilian by
birth, began to spread his message in the villages along the Amazon River and
its tributaries in Peru. He' declared that the destruction of the world was
imminent and on the direct instructions of Jesus Christ he was forming the
"Third Universal Reform of Christianity" to assist people in
preparing for the approaching end time. In its aftermath, the world would be
one of abundant wealth and universal peace.
Over time, da Cruz's
movement, known as the Orden Cruzada, has attracted over 10,000 followers in
Brazil and Peru. Despite its overtly Christian foundation and character, some
argue that its doctrines can be connected to the ancient Tupian search for the
"Land without Evil.” (Jaime Regan, "Mesianismo
Cocama: Un movimiento de resistencia
en la Amazonia Peruana," America Indigena, Vol. 48, 1988, p. 132).
Abimael Guzman was born in the town of Tambo, not far from the
southern Peruvian coastal city of Mollendo, on
December 3, 1934. He was the illegitimate son of a wealthy, import wholesaler.
His mother, Bernice Reynoso, lived not too far from his father's store. At the
age of five, Guzman's mother died. Eventually, he went to live with his father
in the city of Callao and it was here that he began school. Within a few years
his father moved once again to the more upscale city of Arequipa, where he and
his family lived in a large and stylish home in an expensive neighborhood.
Today, this home is a school in Arequipa, and has been named the College of the
Divine Master, in honor of Guzman. (James R. Rinehart, Revolution and the
Millennium,1997, 117-120).
At the age of nineteen,
Guzman entered the National University of San Agustin in Arequipa to study both
law and philosophy. Here, he began to cultivate a strong interest in Marxism
and in the late 1950s decided to join the Peruvian Communist Party (PCP). Then
in 1961, while completing his second doctoral theses, Guzman began to interpret
the economic and political history of the Andes in a revisionist Marxist
perspective. And concluded that all oppressed societies possess an unqualified
right to rebel against their oppressors. Following the completion of his
graduate studies, Guzman was offered the opportunity to teach at the newly
reopened University of In addition, Guzman was appointed director of Personnel
for the university, which allowed him to control the hiring and firing of
faculty and staff, dismissing those that did not support his political agenda
and ideology and replace them with those who did. Many of these individuals
would eventually form the senior leadership of Sendero Luminoso. (Gabriela
Tarazona-Sevillano and John B. Reuter, Sendero Luminoso and the Threat of
Narcoterrorism, 1990, p.6).
By 1970 he had
recruited and organized a solid base of socialist cadres. Following their
academic and ideological experience, many of these individuals returned to
their local villages as teachers. As a result they were in a position to both
influence and recruit new young people to the cause. (Gustavo Gorriti, The
Shining Path,1990, p.18).
His feelings were
deeply influenced by the recent victory of Fidel Castro and his movement in
Cuba; an event that bolstered Marxist based political parties throughout Latin
America and brought a renewed sense of urgency and meaning to their cause. But
in addition to pressures from within the region, in the early 1960s the
Communist party of Peru (PCP) became caught up in the much larger international
schism between orthodox party officials in the Soviet Union and the Maoists in
China; a split that affected national communist parties around the world.
In 1964, at the
Fourth National Party Conference of PCP, the split into two important factions.
The first was a pro-Maoist minority that formed the Bandera Roja (red flag).
Second, the pro-Soviet group chose to follow the political line that continued
to be fostered by Moscow. The pro-Chinese faction in turn, came to be convinced
that the only path to liberation from Western imperialism was to follow the
example of Mao and mobilize the peasantry throughout the rural regions and
pursue violent struggle, and became the foundation of Sendero Luminoso. (Martin
Koppel, Peru's Shining Path: Anatomy of a Reactionary Sect, 1993, p.11).
It was within this
context in the mid-1960s that Abimael Guzman began to develop a political
philosophy that eventually became known to his followers as the "Fourth
Sword." Guzman insisted that Sendero Luminoso be grounded ideologically in
a thorough and fundamental approach to the study of the classic Communist
writings of Marx, Lenin, and Mao. These were increasingly presented by the
movement as possessing a kind of scripture- like quality. Sendero ideology was
built on this firm and seemingly sacred foundation, utilizing basic principles
derived from them and then. In addition to the philosophies of Marx, Lenin, and
Mao, Guzman was deeply influenced by the ideas of Mariategui
who had asserted that "the shining path of socialism" could lead Peru
to an idealized future. Guzman began calling his new movement Sendero Luminoso,
the Shining Path. (Colin Harding, "The Rise of Sendero Luminoso," in
Rory Miller, ed., Region and Class in Modern Peruvian History, University of
Liverpool, 1987, 186).
The Sendero movement,
operating from its base in Ayacucho, was initially considered rather
inconsequential by the government of President Fernando Belaunde Terry in the
1970s and the movement was allowed to develop rather freely with little
interference from the capital. Even after Sendero violence began to emerge in
the Ayacucho province, the Belaunde government largely ignored the rebellion
for nearly two years and only dispatched small special police units to the
region in response. As a result, during the first two years of armed conflict
the Sendero movement was allowed to take almost unrestrained action. This
allowed the movement to recruit new members, train its personnel, and expand
its base of operation in a remarkably unfettered environment. In 1974, in a
bold move reflecting the rapid growth of the movement, Guzman relocated the
headquarters of Sendero to Lima itself. The move was out of organizational
necessity and a clear recognition of its growing influence. The total number of
party cells had grown rapidly and Sendero Luminoso now had strong followings at
most of the major universities in Peru.
By the early 1980s,
Sendero Luminoso began to prosecute a persistent war of terror in Ayacucho and
elsewhere. Their tactics not only included the bombing of local government
buildings and physical attacks on property owned by the private sector but,
eventually expanded to include the assassination of local politicians. In
relatively short order their activities became so dangerous that the state
police were forced to leave the area. A more general violence ensued following
a daring raid and jailbreak from the Ayacucho prison in March 1982. (Strong,
Shining Path, 22).
By December 1982, the
escalation of violence, bombings, and power blackouts resulting from Sendero
attacks on power stations forced the government to declare a state of emergency
across five provinces; an expansive area encompassing roughly 60 percent of the
population of Peru. In early 1983, the state launched a counterinsurgency
campaign that was both abusive and brutal. Sendero responded in 1984 with a new
offensive that was even more violent than past operations. The government
declared a state of emergency and suspended constitutional rights in the area
encompassed by the "emergency zone." As a result, Sendero Luminoso
really came into its own in the early 1980s within a background of rapid
sociopolitical and economic change and profound crisis in Peru.
Guzman and his
colleagues worked diligently to craft an ideology that successfully merged the
millenarian stream of the Inca past with the dialectic of Marxism. Nonetheless,
Guzman's conscientious and meticulous manipulation of Indian traditions was
subtle. At the same time, his supporters were quite aware of the syncretic
mixture that he had created and were comfortable with it. One poetic
interpretation of the "people's war" declared:
Thousands of Indians
and Mestizos Descend to the town Like a red avalanche With muscles of steel And
voices of thunder, shouting "freedom'" Because they know that the
days of Pachacutec And the Inkarri
have arrived. (Quoted in Strong, ShiningPath, 61).
Sendero forces, when
crying out acts of violence against the state, purposely utilized the widely
known Inkarri myth of Indian resurrection. In
addition, in 1980, they chose to openly celebrate the one hundred and
ninety-ninth anniversary of the execution Gose
Gabriel Condorcanqui, Tupac Amaru II. This was a
highly symbolic action and afterward, one can clearly discern that consistent
and meaningful elements of Quechua Indian culture and ritual pervaded the
Shining Path and significantly influenced their activities.
Guzman viewed Sendero
at the forefront of a revolutiorr, which, he
believed, would accompany "humanity's third millennium." In a speech
entitled "For the New Flag" delivered at a Sendero conference in
1979, Guzman divided Peruvian history into three important epochs. First, he
referred to "how darkness prevailed," a clear reference to the
colonial period. Second, he asserted, was an age that explained "how light
emerged and steel was forged." Finally, he concluded with "how the
walls were destroyed and the dawn spread." These three epochs were
designed to purposely coincide wim me transformation
in the colonial period of the initial five ages of the Andean world. According
to traditional Indian myth, each of these five ages lasted 1,000 years and was
made up of two distinct halves. By the time of Juan Santos Atahualpa, the five
ages had been cut to three-the age of the Father, the age of the Son, and the
age of the Holy Ghost. It was in this third age that the separation between the
Indian and European worlds would be reestablished. (See Stefano Varese, The
Ethnopolitics of Indian Resistance in Latin America, in Latin Latin American Perspectives Vol. 23, No.2, Spring 1996,
58-7).
Sendero Luminoso
furthermore utilized symbolism to enhance Abimael Guzman's image as a savior of
the people.51 For example, many of Guzman's closest advisors were known as the
"holy family." (Poole and Renique, Peru:
Time of Fear, 43. See also, Gorriti, The Shining Path, 25).
This appeared to
indicate the stature possessed by Guzman and how simply being linked to him
could somehow raise the status of mortal men to that of the near sacred. As the
perceived "father of a new age in Peru" Guzman was portrayed as a "bright,
soaring flame, burning with ideological passion and power."
(Tarazona-Sevillano and Reuter, Sendero Luminoso, 22).
The literature of the
Sendero Luminoso was dotted with messianic references designed to strengthen
the belief that they were leading the people to a new age. Sprinkled throughout
is a significant sense of determinism and inevitability that they were destined
to ultimately prevail. "Our people know consciously and completely that
the wheel of history cannot be declined, that's why they continue to struggle
heroically alongside the PCP striving for a new dawn to come."
("Statement of the Political Prisoners and War Prisoners of Peru,"
translated by Peru's People's Movement, The New Flag, The People's War in
Peru.)
Biblical references
often :lppeJred in party pamplets
circulated around Ayacucho. In particular, these glorified the image and symbol
of Guzman, asserting, "we are communists as your image and as your simile
... fortunate the eyes that see you, fortunate d1e eyes that heat you." In
this way, Guzman's role as a god-like figure was embellished and "the
principles of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism were internalized as dogmas."
(Jefrey Gamarra, Conflict, Post-Conflict and Religion: Andean Responses to New
Religious Movements." Journal of Southern African Studies Vol. 26, No.2,
June 2000, 271-287).
In an interview with
EI Diario, Guzman asserted, we believe that
bureaucratic capitalism has entered into a general crisis. Moreover, we believe
that this bureaucratic capitalism was born sick, because it derived from semi
feudalism (or is tied to it) and from imperialism. What kind of child could
come from these two parents condemned to death by incurable disease? A sick,
stunted monster that has entered its phase of destruction. We believe that the
crises will become sharper and sharper, even as some economists say, there have
been more or less thirty years of crisis from which we have not emerged except
for some small ripples of recovery. We can see that each new crisis is worse
than the previous one. And if we add to this the two critical decades of the
80s and 90s, back-to back, the situation becomes clear. (El Diario
Interview with Chairman Gonzolo, 57-58). Thus,
according to Guzman, the only hope of situation for the Peruvian masses is to
completely destroy liberal democratic capitalism and build a socialist state
and a reframed Indian identity on tap of the ashes. Indeed, they assert, such a
scenario is inevitable.
On April 5, 1992,
President Alberto Fujimori’s administration staged a coup that led to the
dissolution of Peru’s Congress and the dismantling of the country’s legal
system. After the coup, Fujimori took over the country’s media organizations
and almost all its other free institutions, promising that a return to
democracy would occur within the year. The accumulation of near absolute power
in the hands of the president and his coterie precipitated a campaign of murder
and abduction against those thought to be enemies of the state, without having
any legal system capable of challenging them. Under these new laws, Lima’s
security forces are thought to have vastly increased a campaign of violence
against Peruvians thought to be sympathetic to, or part of, Shining Path. The
United States was alarmed at the turn of events and withdrew all government aid
other than humanitarian assistance, but didn’t permanently sever ties with
Peru.
On September 12,
1992, Abimael Guzmán, the head of Shining Path, was captured and imprisoned,
destroying the group’s chain of command. After this, the insurgency quieted
down and assassinations and attacks decreased. A few years after his capture,
Guzmán called for a peace deal, which caused the remaining insurgents to split
into two groups-one that insisted on continuing to fight and another that
wanted to put down its weapons.
Resurgence of Shining Path
Recent information
suggests that Shining Path has staged a moderate resurgence in the mountainous
regions of Peru. Some Peruvian officials suspect that the remnants of the
Maoist Shining Path have turned to cocaine production to fund their operations,
which includes their campaign to overthrow the Peruvian government. The U.S
Department of State continues to classify Shining Path as a terrorist
organization in its most recent Country Reports on Terrorism. “This makes
Sendero Luminoso a multi-edged weapon aimed at not only Peruvian national
security, but that of Latin America and the United States as well,” writes
Frank Hyland, CEO of S&F Enterprises and a man who has been involved with
counterterrorism for over twenty-five years. “Without even pulling a trigger,
Sendero Luminoso continues to contribute to the multi-billion dollar annual
drain on the U.S. economy,” he writes.
The reformed Shining
Path has managed to inflict minor damage on Peru’s military and police force.
In December 2006, Shining Path killed five Peruvian police officers and two
workers from the National Coca Company. Shining Path has easily gained ground in
the country due to indifference or outright apathy on the part of the
peasantry, writes Hyland.
Currently the head of
the rebel group, known as Comrade Artemio, is the only high-profile Shining
Path leader who has not been caught or killed. On March 25, 2008, Shining Path
members working with drug traffickers killed a police officer and wounded eleven
on an anti-drug patrol. The unit is said to have been lead
by Comrade Artemio. Artemio has stated that even though the Shining Path hasn’t
been very active since the 1992 capture of Guzmán, who received a life sentence
in October 2006, they are rising again and intend to grow and work in secrecy.
However, Guerrilla
movements predicated on controlling a population through terror rarely succeed
in the long term.
For updates
click homepage here