In contrast to their frequent squabbling
over Indochina, American and British leaders gave little attention to Korea during
the war. As Japan's conflict in China broadened into a world war, the pressures
and demands on Koreans increased. About two and a half million Koreans were
recruited or conscripted for work in Japan, often working in Japanese mines and
factories under conditions that amounted to virtual slave labor. Three hundred
fifty thousand Koreans served in the Japanese military or in its auxiliaries
and support services, and one hundred fifty thousand died. Korean women were
tricked or kidnapped into the Japanese system of military prostitution; they
were often referred to as "comfort women." Young women from all areas
under Japanese control were coerced into this network of sexual slavery, but
the largest proportion, an estimated fifty thousand to two hundred thousand,
were Koreans. (SIGEX Kandy to Director of Operations, X-2 R&A, National
Archives Record Group 226, entry 58, box 3.)
By late August, word had reached Seoul
that U.S. troops would occupy the southern half of the country. The news
brought feelings of relief to the Japanese and motivated the independence
committee, which moved quickly to establish a de facto government that could be
in place when the Americans arrived. September 6 saw the formation of the
Korean People's Republic with a long list of Cabinet members representing a
wide spectrum of political leaders, including many prominent exiles who were
unaware that they had been nominated. Although the People's Republic was
designed to look like a government of national unity, it was in fact dominated
by two factions, Yo Un-hyong's
Korean Independence League and the Communists, whose dominant faction was
headed by Pak Hon-yong.
In a nation where even the Communists
had feuding factions, it was no surprise that the Korean People's Republic soon
found itself confronted by a rival coalition, formed a week later. This was the
Democratic Party, led by well-to-do professionals, businessmen, and landowners,
many of them educated in American or Japanese universities. Some were patriots
who had spent their share of time in Japanese prisons, but others were tainted
with suspicion-or more than suspicion-of having collaborated with the colonial
authorities. The leaders of the Democratic Party saw Yo
Un-hyong as an opportunist who had sold out to both
the Japanese and the Communists. Mostly members of the affluent classes, they
naturally resisted the more radical reforms called for by the Korean People's
Republic. Had the Koreans been left to determine their own future, they might
have found a basis for unity and independence, or they might have become
embroiled in civil war. But the forces of the world's two most powerful
countries were arriving on the peninsula. The fate of Korea was now entangled
in the exigencies of Great Power rivalries, as it had been so often in the
past.
On August 20, a platoon of Russian
soldiers with a lone Soviet tank entered the old fortress town of Kapsan on the Korea-Manchuria border. The Kapsan People's Committee had organized a welcoming
ceremony with an honor guard of the local Chiandae
and citizens lining the streets waving homemade red flags. One old man waved a
tattered copy of Das Kapital and was hoisted up to the tank. The Soviet
soldiers, appreciative of their reception, passed out loaves of black bread
that one Korean found "tough enough to be used as pillows but tasty."
(Peter Worthing, Occupation and Revolution,Berleley,
2001, p. 70.)
The Russian platoon belonged to a division of the Twenty-fifth Army, which had
attacked the Japanese forces in northern Korea on August 10. The outnumbered
and outmaneuvered Japanese surrendered five days later. On the twenty-fourth,
the Soviets reached Pyongyang, the largest city north of the 38th parallel,
where they were welcomed by cheering crowds and bottles ofliberated
Japanese liquor. (Memo for Record by General Gallagher, 21 September 1945,
Philip E. Gallagher Papers, U.S. Army Military History Institute, Carlisle,
Pa.)
The Koreans soon discovered that the
soldiers of the Twenty-fifth Army, like their counterparts in Manchuria, seemed
to have left any sense of self-restraint far behind them in the Soviet Union.
Indiscriminate looting, rape, and robbery began almost immediately. The town of
Songdo, which was occupied by the Soviets for only days because it was below
the parallel, had eight million yen taken from the bank and sixty thousand
pounds of expensive, highly prized ginseng lifted from local warehouses. As a
souvenir of their stay, the soldiers also relieved most of the citizens of
their wristwatches. (Report of Arthur Hale, November 1945, enclosure 2,
Gallagher to Bernard.)
In the larger towns north of the
parallel, the conduct of the Soviets was such that Korean women began
disguising themselves as men. An Australian who visited Pyongyang to help in
the recovery of Allied POWs reported, "The Russians, armed with tommy-guns,
fire a few shots in the air, then break into the house, drag out what women
(mostly young girls) they can find, put them into the truck along with
furniture and any other objects that caught their eyes and drive off to their
barracks. After a day or two the girls are thrown on the street." (A.L.
Patti, Why Vietnam?,Berkeley, 1980, p.285.) Even in
1947, long after Soviet generals had cracked down on their troops' worst
abuses, a single province in the north experienced seven murders, one assault,
two rapes, and five robberies during one month, according to Soviet Army statistics.
(William J. Duiker,Ho Chi Minh,New
York, 2000, pp. 313-14. )
Those statistics may safely be assumed
to represent only a fraction of those types of offenses, since in the Russian
Army, as in many armies, most such crimes went unreported.
Despite the behavior of their troops,
which soon prompted an order from the high command that soldiers at night must
travel in groups of three for safety, the advent of the Russians was far from
completely unwelcome in the north. Land rents were drastically reduced, and
over the next few months land formerly owned by Japanese or absentee landlords
was confiscated and distributed to former tenants or other landless farmers.
Many larger landowners fled to the south. Those who remained were permitted to
retain only as much land as they could cultivate themselves. Japanese troops
were quickly disarmed and sent north to prisoner of war camps. Japanese
officials, police, and bureaucrats promptly found themselves out of a job. Most
soon joined the streams of thousands of other Japanese refugees headed for the
port of Wonsan or to southern Korea.
After a few years, as the Cold War
hardened and the division of the peninsula evolved into a permanent condition,
many Americans and their allies came to see Soviet actions in Korea as a
product of a carefully developed plan to bring about the sovietization
of the north, a region where the Korean Communist presence was weak to
nonexistent. (Most of the real fire-breathing Communists were in the south,
while the north was a stronghold of the nationalist right, the Christians, and
indigenous socioreligious movements.)
Actually, Soviet actions in the north
were driven by no guiding plan, nor was any needed. Soviet officers knew only
one political and social system, and they had been assured since early
childhood that Russian style Communism represented a scientific blueprint for
human progress. The Soviets kept the local People's Committees in place but
brought them firmly under control. In Pyongyang they retained the Provisional
People's Political Committee, headed by Cho Man-sik,
a widely respected Christian nationalist. A graduate of Meiji University in
Japan, Cho was sixty-three years old in 1945 and had been active in nationalist
causes since the 1920s. He had become particularly famous during the war years
for publicly refusing to comply with the Japanese order that all Koreans adopt
Japanese names.
While the soviets went about their
task of assuring a friendly political regime in northern Korea, Japanese and
Koreans below the 38th parallel uneasily awaited the arrival of the Americans.
The Japanese were having second thoughts about having granted such wide
latitude to the nationalists, and they reinforced their well-armed police with
detachments from the army. Either ignorant of or ignoring the fact that Japan
had surrendered unconditionally, Japanese officials in Korea insisted that the
future of Korea would be decided at a coming "peace conference" with
the Allies. Endo, speaking for the governor-general, explained, "The
Japanese sovereign power in Korea still majestically exists ... in a sense only
hostilities have ceased. The matters about Korea will be decided only after the
treaty has been signed." (Memo, Major George C. Sharp to Colonel G. Edward
Buxton, Captain Albert Peter Dewey, 28 December 1943, National Archives Record
Group 226, microfilm 1642, reel 73.)
The U.S. Army's XXIV Corps, which had
fought in the bloody campaign of Okinawa, was designated by MacArthur as the
occupation force for Korea. Like the Marines on Okinawa, the soldiers of the
XXIV Corps' three divisions had been expecting an early return to the United
States now that the war had ended. Instead they got Korea. While even the
newest Marine in Tsingtao, Tientsin, or Peking had consumed an ample stew of
fact, sea stories, and half-remembered history about China before he embarked
from Okinawa, there was nothing of the sort about Korea-no gossip, no rumors,
no colorful or bloodcurdling stories. Nothing. Almost no one in the army spoke
Korean except for a handful of Americans of Korean descent and the sons of
missionary families. Thousands of soldiers had been trained in Japanese at the
U.S. Army Military Government School in Charlottesville, Virginia, but
"policy prohibited the study of Korean in Army schools." (Ronald
Spector, Advice and Support, New York, 1985, p.6.)
The XXIV Corps had almost no
intelligence on Korea. Aerial reconnaissance missions were flown over the
peninsula and Koreans captured with the Japanese Army were interrogated, but
with "little result." (Wickes, "Saigon 1945-Hanoi 1946.")
Donald MacDonald, a graduate of the Military Government School, where he had
been trained in intensive Japanese, arrived at Inchon aboard a troopship.
"On the way a few of us dug out of the ship's library a book entitled
'Terry's 1905 Japanese Empire' which had a few pages on Korea .... We copied
that on the ship's typewriter and then mimeographed it. That was the total of
our knowledge about Korea when we arrived at Inchon." (Peter M. Dunn,
First Vietnam War; New York, 1985, p. 154.)
The American entry into Seoul was made
in silence. Heavily armed Japanese police lined the principal streets, and
those Koreans who dared turn out for the American arrival were prudently quiet.
That afternoon, however, as General Hodge and Admiral Thomas C. Kincaid,
commander of the Seventh Fleet, drove through Seoul on their way to accept the
Japanese surrender, the previously silent Koreans broke into wild cheering. The
surrender ceremony was held in the capitol building, in a chamber that had been
used as a throne room for the emperor of Japan on imperial visits to Korea.
That evening, Koreans danced and celebrated in the streets.
Korean exuberance was soon cut short by
Hodge's announcement at a news conference that, for the present, the Japanese
Government General would continue to function under American supervision and
that all of its personnel from Governor-General Abe to the lowest ranking
policeman would remain in their jobs. This declaration, which surprised even
the Japanese, unleashed a blast of criticism in the media. Editorial writers in
U.S. papers reacted to Hodge's announcement in the same manner as Lieutenant
Bliss's soldiers had to the sight of the bayonet-wielding Japanese sentries at
Inchon, although they used less colorful language. Koreans took to the streets
in protest. The Seoul Times commented that Koreans would rather be ruled by
"some chief from Borneo" than by the Government General. (Bruce
Cumings, Origins of the Korean War, Princeton, 1981, p. 136.)
The State Department quickly disavowed
any responsibility for leaving the Japanese in control, explaining to the press
that it was a local decision of the theater commander. In fact, State
Department planning documents for Korea had discussed the desirability of
continuing to utilize Japanese technicians and functionaries in the postwar era
to fill positions where no qualified Koreans were available. (James A. Matray, "Hodge Podge: American Occupation Policy in
Korea, 1945-1948," Korean Studies 19 (1995), p. 23.)
On the advice of Undersecretary of State
Dean Acheson, President Truman released a public statement saluting Koreans as
"a freedom-loving and heroic people" and promising that all Japanese
officials would quickly be replaced. ("Draft Statement Prepared for
President Truman," 12 September 1945, 740.00119-PW/9-1845, National
Archives Record Group 59.)
Exactly why Hodge made his ill-fated
decision remains unclear. One possibility is that he was simply following
MacArthur's occupation policy for Japan, which was based on utilizing the
existing governmental structures to implement American policies. Whatever the
reasons, MacArthur, anticipating instructions from Washington, directed Hodge
to remove immediately the Government General and its officials. Hodge might
have attempted to work through the Korean People's Republic, which was already
exercising governmental responsibilities in many areas and was far and away the
strongest and best organized political group in southern Korea. Yet Hodge and
his political adviser, H. Merrill Benninghoff, had only a sketchy idea of who
was who in Korean politics during those first few weeks. When Hodge invited
Korean political parties to send two representatives to meet with him, more
than two hundred individuals appeared. By November there were 134 different
political parties registered with the American headquartersY
Unlike General Gracey in Indochina, Hodge maintained personal lines of
communication with all factions, including with the Communist leader Pak Hon-yong. (NIS Survey of Political Parties, tab C JCS 1483, ABC
014 Japan, 13 April, National Archives Record Group 165, entry 421, box 32.)
Southern Korea can best be described as
a powder keg ready to explode at the application of a spark," wrote H.
Merrill Benninghoff, General Hodge's political adviser, in his first report to
Washington one month after the Japanese surrender. Inflation continued.
Thousands of Koreans were unemployed, either because they refused to work any
longer in Japanese-owned businesses or because of the collapse of many
war-driven industries. Refugees from the north swelled the population of the
crowded cities. There was a critical shortage of rice and coal. Korean
agriculture was a mess and had been so for years. About 3 percent of the
population owned two-thirds of the arable land. Farms were small and farming
methods primitive. More than half of all farmers were tenants who worked their
rented land under conditions that made sharecroppers in the American South
appear almost affluent by comparison. (Richard E. Lauterbach, "Hodge's
Korea," Virginia Quarterly Review 23, June 1947, p. 359.)
All Korean political groups, Benninghoff
concluded, "seem to have the common ideas of seizing Japanese property,
ejecting the Japanese from Korea and achieving immediate independence. Beyond
this they have few ideas ... Korea is completely ripe for agitators."
(Benninghoff to the Secretary of State, 15 September 1945, FRUS, 1945, vol. 6,
pp. 1049-50.)
In addition some of the leaders of the
Korean former provisional government returned from their long exile in China
and the United States. This, they had been assured by their conservative
English-speaking informants, would be a great step toward stability in southern
Korean politics. The two best-known members of the Korean provisional
government were Kim Ku, who led the organization from China, and Syngman Rhee,
its representative in the United States. Kim Ku had gained fame for
masterminding a 1932
Hodge's difficulties were not just
confined to squabbling political factions in Seoul. The military government,
having proclaimed itself the sole authority, had somehow to extend its control
over the eight sprawling provinces of southern Korea. As had the Government
General in Seoul, Japanese officials in the provinces kept Hodge supplied with
continuing reports on the disorder and danger to lives and property in the
countryside. This disorder and lawlessness were generally attributed to
Communist inspiration.
By mid October,
Hodge had received his two additional divisions, the 40th Infantry Division and
the 6th Infantry Division, from the Philippines. A portion of the 6th Division,
having gained experience in the evacuation of the Japanese from the
Philippines, took on the task of completing the embarkation of thousands of
Japanese from the port of Pusan on the east coast of Korea. The rest of the
division, together with the 40th, made their way into the countryside. Military
government companies that were supposed to assume responsibility for
supervising or implementing all local government functions followed the
divisions a few months later.
As their trucks rolled down the dusty
roads and byways into towns and villages, the GIs received a warm welcome.
Koreans ran from their homes "pointing and waving in the direction of the
oncoming Americans. They lined the streets, sometimes three deep, shouting and
waving homemade American and Korean flags .... At the entrance to the larger
towns archways garnished with fresh flowers were constructed across the road.
Across the top were signs of all sizes and descriptions' ‘Welcome Americans,'
'Thank you Allied Force,' or 'America-Korea.' ("History of US. Armed
Forces in Korea," pt. 1, ch. 6, p. 15.)
This cordiality did not last. In many
areas, American troops and' military government detachments clashed with local
People's Commit- tees of the Korean People's Republic that had assumed
governmental functions in towns and districts. In some larger towns People's
Republic leaders occupied the city hall and other municipal buildings. Local
If many Koreans soon found the American
presence in Korea tiresome, many Americans found Korea to be the farthest shore
of nowhere. "I thought at the time that Korea was hopeless as a
society," recalled a former American engineer officer at Inchon. "It
was this curious mixture of more or less 20th century and 15th century. You
could smell it forty miles at sea .... The only fertilizer they had was human
excrement. Honey wagons were all over the place .... This was obviously a
society totally alien to us young Americans. We had no comprehension of
it." (Richard A. Ericson interview by Charles Stuart Kennedy, 27 March
1995, "Frontline Diplomacy" oral history collection, Center for the
Study of Diplomaey, Washington, D.C.)
The Koreans themselves "were not
overly friendly." They appeared to lack the obsequiousness and good
manners of the Japanese or the jovial and accommodating approach of those
Chinese long accustomed to dealing with foreigners. Instead the Koreans
appeared proud, stubborn, puritanical, and contentious, "the most
independent, cocky, sassiest people in the world." "The GIs in Japan
have got heaven and don't know it," declared one of Hodge's soldiers after
a short stay at a rest camp near Tokyo. "The Japanese are friendly.
The Koreans are hostile. You try to take a picture of a Korean child and he
runs away. You treat the Korean nice and he cheats you." Another soldier
declared he would "sign up for ten years" if he could spend them in
Japan rather than Korea (Walter Simmons, "GI's Haven't a Kind Word to Say
for Korea," Chicago Tribune, December 13, 1945.)
"Here we are not dealing with
wealthy U.S.-educated Koreans," observed General Hodge, "but with
poorly trained and poorly educated Orientals strongly affected by forty years
of Japanese control who stubbornly and fanatically hold to what they like and
dislike, who are definitely influenced by direct propaganda and with whom it is
almost impossible to reason." (MacArthur to JCS [enclosing letter
from Hodge], 2 February 1946, FRUS, 1946: The Far East, vol. 8, p. 629.)
Washington's solution for Korea's problems
was to pursue the goal of an international, or at least u.S.-Soviet,
trusteeship. The State Department argued that only Soviet agreement to an
international trusteeship could guarantee the elimination of the 38th parallel
barrier and the reunification of Korea. In December1945, Secretary of State
Byrnes journeyed to Moscow for talks with the Soviets on the situation in
Eastern Europe and the future of Korea. He carried with him an American
proposal for a five-year Great Power trusteeship over Korea.
Intrlude:
So at the start of WWII the British
had fought the war to protect themselves from the perceived threat of Hitler’s
Nazi regime by making a pact with Stalin. Yet, at Churchill's insistence, the
British war effort was also designed to preserve their imperial power.
For example, when the news of the
Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was received in London on the evening of 7
December 1941. Winston Churchill records in his memoirs his feelings of relief
and elation that Japan had, by this act, drawn the United States into the war:
'So we had won after all, Britain would live. The Commonwealth and Empire would
live. We should not be wiped out. Our history would not end.... Being saturated
and satisfied with emotion and sensation I went to bed and slept the sleep of
the saved and thankful. (Winston Churchill, Memories of the Second World War,
Vol. 6, War Comes to America, London, 1950, pp.209-10).
On waking up the next morning, his first
act was to plan to go to Washington to review with President Franklin Delano
Roosevelt 'the whole war plan in the light of reality and new facts as well as
the problems of production and distribution'. It was during this visit,
recounts Churchill, that Roosevelt 'first raised the Indian problem with me on
the usual American lines', meaning on anti-'Empire' lines. He continues: 'I
reacted so strongly at such length that he never raised it verbally again.'
(Ibid, p.188.).
For eighteen months after Japan's
surrender, the Labour government in London struggled
to find a political formula for India But in early 1947, as their economic
crisis grew deeper, and in fear of be in trapped in an Indian civil war, they
threw in the towel. A new vicero was sent to wind up
the Raj in just over a year. Lord Mountbatte after
persuading the Congress that partition was the best solution, he
staged a lightning retreat after six months office in August 1947. Within less
than a year, Ceylon, Sri Lank, and Burma had gained independence as well.
The surprising thing was that this
retreat from empire did nt become general. It was
true that the British also abandoned the mandate in Palestine. But that was
mainly because they thought the, further involvement in the Arab-Jewish
conflict would wreck the Middle East primacy they were so keen to maintain.
Britain, Franc the Netherlands and Belgium reached to rebuild their
war-shattered economies, also needed cheap raw materials and tropical
commodities that they could resell for the dollars to help pay for their
essential imports from the United States. Their colonies now seemed the perfect
source: they could be forced to accept payment at below the world price, and in
Europe's soft currencies not hard American dollars. Cocoa from West Africa,
copper from the Congo, tin and rubber from Malaya, sugar, coffee and oil from
the Dutch East Indies would keep the wolf from the door until the metropolitan
economies got back into balance. 'Indie verloren, ramspoed geboren' ('If the Indies
are lost, ruin will follow') ran the saying in Holland. 'We are on the edge of
the abyss,' said the Netherlands finance minister in April 1947, shortly before
the Dutch 'police action' to regain control of key economic assets in Java.
The argument for empire was not solely
economic. A crucial part of the British case for staying put in the Middle East
was geostrategic. Soviet aggression in Central Europe, the strategists argued,
could best be deterred by the use of air power - the huge bomber force the
British had deployed against Nazi Germany. Russia's industrial cities were
beyond the range of Britain's own airfields, but from its Middle East bases
they could be bombed at will. The British imperium in the Middle East would
make up for British weakness close to home in Europe. France's post-war leaders
were also convinced that they needed their empire - as much if not more so. After France's defeat in
June 1940, it had been the African colonies that had rallied to 'Free France'.
Any hope of recovering France's pre-war status as one of the world's great
powers seemed to depend on keeping the empire intact, not least as a source of
military manpower.
For updates
click homepage here